Low net carbohydrate bakery products using cross‐linked phosphorylated wheat resistant starch type 4

IF 2.2 4区 农林科学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED Cereal Chemistry Pub Date : 2024-06-27 DOI:10.1002/cche.10811
Tanya Jeradechachai, Clodualdo C. Maningat
{"title":"Low net carbohydrate bakery products using cross‐linked phosphorylated wheat resistant starch type 4","authors":"Tanya Jeradechachai, Clodualdo C. Maningat","doi":"10.1002/cche.10811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and ObjectivesLimited information exists regarding the impact of high levels of cross‐linked phosphorylated resistant wheat starch type 4 (RS4) in bakery products. This study aimed to explore the impact of incorporating RS4 (at 64%–83% flour weight) and wheat protein isolate (WPI) in low net carb breads (RS4‐Bread), enzyme crackers (RS4‐Enzyme), and saltine crackers (RS4‐Saltine).FindingsRS4‐Bread had comparable bread quality, loaf volumes, and crumb firmness (Days 0, 1, and 7) as the wheat flour control. The in vitro total dietary fiber analysis of RS4‐Bread yielded a fiber recovery of 90.0%–98.1%, db. RS4‐Enzyme had higher water absorption, longer mixing time, and less elastic dough, but comparable cracker hardness to the control. RS4‐Saltine had a higher water absorption, but lower cracker hardness compared to the control. Fiber recovery of RS4‐Enzyme and RS4‐Saltine crackers were 85.6% and 88.8%, respectively.ConclusionsAnalytical measurements indicated a significant discrepancy in predicting bake mix time and absorption for RS4‐Bread. This research fills gaps in the understanding of low net carb bread, saltine crackers, and enzyme crackers, providing valuable insights into future product development.Significance and NoveltyCombining RS4 and WPI offers potential for health‐promoting, high‐fiber, low net carb products, applicable in various flour‐based foods.","PeriodicalId":9807,"journal":{"name":"Cereal Chemistry","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cereal Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cche.10811","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and ObjectivesLimited information exists regarding the impact of high levels of cross‐linked phosphorylated resistant wheat starch type 4 (RS4) in bakery products. This study aimed to explore the impact of incorporating RS4 (at 64%–83% flour weight) and wheat protein isolate (WPI) in low net carb breads (RS4‐Bread), enzyme crackers (RS4‐Enzyme), and saltine crackers (RS4‐Saltine).FindingsRS4‐Bread had comparable bread quality, loaf volumes, and crumb firmness (Days 0, 1, and 7) as the wheat flour control. The in vitro total dietary fiber analysis of RS4‐Bread yielded a fiber recovery of 90.0%–98.1%, db. RS4‐Enzyme had higher water absorption, longer mixing time, and less elastic dough, but comparable cracker hardness to the control. RS4‐Saltine had a higher water absorption, but lower cracker hardness compared to the control. Fiber recovery of RS4‐Enzyme and RS4‐Saltine crackers were 85.6% and 88.8%, respectively.ConclusionsAnalytical measurements indicated a significant discrepancy in predicting bake mix time and absorption for RS4‐Bread. This research fills gaps in the understanding of low net carb bread, saltine crackers, and enzyme crackers, providing valuable insights into future product development.Significance and NoveltyCombining RS4 and WPI offers potential for health‐promoting, high‐fiber, low net carb products, applicable in various flour‐based foods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用交联磷酸化小麦抗性淀粉 4 型的低净碳水化合物烘焙产品
背景和目的有关高水平交联磷酸化抗性小麦淀粉 4 型(RS4)在烘焙产品中的影响的信息有限。本研究旨在探讨在低净碳水化合物面包(RS4-Bread)、酶制剂饼干(RS4-Enzyme)和盐味饼干(RS4-Saltine)中添加 RS4(64%-83%面粉重量)和小麦分离蛋白(WPI)的影响。研究结果RS4-Bread 的面包质量、面包体积和面包屑硬度(第 0、1 和 7 天)与小麦粉对照组相当。RS4 面包的体外总膳食纤维分析得出的纤维回收率为 90.0%-98.1%(db)。RS4-酶制剂的吸水率较高,搅拌时间较长,面团弹性较差,但饼干硬度与对照组相当。与对照组相比,RS4-盐的吸水率更高,但饼干硬度更低。RS4-Enzyme 和 RS4-Saltine 饼干的纤维回收率分别为 85.6% 和 88.8%。这项研究填补了人们对低净碳水化合物面包、盐饼干和酶制剂饼干的认识空白,为未来的产品开发提供了宝贵的见解。意义和新颖性将 RS4 和 WPI 结合在一起,有望生产出促进健康的高纤维、低净碳水化合物产品,适用于各种面粉食品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cereal Chemistry
Cereal Chemistry 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
110
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Cereal Chemistry publishes high-quality papers reporting novel research and significant conceptual advances in genetics, biotechnology, composition, processing, and utili­zation of cereal grains (barley, maize, millet, oats, rice, rye, sorghum, triticale, and wheat), pulses (beans, lentils, peas, etc.), oil­seeds, and specialty crops (amaranth, flax, quinoa, etc.). Papers advancing grain science in relation to health, nutrition, pet and animal food, and safety, along with new methodologies, instrumentation, and analysis relating to these areas are welcome, as are research notes and topical review papers. The journal generally does not accept papers that focus on nongrain ingredients, technology of a commercial or proprietary nature, or that confirm previous research without extending knowledge. Papers that describe product development should include discussion of underlying theoretical principles.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Changes of gluten protein composition during sourdough fermentation in rye flour A comparative study of RSM and ANN models for predicting spray drying conditions for encapsulation of Lactobacillus casei Differences in physicochemical properties and structure of red sorghum starch: Effect of germination treatments QTL mapping for wheat ferulic acid concentration using 50 K SNP chip in a recombinant inbred line population of Zhongmai 578/Jimai 22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1