Improved Parker-Oldenburg method and its application to Moho topographic inversion in the northern South China Sea

IF 2.8 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Geophysical Journal International Pub Date : 2024-06-24 DOI:10.1093/gji/ggae224
Hangtao Yu, Pengbo Qin, Chuang Xu, Hui Zhang, Yi Chai, Ranran Du
{"title":"Improved Parker-Oldenburg method and its application to Moho topographic inversion in the northern South China Sea","authors":"Hangtao Yu, Pengbo Qin, Chuang Xu, Hui Zhang, Yi Chai, Ranran Du","doi":"10.1093/gji/ggae224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Before inverting Moho topography, the traditional Parker-Oldenburg method requires the determination of two important hyperparameters, the average Moho depth and Moho density contrast. The selection of these two hyperparameters will directly affect the inversion results. In this paper, a new method for estimating hyperparameters is proposed which is used to improve the Parker-Oldenburg method. The new method is improved by using simulated annealing to accurately estimate the average Moho depth and Moho density contrast based on the relationship between Moho depths and corresponding gravity anomalies at seismic control points. Synthetic tests show that compared to the improved Bott's method and the trial and error method, our method reduces the error in Moho density contrast and average Moho depth by 0.83% and 1.81% respectively. In addition, compared with the trial and error method, our method greatly improves the computational efficiency. In a practical example, we apply this method to invert the Moho topography in the northern South China Sea. The inversion results show that the Moho topography in the northern South China Sea ranges from 8.2 to 33 km. The root mean squared error between our Moho topography and the seismic validation points is 0.94 km. Compared with the CRUST 1.0 model, our Moho topography is more accurate.","PeriodicalId":12519,"journal":{"name":"Geophysical Journal International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysical Journal International","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae224","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary Before inverting Moho topography, the traditional Parker-Oldenburg method requires the determination of two important hyperparameters, the average Moho depth and Moho density contrast. The selection of these two hyperparameters will directly affect the inversion results. In this paper, a new method for estimating hyperparameters is proposed which is used to improve the Parker-Oldenburg method. The new method is improved by using simulated annealing to accurately estimate the average Moho depth and Moho density contrast based on the relationship between Moho depths and corresponding gravity anomalies at seismic control points. Synthetic tests show that compared to the improved Bott's method and the trial and error method, our method reduces the error in Moho density contrast and average Moho depth by 0.83% and 1.81% respectively. In addition, compared with the trial and error method, our method greatly improves the computational efficiency. In a practical example, we apply this method to invert the Moho topography in the northern South China Sea. The inversion results show that the Moho topography in the northern South China Sea ranges from 8.2 to 33 km. The root mean squared error between our Moho topography and the seismic validation points is 0.94 km. Compared with the CRUST 1.0 model, our Moho topography is more accurate.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改进的帕克-奥尔登堡方法及其在南海北部莫霍地形反演中的应用
摘要 在反演莫霍地形之前,传统的帕克-奥尔登堡方法需要确定两个重要的超参数,即平均莫霍深度和莫霍密度对比度。这两个超参数的选择将直接影响反演结果。本文提出了一种估算超参数的新方法,用于改进 Parker-Oldenburg 方法。新方法通过模拟退火进行改进,根据地震控制点的莫霍深度和相应重力异常之间的关系,准确估计平均莫霍深度和莫霍密度对比。合成试验表明,与改进的 Bott's 方法和试错法相比,我们的方法将莫霍密度对比度和平均莫霍深度的误差分别降低了 0.83% 和 1.81%。此外,与试错法相比,我们的方法大大提高了计算效率。在一个实际例子中,我们应用该方法反演了南海北部的莫霍地形。反演结果表明,南海北部莫霍地形的范围在 8.2 至 33 千米之间。莫霍地形与地震验证点的均方根误差为 0.94 km。与 CRUST 1.0 模型相比,我们的莫霍地形更为精确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geophysical Journal International
Geophysical Journal International 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
10.70%
发文量
436
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Geophysical Journal International publishes top quality research papers, express letters, invited review papers and book reviews on all aspects of theoretical, computational, applied and observational geophysics.
期刊最新文献
Leveraging the ETAS model to forecast mining microseismicity Scaling of the geomagnetic secular variation time scale Enhancing computational efficiency in 3-D seismic modelling with half-precision floating-point numbers based on the curvilinear grid finite-difference method Improving signal-to-noise ratios of ambient noise cross-correlation functions using local attributes Azimuth correction for passive surface wave dispersion based on polarization analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1