TPACK based blended learning model to improve engineering graduate attributes – a case study with Kirkpatrick evaluation

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education Pub Date : 2024-06-28 DOI:10.1108/jarhe-08-2023-0340
D. Kavitha, D. Anitha
{"title":"TPACK based blended learning model to improve engineering graduate attributes – a case study with Kirkpatrick evaluation","authors":"D. Kavitha, D. Anitha","doi":"10.1108/jarhe-08-2023-0340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Engineering graduates are expected to have certain attributes in addition to technical expertise that includes development in personal and interpersonal skills with societal concern. Pedagogical strategies have been continuously evolving to improve the graduate attributes. An efficient framework for blended learning that improves the graduate attributes is the need of the hour now.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>A blended course model based on TPACK is proposed and the same is evaluated with Kirkpatrick evaluation method to assess the attainment of the attributes. A mapping strategy is developed for the relation between course outcomes and graduate attributes. The proposed model is tested with “Microcontroller” course in undergraduate program with students of three consecutive years in three different learning environments: offline, online and blended. The performance of the students in assessments, students’ feedback and their interest towards additional learning, project skills and job recruitment are the different elements taken for analysis.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The results obtained show that the impact of the proposed blended learning framework in improving the graduate attributes is greater than the offline environments. The analysis is done based on Kirkpatrick evaluation, which demonstrates the improvement in graduate attributes in blended learning by 18% compared to offline mode.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>It is seen that blended learning shall be implemented using TPACK model effectively and the proposed model results in improvement of graduate attributes. Though the findings are good enough, the case study is limited to a particular organization and so, the various underlying parameters may vary for different institutions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The methodology proposed is viable in any institution and may be tested for any program. The effectiveness of the blended learning is known and in this case study, the analysis from the course to the level of program is done.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Social implications</h3>\n<p>The research work highlights the integration of technology, pedagogy and content knowledge to enhance engineering students' skills. Hence, it explores a new required norms of education, potentially shaping future teaching learning methodologies. By employing the Kirkpatrick evaluation, it offers insights into the model's effectiveness and influences educational practices in the need of the hour.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The proposed method and results signifies an innovative endeavor that combines technological expertise, pedagogical methods and subject matter knowledge to enhance the attributes of engineering graduates. Kirkpatrick evaluation adds a distinct dimension by objectively assessing the model's impact. The results are analyzed from the original data obtained from a particular institution.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":45508,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jarhe-08-2023-0340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Engineering graduates are expected to have certain attributes in addition to technical expertise that includes development in personal and interpersonal skills with societal concern. Pedagogical strategies have been continuously evolving to improve the graduate attributes. An efficient framework for blended learning that improves the graduate attributes is the need of the hour now.

Design/methodology/approach

A blended course model based on TPACK is proposed and the same is evaluated with Kirkpatrick evaluation method to assess the attainment of the attributes. A mapping strategy is developed for the relation between course outcomes and graduate attributes. The proposed model is tested with “Microcontroller” course in undergraduate program with students of three consecutive years in three different learning environments: offline, online and blended. The performance of the students in assessments, students’ feedback and their interest towards additional learning, project skills and job recruitment are the different elements taken for analysis.

Findings

The results obtained show that the impact of the proposed blended learning framework in improving the graduate attributes is greater than the offline environments. The analysis is done based on Kirkpatrick evaluation, which demonstrates the improvement in graduate attributes in blended learning by 18% compared to offline mode.

Research limitations/implications

It is seen that blended learning shall be implemented using TPACK model effectively and the proposed model results in improvement of graduate attributes. Though the findings are good enough, the case study is limited to a particular organization and so, the various underlying parameters may vary for different institutions.

Practical implications

The methodology proposed is viable in any institution and may be tested for any program. The effectiveness of the blended learning is known and in this case study, the analysis from the course to the level of program is done.

Social implications

The research work highlights the integration of technology, pedagogy and content knowledge to enhance engineering students' skills. Hence, it explores a new required norms of education, potentially shaping future teaching learning methodologies. By employing the Kirkpatrick evaluation, it offers insights into the model's effectiveness and influences educational practices in the need of the hour.

Originality/value

The proposed method and results signifies an innovative endeavor that combines technological expertise, pedagogical methods and subject matter knowledge to enhance the attributes of engineering graduates. Kirkpatrick evaluation adds a distinct dimension by objectively assessing the model's impact. The results are analyzed from the original data obtained from a particular institution.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于 TPACK 的混合式学习模式,提高工程专业毕业生的素质--柯克帕特里克评估案例研究
目的人们期望工程学毕业生除了具备专业技术知识外,还应在个人和人际交往技能方面有所发展,并关注社会问题。教学策略一直在不断发展,以提高毕业生的素质。基于 TPACK 的混合式课程模型被提出,并用 Kirkpatrick 评估方法对其进行评估,以评价毕业生的特质。针对课程成果和毕业生属性之间的关系制定了一种映射策略。提议的模型在本科 "微控制器 "课程中进行了测试,连续三年的学生在三种不同的学习环境中学习:离线、在线和混合。学生在评估中的表现、学生的反馈以及他们对额外学习、项目技能和工作招聘的兴趣是分析的不同要素。研究的局限性/意义可以看出,混合式学习应有效地使用 TPACK 模式来实施,所提出的模式能提高毕业生的素质。尽管研究结果很好,但案例研究仅限于特定机构,因此,不同机构的各种基本参数可能会有所不同。社会影响这项研究工作强调了技术、教学法和内容知识的整合,以提高工科学生的技能。因此,它探索了一种新的教育规范,有可能塑造未来的教学方法。通过采用柯克帕特里克评价法,该研究深入了解了该模式的有效性,并影响了教育实践,以满足时代的需要。 原创性/价值所提出的方法和结果标志着一种创新尝试,它将技术专长、教学方法和学科知识相结合,以提高工程专业毕业生的素质。柯克帕特里克评估通过客观评估模型的影响,增加了一个独特的维度。结果是根据从特定机构获得的原始数据进行分析的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education
Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Higher education around the world has become a major topic of discussion, debate, and controversy, as a range of political, economic, social, and technological pressures result in a myriad of changes at all levels. But the quality and quantity of critical dialogue and research and their relationship with practice remains limited. This internationally peer-reviewed journal addresses this shortfall by focusing on the scholarship and practice of teaching and learning and higher education and covers: - Higher education teaching, learning, curriculum, assessment, policy, management, leadership, and related areas - Digitization, internationalization, and democratization of higher education, and related areas such as lifelong and lifewide learning - Innovation, change, and reflections on current practices
期刊最新文献
Improving students’ academic integrity through academic integrity training (AIT) program in higher education Adapting accounting education to evolving business paradigm-an Indian perspective Second language writing anxiety and ChatGPT adoption as an automated writing evaluation tool Remote learning and exploring the factors affecting students' adoption of behavioral intentions toward conference applications Locus of control, academic procrastination and academic performance amongst university students: moderating role of parental involvement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1