Evolving preferences in sustainable transportation: a comparative analysis of consumer segments for electric vehicles across Europe

IF 2.9 Q2 MANAGEMENT Social Responsibility Journal Pub Date : 2024-06-20 DOI:10.1108/srj-12-2023-0713
Yavuz Selim Balcioglu, Bülent Sezen, Ali Ulvi İşler
{"title":"Evolving preferences in sustainable transportation: a comparative analysis of consumer segments for electric vehicles across Europe","authors":"Yavuz Selim Balcioglu, Bülent Sezen, Ali Ulvi İşler","doi":"10.1108/srj-12-2023-0713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study aims to explore and segment consumer preferences for electric and hybrid vehicles in Germany, Sweden, the Netherlands and Turkey, focusing on understanding the various factors that influence consumer decisions in these markets.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Using latent class analysis (LCA) on data collected through online surveys and discrete choice experiments, this research categorizes consumers into distinct segments. The approach allows for a nuanced understanding of how various factors such as income level, fuel cost, age, CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, purchase price, vehicle range, policy policies and environmental concerns interact with shape consumer preferences.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The analysis uncovers significant heterogeneity in consumer preferences for electric and hybrid vehicles across Germany, Sweden, the Netherlands and Turkey, revealing four key segments: “Eco-Driven Innovators,” “Value-Focused Pragmatists,” “Tech-Savvy Early Adopters” and “Reluctant Traditionalists.” “Eco-Driven Innovators” prioritize environmental benefits and are less sensitive to price, demonstrating a strong inclination toward vehicle CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and policy policies. “Value-Focused Pragmatists” weigh economic factors heavily, showing a sharp interest in fuel costs and purchase prices but are open to considering electric and hybrid vehicles if they present clear long-term savings. Technology-savvy early adopters are attracted by the latest technological advancements in vehicles, regardless of the type, and are motivated by factors beyond just environmental concerns or cost savings. Lastly, “Reluctant Traditionalists” exhibit minimal interest in electric and hybrid vehicles due to concerns over charging infrastructure and upfront costs. This detailed segmentation illustrates the diverse motivations and barriers influencing consumer choices, from governmental policies and environmental concerns to individual financial considerations and technological appeal.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study stands out for its pioneering application of LCA to dissect the complexity of consumer preferences for electric and hybrid vehicles, a methodological approach not widely used in this research domain. Using LCA, the authors are able to uncover nuanced consumer segments, each with distinct preferences and motivations, providing a depth of insight into market dynamics that traditional analysis methods may overlook. This approach enables a more granular understanding of how diverse factors – ranging from environmental concerns to economic considerations and technological attributes – interact to shape consumer choices in different countries. The findings not only fill a critical gap in the existing literature by mapping the intricate landscape of consumer preferences, but also offer a novel perspective on strategizing market interventions. Therefore, the application of LCA enriches the discourse on sustainable transportation, offering stakeholders, manufacturers, policymakers and researchers – a refined toolkit for navigating the evolving market dynamics and fostering the adoption of electric and hybrid vehicles.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47615,"journal":{"name":"Social Responsibility Journal","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Responsibility Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/srj-12-2023-0713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to explore and segment consumer preferences for electric and hybrid vehicles in Germany, Sweden, the Netherlands and Turkey, focusing on understanding the various factors that influence consumer decisions in these markets.

Design/methodology/approach

Using latent class analysis (LCA) on data collected through online surveys and discrete choice experiments, this research categorizes consumers into distinct segments. The approach allows for a nuanced understanding of how various factors such as income level, fuel cost, age, CO2 emissions, purchase price, vehicle range, policy policies and environmental concerns interact with shape consumer preferences.

