Wave of mutilation: Scavenging hermit crabs use social information to locate carcasses

IF 1.3 4区 生物学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Ethology Pub Date : 2024-06-29 DOI:10.1111/eth.13493
Annie Rowe, Arantzazu Pagonabarraga Altisen, Adèle Dubosque, Anna Hills, Akanksha Shah, Anna Vegh, A. Li Veiros, Mike M. Webster
{"title":"Wave of mutilation: Scavenging hermit crabs use social information to locate carcasses","authors":"Annie Rowe,&nbsp;Arantzazu Pagonabarraga Altisen,&nbsp;Adèle Dubosque,&nbsp;Anna Hills,&nbsp;Akanksha Shah,&nbsp;Anna Vegh,&nbsp;A. Li Veiros,&nbsp;Mike M. Webster","doi":"10.1111/eth.13493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Carcasses are patchily distributed and often short-lived resources, placing scavenging animals under pressure to locate them before they rot or are depleted by competitors. Scavengers may search for carcasses directly, or indirectly, using social information. Aggregations of feeding animals and their conspicuous competitive behaviour may be more readily detectable to searching scavengers than the carcass itself. Moreover, the actions of attendant scavengers upon the carcass, breaking it apart and releasing odour or chemical cues, may further enhance its detectability to others foraging nearby. Here we test this idea. In the first of two experiments performed in the field, we found that hermit crabs (<i>Pagurus bernhardus</i>) were attracted to shelled mussels (<i>Mytilus edulis</i>) that other hermit crabs were already feeding on. They showed no strong tendency to approach aggregations of conspecifics in the absence of food, nor conspecifics that were confined close to mussels but prevented from feeding on them. We speculated that through breaking up the carcass, the feeding hermit crabs released chemical cues and drifting particles of mussel tissue that further attracted other hermit crabs. We tested this in a second experiment, finding that finely chopped mussels attracted significantly more hermit crabs than did intact mussels. We suggest that scavenger feeding action upon carcasses makes these more detectable to others by releasing odour and particle plumes, a form of inadvertently produced social information.</p>","PeriodicalId":50494,"journal":{"name":"Ethology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eth.13493","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eth.13493","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Carcasses are patchily distributed and often short-lived resources, placing scavenging animals under pressure to locate them before they rot or are depleted by competitors. Scavengers may search for carcasses directly, or indirectly, using social information. Aggregations of feeding animals and their conspicuous competitive behaviour may be more readily detectable to searching scavengers than the carcass itself. Moreover, the actions of attendant scavengers upon the carcass, breaking it apart and releasing odour or chemical cues, may further enhance its detectability to others foraging nearby. Here we test this idea. In the first of two experiments performed in the field, we found that hermit crabs (Pagurus bernhardus) were attracted to shelled mussels (Mytilus edulis) that other hermit crabs were already feeding on. They showed no strong tendency to approach aggregations of conspecifics in the absence of food, nor conspecifics that were confined close to mussels but prevented from feeding on them. We speculated that through breaking up the carcass, the feeding hermit crabs released chemical cues and drifting particles of mussel tissue that further attracted other hermit crabs. We tested this in a second experiment, finding that finely chopped mussels attracted significantly more hermit crabs than did intact mussels. We suggest that scavenger feeding action upon carcasses makes these more detectable to others by releasing odour and particle plumes, a form of inadvertently produced social information.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肢解浪潮食腐寄居蟹利用社会信息确定尸体位置
尸体分布零散,而且往往是短暂的资源,这给食腐动物带来了压力,它们必须在尸体腐烂或被竞争对手耗尽之前找到尸体。食腐动物可以直接或间接地利用社会信息搜寻尸体。觅食动物的聚集及其明显的竞争行为可能比尸体本身更容易被食腐动物发现。此外,随行食腐动物将尸体打碎并释放气味或化学线索的行为,可能会进一步提高附近觅食动物的可探测性。在这里,我们对这一想法进行了验证。在两次野外实验中的第一次实验中,我们发现寄居蟹(Pagurus bernhardus)会被其他寄居蟹已经在觅食的带壳贻贝(Mytilus edulis)所吸引。在没有食物的情况下,寄居蟹并没有表现出接近同种寄居蟹聚集地的强烈倾向,也没有表现出接近被限制在贻贝附近但无法捕食贻贝的同种寄居蟹的强烈倾向。我们推测,吃食的寄居蟹通过打碎贻贝尸体,释放出化学线索和贻贝组织漂流颗粒,进一步吸引了其他寄居蟹。我们在第二个实验中测试了这一点,发现切碎的贻贝比完整的贻贝能吸引更多的寄居蟹。我们认为,食腐动物对尸体的取食行为会释放出气味和颗粒羽流,从而使其他寄居蟹更容易发现这些尸体,这是一种无意中产生的社会信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ethology
Ethology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
89
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International in scope, Ethology publishes original research on behaviour including physiological mechanisms, function, and evolution. The Journal addresses behaviour in all species, from slime moulds to humans. Experimental research is preferred, both from the field and the lab, which is grounded in a theoretical framework. The section ''Perspectives and Current Debates'' provides an overview of the field and may include theoretical investigations and essays on controversial topics.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Male and female age affects the reproductive potential of two tephritid flies Intra‐individual modulations and inter‐individual variations of female signals in the domestic canary (Serinus canaria) Polistes dominula spatial learning abilities while foraging Male–female chemical interactions in a facultatively parthenogenetic stick insect
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1