Improved Runge Kutta Optimization Using Compound Mutation Strategy in Reinforcement Learning Decision Making for Feature Selection

IF 4.9 3区 计算机科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Bionic Engineering Pub Date : 2024-06-25 DOI:10.1007/s42235-024-00555-x
Jinpeng Huang, Yi Chen, Ali Asghar Heidari, Lei Liu, Huiling Chen, Guoxi Liang
{"title":"Improved Runge Kutta Optimization Using Compound Mutation Strategy in Reinforcement Learning Decision Making for Feature Selection","authors":"Jinpeng Huang,&nbsp;Yi Chen,&nbsp;Ali Asghar Heidari,&nbsp;Lei Liu,&nbsp;Huiling Chen,&nbsp;Guoxi Liang","doi":"10.1007/s42235-024-00555-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Runge Kutta Optimization (RUN) is a widely utilized metaheuristic algorithm. However, it suffers from these issues: the imbalance between exploration and exploitation and the tendency to fall into local optima when it solves real-world optimization problems. To address these challenges, this study aims to endow each individual in the population with a certain level of intelligence, allowing them to make autonomous decisions about their next optimization behavior. By incorporating Reinforcement Learning (RL) and the Composite Mutation Strategy (CMS), each individual in the population goes through additional self-improvement steps after completing the original algorithmic phases, referred to as RLRUN. That is, each individual in the RUN population is trained intelligently using RL to independently choose three different differentiation strategies in CMS when solving different problems. To validate the competitiveness of RLRUN, comprehensive empirical tests were conducted using the IEEE CEC 2017 benchmark suite. Extensive comparative experiments with 13 conventional algorithms and 10 advanced algorithms were conducted. The experimental results demonstrated that RLRUN excels in convergence accuracy and speed, surpassing even some champion algorithms. Additionally, this study introduced a binary version of RLRUN, named bRLRUN, which was employed for the feature selection problem. Across 24 high-dimensional datasets encompassing UCI datasets and SBCB machine learning library microarray datasets, bRLRUN occupies the top position in classification accuracy and the number of selected feature subsets compared to some algorithms. In conclusion, the proposed algorithm demonstrated that it exhibits a strong competitive advantage in high-dimensional feature selection for complex datasets.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":614,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bionic Engineering","volume":"21 5","pages":"2460 - 2496"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s42235-024-00555-x.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bionic Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42235-024-00555-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Runge Kutta Optimization (RUN) is a widely utilized metaheuristic algorithm. However, it suffers from these issues: the imbalance between exploration and exploitation and the tendency to fall into local optima when it solves real-world optimization problems. To address these challenges, this study aims to endow each individual in the population with a certain level of intelligence, allowing them to make autonomous decisions about their next optimization behavior. By incorporating Reinforcement Learning (RL) and the Composite Mutation Strategy (CMS), each individual in the population goes through additional self-improvement steps after completing the original algorithmic phases, referred to as RLRUN. That is, each individual in the RUN population is trained intelligently using RL to independently choose three different differentiation strategies in CMS when solving different problems. To validate the competitiveness of RLRUN, comprehensive empirical tests were conducted using the IEEE CEC 2017 benchmark suite. Extensive comparative experiments with 13 conventional algorithms and 10 advanced algorithms were conducted. The experimental results demonstrated that RLRUN excels in convergence accuracy and speed, surpassing even some champion algorithms. Additionally, this study introduced a binary version of RLRUN, named bRLRUN, which was employed for the feature selection problem. Across 24 high-dimensional datasets encompassing UCI datasets and SBCB machine learning library microarray datasets, bRLRUN occupies the top position in classification accuracy and the number of selected feature subsets compared to some algorithms. In conclusion, the proposed algorithm demonstrated that it exhibits a strong competitive advantage in high-dimensional feature selection for complex datasets.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在特征选择的强化学习决策中使用复合突变策略改进 Runge Kutta 优化方法
Runge Kutta 优化(RUN)是一种广泛使用的元启发式算法。然而,它也存在这些问题:探索和利用之间的不平衡,以及在解决实际优化问题时容易陷入局部最优状态。为了应对这些挑战,本研究旨在赋予群体中的每个个体一定程度的智能,使其能够自主决定下一步的优化行为。通过结合强化学习(RL)和复合突变策略(CMS),种群中的每个个体在完成原始算法阶段后,都会经历额外的自我完善步骤,称为 RLRUN。也就是说,RUN 群体中的每个个体都要经过智能训练,在解决不同问题时,利用 RL 在 CMS 中独立选择三种不同的差异化策略。为了验证 RLRUN 的竞争力,我们使用 IEEE CEC 2017 基准套件进行了全面的实证测试。与 13 种传统算法和 10 种先进算法进行了广泛的对比实验。实验结果表明,RLRUN 在收敛精度和速度方面表现出色,甚至超过了一些冠军算法。此外,本研究还引入了 RLRUN 的二进制版本,命名为 bRLRUN,用于特征选择问题。在包括 UCI 数据集和 SBCB 机器学习库微阵列数据集在内的 24 个高维数据集中,与一些算法相比,bRLRUN 在分类准确率和所选特征子集数量上都名列前茅。总之,所提出的算法证明了它在复杂数据集的高维特征选择方面具有很强的竞争优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Bionic Engineering
Journal of Bionic Engineering 工程技术-材料科学:生物材料
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
162
审稿时长
10.0 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bionic Engineering (JBE) is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original research papers and reviews that apply the knowledge learned from nature and biological systems to solve concrete engineering problems. The topics that JBE covers include but are not limited to: Mechanisms, kinematical mechanics and control of animal locomotion, development of mobile robots with walking (running and crawling), swimming or flying abilities inspired by animal locomotion. Structures, morphologies, composition and physical properties of natural and biomaterials; fabrication of new materials mimicking the properties and functions of natural and biomaterials. Biomedical materials, artificial organs and tissue engineering for medical applications; rehabilitation equipment and devices. Development of bioinspired computation methods and artificial intelligence for engineering applications.
期刊最新文献
Sandwich-Structured Solar Cells with Accelerated Conversion Efficiency by Self-Cooling and Self-Cleaning Design From Perception to Action: Brain-to-Brain Information Transmission of Pigeons Design and Motion Characteristics of a Ray-Inspired Micro-Robot Made of Magnetic Film Bionic Jumping of Humanoid Robot via Online Centroid Trajectory Optimization and High Dynamic Motion Controller Multi-Sensor Fusion for State Estimation and Control of Cable-Driven Soft Robots
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1