<p>A highlight of visiting a tropical rainforest is watching iridescent butterflies passing by, flashing their colours in the sunlight that makes it to the forest floor. It can be quite tricky to keep track of such a butterfly because typically only the upper side of the wings is iridescent, so that the colour only flashes when this side of a wing can be seen. People think that this kind of moving flash coloration makes it difficult for visual predators to follow the flight path of the butterfly. Hence, iridescent colours may help butterflies to distract predators. Computer simulations and experiments with humans as ‘predators’ suggest that this may be true, but as of now the flash colouration hypothesis had not been tested for real.</p><p>In this issue of Ethology, Vieira-Silva et al. (<span>2024</span>) conducted a series of clever experiments to finally test the flash colouration hypothesis in <i>Morpho helena</i> butterflies. This species displays an iridescent blue colour on the upper side of its wings (as can be seen on this issues' cover image) that flashes when they move through the forest.</p><p>In a first experiment, the authors painted the cryptic underside of the wings with a colour mimicking the iridescent blue of the upper side of the wing. Thereby, the butterflies become more constantly visible during flight, because now the blue colour is exposed all of the time. The underside of the wings of a control group got painted with a brown colour similar to the original cryptic colour, thereby controlling for the effect of catching and painting the butterflies. In a capture–recapture analysis, Vieira-Silva et al. (<span>2024</span>) found that blue-coloured butterflies were less likely to be seen again compared to the brown-coloured control individuals. Because <i>Morpho helena</i> butterflies do not move around far, the most parsimonious explanation for the lower resighting rates of the blue-coloured butterflies is that a higher proportion of them got eaten by predators.</p><p>In a second experiment, Vieira-Silva et al. (<span>2024</span>) tested if an overall cryptic colour as such would have reduced predation. To test this, they coloured the upper side of the wing—which normally has the blue flashing colouration—with brown colour, so that the butterflies become completely cryptic during flight. This treatment, however, did not affect recapture rates, suggesting that completely cryptic butterflies did not have an advantage over individuals that flashed their blue colour during flight. Hence, the distraction effect of a flashing blue colour likely has a similar effect than complete crypsis.</p><p>To show that the higher predation of butterflies with an underside coloured in blue was really due to moving butterflies and not because such butterflies became generally more visible to predators, the authors conducted a third experiment. To test if blue colouration affected predation in non-moving butterflies, they compared how likely dead mo
{"title":"A Butterfly's Flash Coloration Distracts Predators—Read Future Textbook Knowledge in Ethology","authors":"Wolfgang Goymann","doi":"10.1111/eth.13520","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.13520","url":null,"abstract":"<p>A highlight of visiting a tropical rainforest is watching iridescent butterflies passing by, flashing their colours in the sunlight that makes it to the forest floor. It can be quite tricky to keep track of such a butterfly because typically only the upper side of the wings is iridescent, so that the colour only flashes when this side of a wing can be seen. People think that this kind of moving flash coloration makes it difficult for visual predators to follow the flight path of the butterfly. Hence, iridescent colours may help butterflies to distract predators. Computer simulations and experiments with humans as ‘predators’ suggest that this may be true, but as of now the flash colouration hypothesis had not been tested for real.</p><p>In this issue of Ethology, Vieira-Silva et al. (<span>2024</span>) conducted a series of clever experiments to finally test the flash colouration hypothesis in <i>Morpho helena</i> butterflies. This species displays an iridescent blue colour on the upper side of its wings (as can be seen on this issues' cover image) that flashes when they move through the forest.</p><p>In a first experiment, the authors painted the cryptic underside of the wings with a colour mimicking the iridescent blue of the upper side of the wing. Thereby, the butterflies become more constantly visible during flight, because now the blue colour is exposed all of the time. The underside of the wings of a control group got painted with a brown colour similar to the original cryptic colour, thereby controlling for the effect of catching and painting the butterflies. In a capture–recapture analysis, Vieira-Silva et al. (<span>2024</span>) found that blue-coloured butterflies were less likely to be seen again compared to the brown-coloured control individuals. Because <i>Morpho helena</i> butterflies do not move around far, the most parsimonious explanation for the lower resighting rates of the blue-coloured butterflies is that a higher proportion of them got eaten by predators.</p><p>In a second experiment, Vieira-Silva et al. (<span>2024</span>) tested if an overall cryptic colour as such would have reduced predation. To test this, they coloured the upper side of the wing—which normally has the blue flashing colouration—with brown colour, so that the butterflies become completely cryptic during flight. This treatment, however, did not affect recapture rates, suggesting that completely cryptic butterflies did not have an advantage over individuals that flashed their blue colour during flight. Hence, the distraction effect of a flashing blue colour likely has a similar effect than complete crypsis.</p><p>To show that the higher predation of butterflies with an underside coloured in blue was really due to moving butterflies and not because such butterflies became generally more visible to predators, the authors conducted a third experiment. To test if blue colouration affected predation in non-moving butterflies, they compared how likely dead mo","PeriodicalId":50494,"journal":{"name":"Ethology","volume":"130 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eth.13520","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142641184","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Javier Sierro, Diego Gil, Pedro Sáez-Gómez, Paula Hidalgo-Rodríguez, Julio Rabadán-González, Carlos Camacho
Predatory interactions result in strong selection pressures acting on multiple aspects of animal behaviour. Anti-predator strategies are therefore common in most animals, typically signalling at various stages of a predation event. Many species of caprimulgids perform conspicuous anti-predator displays, including stereotyped behaviours and vocal signals. Here, we described distress calls of red-necked nightjars (Caprimulgus ruficollis), produced when birds are trapped and unable to escape during a predatory interaction. Distress calls are harsh, low-frequency guttural vocalisations with irregular amplitude modulations. The age and sex of birds partially explained the acoustic variation observed, whereas size-related morphological features were poor predictors of the acoustic structure. Age-sex differences in distress calls may respond to physiological constraints associated with sexual dimorphism and/or developmental variation. Alternatively, directional selection associated with differential predation risk on each age-sex class may have resulted in the observed differences in distress calls. The extremely deep voice and the harsh quality of distress calls fit the structure of aggressive signals and may resemble those produced by a larger animal. We propose that these calls serve as a last resort strategy to reduce post-encounter risk of predation, either as a startling effect to facilitate escape or to attract other predators that could intimidate the captor.
{"title":"Call for Your Life: Acoustic Structure and Age-Sex Differences in Distress Calls of Red-Necked Nightjars","authors":"Javier Sierro, Diego Gil, Pedro Sáez-Gómez, Paula Hidalgo-Rodríguez, Julio Rabadán-González, Carlos Camacho","doi":"10.1111/eth.13513","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.13513","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Predatory interactions result in strong selection pressures acting on multiple aspects of animal behaviour. Anti-predator strategies are therefore common in most animals, typically signalling at various stages of a predation event. Many species of caprimulgids perform conspicuous anti-predator displays, including stereotyped behaviours and vocal signals. Here, we described distress calls of red-necked nightjars (<i>Caprimulgus ruficollis</i>), produced when birds are trapped and unable to escape during a predatory interaction. Distress calls are harsh, low-frequency guttural vocalisations with irregular amplitude modulations. The age and sex of birds partially explained the acoustic variation observed, whereas size-related morphological features were poor predictors of the acoustic structure. Age-sex differences in distress calls may respond to physiological constraints associated with sexual dimorphism and/or developmental variation. Alternatively, directional selection associated with differential predation risk on each age-sex class may have resulted in the observed differences in distress calls. The extremely deep voice and the harsh quality of distress calls fit the structure of aggressive signals and may resemble those produced by a larger animal. We propose that these calls serve as a last resort strategy to reduce post-encounter risk of predation, either as a startling effect to facilitate escape or to attract other predators that could intimidate the captor.</p>","PeriodicalId":50494,"journal":{"name":"Ethology","volume":"130 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eth.13513","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142642365","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}