Exploring the relationships between criminal self-efficacy factors and recidivism

IF 2.2 2区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Legal and Criminological Psychology Pub Date : 2024-06-24 DOI:10.1111/lcrp.12265
Jamie Ung, Caleb D. Lloyd
{"title":"Exploring the relationships between criminal self-efficacy factors and recidivism","authors":"Jamie Ung,&nbsp;Caleb D. Lloyd","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p><i>Criminal self-efficacy</i>, an antisocial belief representing positive appraisal of one's capabilities to enact crime, is theorized to drive criminal behaviour, but few measures exist. Our aim was to re-validate one measure of criminal self-efficacy by re-testing its ability to predict recidivism.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We used <i>Criminal Self-efficacy Scale-15</i> scores from 353 people on community corrections orders measured up to three times.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Confirmatory factor analysis revealed three latent factors we called <i>criminal connections</i>, <i>physical violence</i>, and <i>criminal expertise</i>. Cox regression survival analysis demonstrated that only <i>physical violence</i> scores predicted recidivism.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The three factors provide a meaningful conceptual basis for future attempts to develop measures of criminal self-efficacy that improve on the limitations of current measures. More broadly, there is a need to understand how specific antisocial beliefs such as criminal self-efficacy are related to criminal behaviour.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18022,"journal":{"name":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/lcrp.12265","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lcrp.12265","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Criminal self-efficacy, an antisocial belief representing positive appraisal of one's capabilities to enact crime, is theorized to drive criminal behaviour, but few measures exist. Our aim was to re-validate one measure of criminal self-efficacy by re-testing its ability to predict recidivism.

Methods

We used Criminal Self-efficacy Scale-15 scores from 353 people on community corrections orders measured up to three times.

Results

Confirmatory factor analysis revealed three latent factors we called criminal connections, physical violence, and criminal expertise. Cox regression survival analysis demonstrated that only physical violence scores predicted recidivism.

Conclusions

The three factors provide a meaningful conceptual basis for future attempts to develop measures of criminal self-efficacy that improve on the limitations of current measures. More broadly, there is a need to understand how specific antisocial beliefs such as criminal self-efficacy are related to criminal behaviour.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探讨犯罪自我效能因素与累犯之间的关系
目的 犯罪自我效能感是一种反社会信念,代表着对自身犯罪能力的积极评价,被认为是犯罪行为的驱动因素,但很少有衡量标准。我们的目的是通过重新测试犯罪自我效能感预测累犯的能力来重新验证犯罪自我效能感的一种测量方法。方法我们使用了 353 名社区矫正对象的犯罪自我效能感量表-15 分数,对其进行了最多三次测量。结论这三个因素为今后尝试开发犯罪自我效能感测量方法提供了一个有意义的概念基础,可以改善现有测量方法的局限性。更广泛地说,有必要了解犯罪自我效能感等特定反社会信念与犯罪行为之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Legal and Criminological Psychology publishes original papers in all areas of psychology and law: - victimology - policing and crime detection - crime prevention - management of offenders - mental health and the law - public attitudes to law - role of the expert witness - impact of law on behaviour - interviewing and eyewitness testimony - jury decision making - deception The journal publishes papers which advance professional and scientific knowledge defined broadly as the application of psychology to law and interdisciplinary enquiry in legal and psychological fields.
期刊最新文献
Urgent issues and prospects on investigative interviews with children and adolescents Effect of growth trajectories in communication skills on juvenile recidivism Issue Information Attitudes towards the penal system, ideology and dark traits Editorial to special issue on direct replications in legal and criminological psychology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1