Effect of Thread Design Parameters on Central Screw Loosening: A 3D Finite Element Analysis

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering Pub Date : 2024-06-22 DOI:10.1007/s40846-024-00880-w
Liang-wei Xu, Kang-jie Cheng
{"title":"Effect of Thread Design Parameters on Central Screw Loosening: A 3D Finite Element Analysis","authors":"Liang-wei Xu, Kang-jie Cheng","doi":"10.1007/s40846-024-00880-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of thread shape outline, thread pitch and preload on the central screw loosening or fracturing by using 3D finite element (FE) method.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>By using a commercial implant system as prototypes, nine central screw models and matching implant components were created by combinations of two parameters with different values: three screw shapes (triangle, buttress and reverse buttress) and three screw pitches (0.2 mm, 0.3 mm and 0.4 mm). These models were inserted into a bone block. After applying pre-tightening torque to each central screw, a 100 N load tilted at 45 degrees was applied to the abutment to simulate an occlusal load. The stability performance of the central screws was evaluated through FE software.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>For the central screw shape, the highest stress was always located at the level of the first thread, while the highest stress of the reverse buttress group was always located at the level of the second thread. Triangle (average 650 MPa) and reverse buttress (average 729 MPa) threads were more conducive to reducing central screw stress than buttress thread (average 920 MPa). Moreover, it is necessary to avoid thread parameters design with buttress shape/0.3 mm pitch and buttress shape/0.4 mm pitch.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Thread shape outline and thread pitch significantly influenced central screw stability performance. The central screw with a triangle thread shape and a pitch of 0.2 mm presented the best mechanical properties.</p>","PeriodicalId":50133,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-024-00880-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of thread shape outline, thread pitch and preload on the central screw loosening or fracturing by using 3D finite element (FE) method.

Methods

By using a commercial implant system as prototypes, nine central screw models and matching implant components were created by combinations of two parameters with different values: three screw shapes (triangle, buttress and reverse buttress) and three screw pitches (0.2 mm, 0.3 mm and 0.4 mm). These models were inserted into a bone block. After applying pre-tightening torque to each central screw, a 100 N load tilted at 45 degrees was applied to the abutment to simulate an occlusal load. The stability performance of the central screws was evaluated through FE software.

Results

For the central screw shape, the highest stress was always located at the level of the first thread, while the highest stress of the reverse buttress group was always located at the level of the second thread. Triangle (average 650 MPa) and reverse buttress (average 729 MPa) threads were more conducive to reducing central screw stress than buttress thread (average 920 MPa). Moreover, it is necessary to avoid thread parameters design with buttress shape/0.3 mm pitch and buttress shape/0.4 mm pitch.

Conclusion

Thread shape outline and thread pitch significantly influenced central screw stability performance. The central screw with a triangle thread shape and a pitch of 0.2 mm presented the best mechanical properties.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
螺纹设计参数对中心螺丝松动的影响:三维有限元分析
方法 以商业种植体系统为原型,通过两个不同参数值的组合,即三种螺纹形状(三角形、对接形和反对接形)和三种螺纹间距(0.2 毫米、0.3 毫米和 0.4 毫米),创建了九个中心螺纹模型和与之匹配的种植体组件。这些模型被插入骨块中。在对每个中心螺丝施加预紧扭矩后,向基台施加倾斜 45 度的 100 N 负荷以模拟咬合负荷。通过 FE 软件评估了中心螺丝的稳定性能。结果 对于中心螺丝的形状,最高应力总是位于第一螺纹处,而反向对接组的最高应力总是位于第二螺纹处。三角螺纹(平均 650 兆帕)和反向对接螺纹(平均 729 兆帕)比对接螺纹(平均 920 兆帕)更有利于降低中心螺纹应力。结论螺纹形状轮廓和螺纹螺距对中心螺杆的稳定性能有显著影响。螺纹形状为三角形、螺距为 0.2 毫米的中心螺丝具有最佳的机械性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering, JMBE, is committed to encouraging and providing the standard of biomedical engineering. The journal is devoted to publishing papers related to clinical engineering, biomedical signals, medical imaging, bio-informatics, tissue engineering, and so on. Other than the above articles, any contributions regarding hot issues and technological developments that help reach the purpose are also included.
期刊最新文献
Influence of Different Stages of Post-Traumatic Elbow Joint Capsule Healing on Pronation Movement Attribute and Malignancy Analysis of Lung Nodule on Chest CT with Cause-and-Effect Logic Biomechanical Performance of Different Implant Spacings and Placement Angles in Partial Fixed Denture Prosthesis Restorations: A Finite Element Analysis Enhancing Myocardial Infarction Diagnosis: LSTM-based Deep Learning Approach Integrating Echocardiographic Wall Motion Analysis Investigation of Image Quality for Cuboid and Tapered Array microPET Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1