The impact of strategies on young children’s saving for the future

IF 1.8 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Journal of Experimental Child Psychology Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105995
Ege Kamber, Madi K. Maguire, Edyta K. Tehrani, Tessa R. Mazachowsky, Caitlin E.V. Mahy
{"title":"The impact of strategies on young children’s saving for the future","authors":"Ege Kamber,&nbsp;Madi K. Maguire,&nbsp;Edyta K. Tehrani,&nbsp;Tessa R. Mazachowsky,&nbsp;Caitlin E.V. Mahy","doi":"10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The ability to save resources for future use, or <em>saving,</em> begins to emerge around 3 years of age, but children show low rates of saving during the preschool years. Thus, several strategies have been used to improve preschoolers’ saving, such as providing a prompt, budgeting, increasing psychological distance, and simulating the future. The current study investigated (a) the development of saving in early childhood, (b) the impact of several saving strategies on children’s saving (i.e., budgeting, tracking expenses, and psychological distance), and (c) whether the effectiveness of the strategies changed with age. Here, 3- to 5-year-old Canadian children (N = 254) completed the Saving Board Game, and their parents completed the saving subscale of the Children’s Future Thinking Questionnaire. In the Saving Board Game, children were randomly assigned to one of the five strategies: (a) control, (b) budgeting, (c) tracking, (d) adult perspective, or (e) child perspective. An analysis of covariance with age, strategy, and response option order (as a covariate) showed a main effect of age, with 5-year-olds saving more than 3-year-olds. There was no effect of strategy or an interaction between strategy and age on children’s token saving. Parent-reported child saving was positively correlated with children’s Saving Board Game performance only in the control condition. We consider why these strategies failed to increase children’s saving.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","volume":"246 ","pages":"Article 105995"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022096524001358","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ability to save resources for future use, or saving, begins to emerge around 3 years of age, but children show low rates of saving during the preschool years. Thus, several strategies have been used to improve preschoolers’ saving, such as providing a prompt, budgeting, increasing psychological distance, and simulating the future. The current study investigated (a) the development of saving in early childhood, (b) the impact of several saving strategies on children’s saving (i.e., budgeting, tracking expenses, and psychological distance), and (c) whether the effectiveness of the strategies changed with age. Here, 3- to 5-year-old Canadian children (N = 254) completed the Saving Board Game, and their parents completed the saving subscale of the Children’s Future Thinking Questionnaire. In the Saving Board Game, children were randomly assigned to one of the five strategies: (a) control, (b) budgeting, (c) tracking, (d) adult perspective, or (e) child perspective. An analysis of covariance with age, strategy, and response option order (as a covariate) showed a main effect of age, with 5-year-olds saving more than 3-year-olds. There was no effect of strategy or an interaction between strategy and age on children’s token saving. Parent-reported child saving was positively correlated with children’s Saving Board Game performance only in the control condition. We consider why these strategies failed to increase children’s saving.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
策略对幼儿为未来储蓄的影响。
为将来使用而储蓄资源的能力,即储蓄,在儿童 3 岁左右开始出现,但学龄前儿童的储蓄率很低。因此,人们采用了多种策略来提高学龄前儿童的储蓄能力,如提供提示、预算、增加心理距离和模拟未来等。本研究调查了(a)幼儿期储蓄的发展,(b)几种储蓄策略(即预算、跟踪支出和心理距离)对儿童储蓄的影响,以及(c)这些策略的有效性是否会随着年龄的增长而改变。在这里,3 到 5 岁的加拿大儿童(254 人)完成了储蓄棋盘游戏,他们的父母完成了儿童未来思考问卷的储蓄分量表。在储蓄棋盘游戏中,儿童被随机分配到五种策略中的一种:(a) 控制、(b) 预算、(c) 追踪、(d) 成人视角或 (e) 儿童视角。对年龄、策略和反应选项顺序(作为协变量)进行的协方差分析表明,年龄具有主效应,5 岁儿童比 3 岁儿童储蓄更多。策略或策略与年龄之间的交互作用对儿童的代币储蓄没有影响。只有在对照组条件下,家长报告的儿童储蓄与儿童的储蓄棋盘游戏成绩呈正相关。我们考虑了这些策略未能增加儿童储蓄的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
190
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Child Psychology is an excellent source of information concerning all aspects of the development of children. It includes empirical psychological research on cognitive, social/emotional, and physical development. In addition, the journal periodically publishes Special Topic issues.
期刊最新文献
Children plan manual actions similarly in structured tasks and in free play Editorial Board Concurrent and predictive associations between executive function and numerical skills in early childhood Examining methodological influences on the rhythmic priming effect: A commentary on Kim, McLaren, and Lee (2024) Parenting relationships as a moderator of how socioeconomic status and household chaos relate to children’s cognitive and socioemotional skills
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1