Dual verifications in mHealth apps: Supporting self-regulation or increasing friction?

IF 7.1 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Electronic Markets Pub Date : 2024-06-22 DOI:10.1007/s12525-024-00716-0
KyungPyo Kang, JaeHong Park
{"title":"Dual verifications in mHealth apps: Supporting self-regulation or increasing friction?","authors":"KyungPyo Kang, JaeHong Park","doi":"10.1007/s12525-024-00716-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mobile health applications (mHealth apps) are widely used for supporting individuals in achieving health-related goals. While various strategies such as reminders and financial incentives have been explored, the impact of verification systems on goal achievement remains understudied, particularly in the context of mHealth apps. This study investigates the effects of a dual verification system on goal outcomes, which require users to submit proof photos before and after activities. Using a difference-in-differences (DID) with matching technique, we examine whether increased verification steps hinder users’ commitment to self-development goals. Drawing upon friction theory, our findings suggest that implementing a dual verification system negatively influences goal achievement rates due to increased friction. Moreover, we find that the effect varies based on users’ engagement patterns and deposit amounts. Our study contributes to understand the effects of verification systems on users’ goal achievement and provides practical insights for designing personalized verification strategies in mHealth apps.</p>","PeriodicalId":47719,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Markets","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Markets","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-024-00716-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mobile health applications (mHealth apps) are widely used for supporting individuals in achieving health-related goals. While various strategies such as reminders and financial incentives have been explored, the impact of verification systems on goal achievement remains understudied, particularly in the context of mHealth apps. This study investigates the effects of a dual verification system on goal outcomes, which require users to submit proof photos before and after activities. Using a difference-in-differences (DID) with matching technique, we examine whether increased verification steps hinder users’ commitment to self-development goals. Drawing upon friction theory, our findings suggest that implementing a dual verification system negatively influences goal achievement rates due to increased friction. Moreover, we find that the effect varies based on users’ engagement patterns and deposit amounts. Our study contributes to understand the effects of verification systems on users’ goal achievement and provides practical insights for designing personalized verification strategies in mHealth apps.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
移动医疗应用程序中的双重验证:支持自律还是增加摩擦?
移动医疗应用程序(mHealth apps)被广泛用于支持个人实现与健康相关的目标。虽然人们探索了各种策略,如提醒和经济激励,但验证系统对目标实现的影响仍未得到充分研究,尤其是在移动医疗应用程序中。本研究调查了双重验证系统对目标结果的影响,该系统要求用户在活动前后提交证明照片。我们使用差异与匹配技术(DID),研究了验证步骤的增加是否会阻碍用户对自我发展目标的承诺。根据摩擦理论,我们的研究结果表明,由于摩擦的增加,实施双重验证系统会对目标实现率产生负面影响。此外,我们还发现这种影响因用户的参与模式和存款金额而异。我们的研究有助于理解验证系统对用户目标实现的影响,并为移动医疗应用程序中个性化验证策略的设计提供了实用的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Electronic Markets
Electronic Markets Multiple-
CiteScore
14.80
自引率
15.30%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: Electronic Markets (EM) stands as a premier academic journal providing a dynamic platform for research into various forms of networked business. Recognizing the pivotal role of information and communication technology (ICT), EM delves into how ICT transforms the interactions between organizations and customers across diverse domains such as social networks, electronic commerce, supply chain management, and customer relationship management. Electronic markets, in essence, encompass the realms of networked business where multiple suppliers and customers engage in economic transactions within single or multiple tiers of economic value chains. This broad concept encompasses various forms, including allocation platforms with dynamic price discovery mechanisms, fostering atomistic relationships. Notable examples originate from financial markets (e.g., CBOT, XETRA) and energy markets (e.g., EEX, ICE). Join us in exploring the multifaceted landscape of electronic markets and their transformative impact on business interactions and dynamics.
期刊最新文献
Certified data chats for future used car markets How online exposure to nature affects customer engagement: Evidence from Sina Weibo Critical success factors of users’ continuous intention of adopting cryptocurrency exchanges: LAS-VICT principle On the influence of conventional and automated market makers on market quality in cryptoeconomic systems Industrial data ecosystems and data spaces
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1