REDD+ organisational arrangements and potential for sectoral integration: Evidence from Cameroon

IF 3 3区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environmental Policy and Governance Pub Date : 2024-06-28 DOI:10.1002/eet.2120
Josiane Gakou‐Kakeu, Monica Di Gregorio, Jouni Paavola, Denis Jean Sonwa
{"title":"REDD+ organisational arrangements and potential for sectoral integration: Evidence from Cameroon","authors":"Josiane Gakou‐Kakeu, Monica Di Gregorio, Jouni Paavola, Denis Jean Sonwa","doi":"10.1002/eet.2120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The organisational arrangements of the <jats:italic>Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation</jats:italic> (REDD+) mechanism have been scrutinised for their capacity to support emissions reduction and promote local stakeholder participation. Yet, whether they facilitate REDD+ integration into land use sectors driving deforestation has received little attention. We assess the potential of the organisational arrangements of the Cameroonian REDD+ scheme to support sectoral integration. We draw on analysis of documentary material and conceptual literature on organisational structures for environmental integration, which distinguishes horizontal and vertical integration mechanisms with distinct features and potentials to foster integration. Our analysis reveals that the Cameroonian REDD+ scheme chaired by the environmental department and featuring a multisectoral steering committee aligns with horizontal integration. Such arrangements would infuse the REDD+ mechanism with the technical expertise of the leading department, but expose REDD+ integration to sectoral resistance and funding challenges because of the limited institutional leverage of the environmental department. The organisational reforms proposed by the national REDD+ strategy featuring the Prime Minister's leadership of the REDD+ process might enhance political support for REDD+ integration, but could expose REDD+ development to the vagaries of political shifts. We propose a hybrid organisational arrangement combining horizontal and vertical integration mechanisms, with the potential to minimise their respective weaknesses, maximise their strengths, and enhance REDD+ integration into land‐use sectors. We recommend further feasibility analyses into the applicability of the proposed arrangement to other settings.","PeriodicalId":47396,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Policy and Governance","volume":"107 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Policy and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.2120","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The organisational arrangements of the Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation (REDD+) mechanism have been scrutinised for their capacity to support emissions reduction and promote local stakeholder participation. Yet, whether they facilitate REDD+ integration into land use sectors driving deforestation has received little attention. We assess the potential of the organisational arrangements of the Cameroonian REDD+ scheme to support sectoral integration. We draw on analysis of documentary material and conceptual literature on organisational structures for environmental integration, which distinguishes horizontal and vertical integration mechanisms with distinct features and potentials to foster integration. Our analysis reveals that the Cameroonian REDD+ scheme chaired by the environmental department and featuring a multisectoral steering committee aligns with horizontal integration. Such arrangements would infuse the REDD+ mechanism with the technical expertise of the leading department, but expose REDD+ integration to sectoral resistance and funding challenges because of the limited institutional leverage of the environmental department. The organisational reforms proposed by the national REDD+ strategy featuring the Prime Minister's leadership of the REDD+ process might enhance political support for REDD+ integration, but could expose REDD+ development to the vagaries of political shifts. We propose a hybrid organisational arrangement combining horizontal and vertical integration mechanisms, with the potential to minimise their respective weaknesses, maximise their strengths, and enhance REDD+ integration into land‐use sectors. We recommend further feasibility analyses into the applicability of the proposed arrangement to other settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
REDD+ 的组织安排和部门整合潜力:喀麦隆的证据
降低因森林砍伐和退化所产生的排放(REDD+)机制的组织安排因其支持减排和促进当地利益相关者参与的能力而备受关注。然而,这些机制是否有助于将 REDD+ 纳入导致森林砍伐的土地使用部门却很少受到关注。我们评估了喀麦隆 REDD+ 计划的组织安排在支持部门整合方面的潜力。我们借鉴了有关环境整合组织结构的文献资料分析和概念性文献,其中区分了横向和纵向整合机制,这两种机制具有不同的特点和促进整合的潜力。我们的分析表明,喀麦隆 REDD+ 计划由环境部门主持,并设有一个多部门指导委员会,符合横向一体化的要求。这种安排将为 REDD+ 机制注入领导部门的技术专长,但由于环境部门的机构影响力有限,REDD+ 整合面临部门阻力和资金挑战。国家 REDD+ 战略提出的组织改革,以总理领导 REDD+ 进程为特点,可能会加强对 REDD+ 整合的政治支持,但可能会使 REDD+ 的发展受到政治变化无常的影响。我们提出了一种结合横向和纵向整合机制的混合组织安排,它有可能最大限度地减少各自的弱点,最大限度地发挥各自的优势,并加强 REDD+ 与土地使用部门的整合。我们建议对拟议安排在其他环境中的适用性进行进一步的可行性分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Policy and Governance
Environmental Policy and Governance ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Environmental Policy and Governance is an international, inter-disciplinary journal affiliated with the European Society for Ecological Economics (ESEE). The journal seeks to advance interdisciplinary environmental research and its use to support novel solutions in environmental policy and governance. The journal publishes innovative, high quality articles which examine, or are relevant to, the environmental policies that are introduced by governments or the diverse forms of environmental governance that emerge in markets and civil society. The journal includes papers that examine how different forms of policy and governance emerge and exert influence at scales ranging from local to global and in diverse developmental and environmental contexts.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Between science, authority, and responsibility: Exploring institutional logics to rethink climate governance Playing the CITES game: Lessons on global conservation governance from African megafauna Illuminating the collective learning continuum in the Colorado River Basin Science‐Policy Forums Achieving economy‐wide gains from residential energy efficiency improvements: The importance of timing and funding approach in driving the transition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1