Reimagining Business and Management as a Force for Good

IF 4.5 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS British Journal of Management Pub Date : 2024-06-23 DOI:10.1111/1467-8551.12846
Ken McPhail, Mario Kafouros, Peter McKiernan, Nelarine Cornelius
{"title":"Reimagining Business and Management as a Force for Good","authors":"Ken McPhail,&nbsp;Mario Kafouros,&nbsp;Peter McKiernan,&nbsp;Nelarine Cornelius","doi":"10.1111/1467-8551.12846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The literature has called on business and management scholars to help understand the global challenges we face and to find solutions. The prevailing narratives that have implicitly informed our understanding of business and management knowledge and practice as good need to be reimagined. We question whether our existing theoretical lenses, along with fundamental underlying assumptions about what constitutes labour, value and its creation, and the nature of assets, liabilities and materiality, act as a barrier to advancing business and management practice as a force for good and explore whether we need to go beyond applying existing theory to new research questions. Both Agency Theory and Stakeholder Theory have proven ineffective in aligning social and economic interests, while our disciplinary and publishing customs constrain our imagination and impede conceptions of fundamentally new ways of practising business.  We explore <i>why we need to reimagine business and management</i>; <i>what we mean by reimagining business and management</i> and <i>what it means to be a force for good</i>. We conclude that if the purpose of business needs to be reimagined, business schools will also need to change to be major catalysts in this process.</p>","PeriodicalId":48342,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Management","volume":"35 3","pages":"1099-1112"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8551.12846","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8551.12846","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The literature has called on business and management scholars to help understand the global challenges we face and to find solutions. The prevailing narratives that have implicitly informed our understanding of business and management knowledge and practice as good need to be reimagined. We question whether our existing theoretical lenses, along with fundamental underlying assumptions about what constitutes labour, value and its creation, and the nature of assets, liabilities and materiality, act as a barrier to advancing business and management practice as a force for good and explore whether we need to go beyond applying existing theory to new research questions. Both Agency Theory and Stakeholder Theory have proven ineffective in aligning social and economic interests, while our disciplinary and publishing customs constrain our imagination and impede conceptions of fundamentally new ways of practising business.  We explore why we need to reimagine business and management; what we mean by reimagining business and management and what it means to be a force for good. We conclude that if the purpose of business needs to be reimagined, business schools will also need to change to be major catalysts in this process.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将企业与管理重新塑造为一股善的力量
文献呼吁商业和管理学者帮助理解我们面临的全球挑战并找到解决方案。我们需要重新认识那些隐含着我们对商业和管理知识与实践的理解的普遍说法。我们要质疑的是,我们现有的理论视角,以及关于什么是劳动、价值及其创造,以及资产、负债和物质性的性质的基本假设,是否阻碍了将商业和管理实践提升为一种善的力量,并探讨我们是否需要超越将现有理论应用于新的研究问题。事实证明,代理理论和利益相关者理论在协调社会和经济利益方面效果不佳,而我们的学科和出版习惯限制了我们的想象力,阻碍了我们构想全新的商业实践方式。我们探讨了为什么需要重新构想商业和管理;重新构想商业和管理的含义以及成为一股善的力量的含义。我们的结论是,如果需要重新构想商业的目的,那么商学院也需要做出改变,成为这一过程中的主要催化剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Management provides a valuable outlet for research and scholarship on management-orientated themes and topics. It publishes articles of a multi-disciplinary and interdisciplinary nature as well as empirical research from within traditional disciplines and managerial functions. With contributions from around the globe, the journal includes articles across the full range of business and management disciplines. A subscription to British Journal of Management includes International Journal of Management Reviews, also published on behalf of the British Academy of Management.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Discretion in the Governance Work of Internal Auditors: Interplay Between Institutional Complexity and Organizational Embeddedness Social Impact Business Angels as New Impact Investors Are Prestigious Directors Mere Attractive Ornaments on the Corporate Christmas Tree? Determinants of IPO Overpricing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1