Findings

The analysis uncovers significant heterogeneity in consumer preferences for electric and hybrid vehicles across Germany, Sweden, the Netherlands and Turkey, revealing four key segments: “Eco-Driven Innovators,” “Value-Focused Pragmatists,” “Tech-Savvy Early Adopters” and “Reluctant Traditionalists.” “Eco-Driven Innovators” prioritize environmental benefits and are less sensitive to price, demonstrating a strong inclination toward vehicle CO2 emissions and policy policies. “Value-Focused Pragmatists” weigh economic factors heavily, showing a sharp interest in fuel costs and purchase prices but are open to considering electric and hybrid vehicles if they present clear long-term savings. Technology-savvy early adopters are attracted by the latest technological advancements in vehicles, regardless of the type, and are motivated by factors beyond just environmental concerns or cost savings. Lastly, “Reluctant Traditionalists” exhibit minimal interest in electric and hybrid vehicles due to concerns over charging infrastructure and upfront costs. This detailed segmentation illustrates the diverse motivations and barriers influencing consumer choices, from governmental policies and environmental concerns to individual financial considerations and technological appeal.

Originality/value

This study stands out for its pioneering application of LCA to dissect the complexity of consumer preferences for electric and hybrid vehicles, a methodological approach not widely used in this research domain. Using LCA, the authors are able to uncover nuanced consumer segments, each with distinct preferences and motivations, providing a depth of insight into market dynamics that traditional analysis methods may overlook. This approach enables a more granular understanding of how diverse factors – ranging from environmental concerns to economic considerations and technological attributes – interact to shape consumer choices in different countries. The findings not only fill a critical gap in the existing literature by mapping the intricate landscape of consumer preferences, but also offer a novel perspective on strategizing market interventions. Therefore, the application of LCA enriches the discourse on sustainable transportation, offering stakeholders, manufacturers, policymakers and researchers – a refined toolkit for navigating the evolving market dynamics and fostering the adoption of electric and hybrid vehicles.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可持续交通中不断变化的偏好:对欧洲电动汽车消费者群体的比较分析
目的本研究旨在探索和细分德国、瑞典、荷兰和土耳其消费者对电动汽车和混合动力汽车的偏好,重点了解影响这些市场消费者决策的各种因素。研究结果分析揭示了德国、瑞典、荷兰和土耳其消费者对电动汽车和混合动力汽车偏好的显著异质性,揭示了四个关键细分市场:"生态驱动型创新者"、"注重价值的实用主义者"、"精通技术的早期采用者 "和 "不情愿的传统主义者"。"生态驱动型创新者 "优先考虑环境效益,对价格不太敏感,表现出对汽车二氧化碳排放和政策的强烈倾向。"注重价值的实用主义者 "非常重视经济因素,对燃料成本和购买价格表现出浓厚的兴趣,但如果电动汽车和混合动力汽车能带来明显的长期节约,他们也愿意考虑。精通技术的早期采用者被车辆的最新技术进步所吸引,无论其类型如何,他们的动机不仅仅是环保或节约成本。最后,"不情愿的传统主义者 "由于担心充电基础设施和前期成本,对电动汽车和混合动力汽车兴趣不大。这种详细的细分说明了影响消费者选择的各种动机和障碍,从政府政策和环境问题到个人经济考虑和技术吸引力。 原创性/价值 本研究的突出之处在于它开创性地应用了生命周期分析来剖析消费者对电动汽车和混合动力汽车偏好的复杂性,这种方法在该研究领域并未得到广泛应用。利用生命周期评估,作者能够发现细微的消费者群体,每个群体都有不同的偏好和动机,从而深入了解市场动态,而传统的分析方法可能会忽略这一点。通过这种方法,可以更细致地了解从环境问题到经济因素和技术属性等各种因素是如何相互作用,形成不同国家消费者的选择的。研究结果不仅填补了现有文献中的一个重要空白,描绘了消费者偏好的复杂面貌,还为制定市场干预战略提供了一个新的视角。因此,生命周期评估的应用丰富了有关可持续交通的论述,为利益相关者、制造商、政策制定者和研究人员提供了一个完善的工具包,帮助他们驾驭不断变化的市场动态,促进电动汽车和混合动力汽车的采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: The Social Responsibility Journal, the official journal of the Social Responsibility Research Network, is interdisciplinary in its scope and encourages submissions from any discipline or any part of the world which addresses any element of the journal''s aims. The journal encompasses the full range of theoretical, methodological and substantive debates in the area of social responsibility. Contributions which address the link between different disciplines and / or implications for societal, organisational or individual behavior are especially encouraged. The journal publishes theoretical and empirical papers, speculative essays and review articles. The journal also publishes special themed issues under the guidance of a guest editor. Coverage: Accountability and accounting- