Exploring expert instructors’ conceptualization and teaching practices in asynchronous online discussions during case-based learning: a multiple case study

IF 4.5 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Computing in Higher Education Pub Date : 2024-06-18 DOI:10.1007/s12528-024-09405-5
Yishi Long, Adrie A. Koehler
{"title":"Exploring expert instructors’ conceptualization and teaching practices in asynchronous online discussions during case-based learning: a multiple case study","authors":"Yishi Long, Adrie A. Koehler","doi":"10.1007/s12528-024-09405-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The purpose of this multiple-case study was to investigate how expert instructors in case-based learning (CBL) conceptualize, structure, facilitate, and assess asynchronous online discussions while addressing challenges. Accordingly, we first interviewed three expert instructors with extensive teaching experience using CBL in higher education in online learning environments and then observed their online courses. Results indicated that (a) how instructors conceptualize case discussions may relate to different conceptualizations of their instructor role, (b) instructors typically clustered facilitation strategies creating posts that included content expertise, social congruence, and cognitive congruence, but <i>how</i> these strategies were implemented differed across instructors, and (c) instructors differentiated solutions to challenges associated with observed difficulties on the instructor and student side. Implications for practice and research are provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":15404,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-024-09405-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this multiple-case study was to investigate how expert instructors in case-based learning (CBL) conceptualize, structure, facilitate, and assess asynchronous online discussions while addressing challenges. Accordingly, we first interviewed three expert instructors with extensive teaching experience using CBL in higher education in online learning environments and then observed their online courses. Results indicated that (a) how instructors conceptualize case discussions may relate to different conceptualizations of their instructor role, (b) instructors typically clustered facilitation strategies creating posts that included content expertise, social congruence, and cognitive congruence, but how these strategies were implemented differed across instructors, and (c) instructors differentiated solutions to challenges associated with observed difficulties on the instructor and student side. Implications for practice and research are provided.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索专家讲师在基于案例学习的异步在线讨论中的教学理念和教学实践:一项多重案例研究
这项多案例研究的目的是调查基于案例的学习(CBL)的专家讲师是如何在应对挑战的同时,对异步在线讨论进行概念化、结构化、促进和评估的。因此,我们首先采访了三位在高等教育中使用 CBL 的在线学习环境中具有丰富教学经验的专家讲师,然后观察了他们的在线课程。结果表明:(a) 讲师如何将案例讨论概念化可能与其对讲师角色的不同概念化有关;(b) 讲师通常将促进策略集中起来,创建包括内容专业知识、社会一致性和认知一致性在内的职位,但不同讲师实施这些策略的方式各不相同;(c) 讲师对与讲师和学生方面观察到的困难相关的挑战采取不同的解决方案。本文提供了对实践和研究的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Computing in Higher Education
Journal of Computing in Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Journal of Computing in Higher Education (JCHE) contributes to our understanding of the design, development, and implementation of instructional processes and technologies in higher education. JCHE publishes original research, literature reviews, implementation and evaluation studies, and theoretical, conceptual, and policy papers that provide perspectives on instructional technology’s role in improving access, affordability, and outcomes of postsecondary education.  Priority is given to well-documented original papers that demonstrate a strong grounding in learning theory and/or rigorous educational research design.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the role of a microlearning instructional approach in an introductory database programming course: an exploratory case study The effects of pre-training types on cognitive load, self-efficacy, and problem-solving in computer programming Exploring expert instructors’ conceptualization and teaching practices in asynchronous online discussions during case-based learning: a multiple case study Connecting affordances of physical and virtual laboratory modes to engineering epistemic practices Using text mining and machine learning to predict reasoning activities from think-aloud transcripts in computer assisted learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1