Thrombosis research最新文献

Introduction: Anticoagulation was once recommended for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). However, its survival benefit still remained controversial. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of anticoagulation on the long-term survival of PAH patients.

Methods: The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and WanFang electronic database were searched for eligible studies. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for effect estimate regarding anticoagulation on the survival of PAH patients.

Results: Fifteen cohort studies involving 4266 PAH patients were included. Approximately 45.8 % patients received anticoagulation. The mean follow-up period ranged from 2.1 to 14 years. Anticoagulation had a tendency to, however, did not significantly reduce mortality of PAH patients (HR: 0.86, 95 % CI: 0.73-1.02). In subgroup analysis, anticoagulation decreased the mortality risk as analyzed from retrospective studies (HR: 0.80, 95 % CI: 0.65-0.98), but not prospective studies (HR: 0.95, 95 % CI: 0.70-1.29). For both idiopathic PAH (IPAH) and connective tissue disease associated PAH (CTD-PAH), anticoagulation therapy did not significantly improve the long-term survival rate (HR: 0.83, 95 % CI: 0.65-1.07, and HR: 1.05, 95 % CI: 0.77-1.42, respectively), and this result remained unchanged when pooling data from either retrospective or prospective studies. Further analysis showed that anticoagulation had no advantage in reducing mortality in patients with systemic sclerosis associated PAH, systemic erythematosus lupus related PAH (free of antiphospholipid syndrome), or CTD-PAH of non-specified etiology.

Conclusion: Anticoagulation may not reduce the long-term mortality of PAH patients, including those with IPAH and CTD-PAH. In the management of PAH, anticoagulants should be prescribed with caution before comprehensive risk to benefit evaluation. Larger and more vigorously designed controlled trials are warranted.

Hemophilia A, a severe hereditary hemorrhagic disorder characterized by a deficiency in blood clotting factors, imposes a significant economic burden on individuals, healthcare systems, and society, with inhibitors exacerbating the socioeconomic impact. The detrimental impact on the quality of life for patients and caregivers, including functional limitations, is particularly pronounced during bleeding episodes and in the presence of inhibitors. The increasing prevalence of Hemophilia A across the MENA region is evident, marked by the approval of various therapies and intensified research and development efforts focusing on treatment innovations. Despite commendable progress in Hemophilia management, challenges persist in providing care for Hemophilia patients in the region. This review aims to shed light on the current landscape, challenges, and market forecasts for Hemophilia A in the MENA region. Additionally, it strives to provide valuable insights for the future, emphasizing the need for clear approaches to ensure comprehensive care for individuals with Hemophilia.

Introduction: Factor Xa inhibitor (FXaI)-associated bleeding events are common and associated with substantial morbidity. Systematic evaluation of widely available, effective, and affordable FXaI bleed management strategies is needed.

Materials and methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of FXaI-treated patients presenting to a tertiary academic medical center from January 2018 to May 2019 who received 25-50 IU/kg 4F-PCC for either FXaI-associated major bleeding or urgent surgery. The primary outcome was hemostatic efficacy, and the safety outcome was the 30-day risk of thromboembolism.

Results: PCC was used to treat FXaI-associated bleeding in 83 cases (79.1 %) and was given before urgent surgery in 22 cases (20.9 %). Sixty-six patients were on apixaban, 38 were on rivaroxaban and one patient was on edoxaban. Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and gastrointestinal bleeding accounted for most bleeds (74.7 %). Median interval between last DOAC intake and presentation to triage was 9 h [IQR 5.3-14.8] and median PCC dosing was 40.0 IU/kg [IQR 28.5-46.6]. Forty-two patients (40.0 %) had pre-PCC FXaI levels drawn with median FXaI levels of 114.5 ng/mL [IQR 70.0-175.0]. Effective hemostasis occurred in 66.7 % [95%CI 55.4-76.3] of patients receiving PCC for bleeding and surgical hemostasis was rated as normal in 95.5 % (95%CI 76.5-100.0) for patients having urgent surgery. The 30-day risk of thromboembolism was 7.6 % [95%CI 3.7-14.5] and 22.9 % [95%CI 15.8-31.8] of patients died.

Conclusions: PCC for FXaI-associated bleeding was associated with hemostatic efficacy in two-thirds of patients and thromboembolic events were uncommon. PCC represents a promising treatment strategy for FXaI-associated bleeding.

Introduction: SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection and multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) are risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Guidelines for VTE prophylaxis were established at our institution at the beginning of the pandemic. Patients who had any VTE risk factors in addition to COVID-19 met criteria for anticoagulation prophylaxis. Patients who were diagnosed with MIS-C met criteria regardless of additional risk factors.

Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients admitted with COVID-19 or MIS-C to determine compliance with VTE prophylaxis guidelines and to evaluate the incidence of VTE and bleeding events in our population.

Results and conclusions: Among a total of 678 patients admitted with COVID-19 or MIS-C, 519 (76 %) patients met criteria for VTE prophylaxis and 348 (65.6 %) started prophylaxis. Logistic regression analysis identified a personal or family history of thrombosis or thrombophilia, diagnosis of MIS-C, admission to the intensive care unit, and presence of a central venous catheter as significantly associated with starting VTE prophylaxis. There were 18 patients who developed VTE. Minor bleeding events occurred in 19 patients (5 %), patient important bleeding, no intervention occurred in 8 patients (2 %), clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding in 8 patients (2 %), and major bleeding in 10 patients (3 %). The incidence of VTE in our patients with COVID-19 and MIS-C is similar to VTE rates at other institutions. We found that universally recognized VTE risk factors were appropriate to include as risk factors for thrombosis in hospitalized children with COVID-19 and MIS-C.