Biomechanical Performance of Different Implant Spacings and Placement Angles in Partial Fixed Denture Prosthesis Restorations: A Finite Element Analysis

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1007/s40846-024-00896-2
Jianguo Zhang, Hu Hou, Peng Chen, Liang Song, Fengling Hu, Youcheng Yu
{"title":"Biomechanical Performance of Different Implant Spacings and Placement Angles in Partial Fixed Denture Prosthesis Restorations: A Finite Element Analysis","authors":"Jianguo Zhang, Hu Hou, Peng Chen, Liang Song, Fengling Hu, Youcheng Yu","doi":"10.1007/s40846-024-00896-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of implant spacing and placement angle on peri-implant bone stress using the finite element method.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>A model of the maxilla of an edentulous patient was obtained by computed tomography, and a splint prosthesis consisting of short or tilted implants was applied to the maxillary posterior region. Three spacings (15, 17, and 19 mm) were used for each restoration, and three placement angles (− 5, 0, and 5 degrees) were available at each spacing. Finite element analysis was used to evaluate the stress distributions and resonant frequencies of all the models by applying both vertical and oblique forces to the splint prostheses simultaneously.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The patters of stress distribution were better in the short implant group (19 mm with a − 5 degree placement angle) and the tilted implant group (19 mm with a 5 degree placement angle). In the short implant group, the difference in cortical bone stress (i.e., the difference between the maximum and minimum principal stresses) decreased from 248 MPa (15 mm, 5 degrees) to 116 MPa (19 mm, − 5 degrees), and the corresponding maximum von Mises stress in the implants was reduced by 35%. The resonance frequency of the short implant group (5300–5500 Hz) was slightly lower than that of the tilted implant group (5400–5700 Hz).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Implant spacing and the placement angle significantly affect the peri-implant bone stress distribution, proper implant placement is essential to minimize this risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":50133,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-024-00896-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of implant spacing and placement angle on peri-implant bone stress using the finite element method.

Methods

A model of the maxilla of an edentulous patient was obtained by computed tomography, and a splint prosthesis consisting of short or tilted implants was applied to the maxillary posterior region. Three spacings (15, 17, and 19 mm) were used for each restoration, and three placement angles (− 5, 0, and 5 degrees) were available at each spacing. Finite element analysis was used to evaluate the stress distributions and resonant frequencies of all the models by applying both vertical and oblique forces to the splint prostheses simultaneously.

Results

The patters of stress distribution were better in the short implant group (19 mm with a − 5 degree placement angle) and the tilted implant group (19 mm with a 5 degree placement angle). In the short implant group, the difference in cortical bone stress (i.e., the difference between the maximum and minimum principal stresses) decreased from 248 MPa (15 mm, 5 degrees) to 116 MPa (19 mm, − 5 degrees), and the corresponding maximum von Mises stress in the implants was reduced by 35%. The resonance frequency of the short implant group (5300–5500 Hz) was slightly lower than that of the tilted implant group (5400–5700 Hz).

Conclusion

Implant spacing and the placement angle significantly affect the peri-implant bone stress distribution, proper implant placement is essential to minimize this risk.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
局部固定义齿修复体中不同种植体间距和植入角度的生物力学性能:有限元分析
方法通过计算机断层扫描获得一名无牙颌患者的上颌骨模型,并在上颌骨后部应用由短种植体或倾斜种植体组成的夹板修复体。每个修复体有三个间距(15、17 和 19 毫米),每个间距有三个植入角度(- 5、0 和 5 度)。结果短种植体组(19 毫米,- 5 度种植角)和倾斜种植体组(19 毫米,5 度种植角)的应力分布模式更好。在短种植体组中,皮质骨应力差(即最大和最小主应力之差)从 248 兆帕(15 毫米,5 度)降至 116 兆帕(19 毫米,- 5 度),种植体中相应的最大冯米塞斯应力降低了 35%。短种植体组的共振频率(5300-5500 Hz)略低于倾斜种植体组(5400-5700 Hz)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering, JMBE, is committed to encouraging and providing the standard of biomedical engineering. The journal is devoted to publishing papers related to clinical engineering, biomedical signals, medical imaging, bio-informatics, tissue engineering, and so on. Other than the above articles, any contributions regarding hot issues and technological developments that help reach the purpose are also included.
期刊最新文献
Influence of Different Stages of Post-Traumatic Elbow Joint Capsule Healing on Pronation Movement Attribute and Malignancy Analysis of Lung Nodule on Chest CT with Cause-and-Effect Logic Biomechanical Performance of Different Implant Spacings and Placement Angles in Partial Fixed Denture Prosthesis Restorations: A Finite Element Analysis Enhancing Myocardial Infarction Diagnosis: LSTM-based Deep Learning Approach Integrating Echocardiographic Wall Motion Analysis Investigation of Image Quality for Cuboid and Tapered Array microPET Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1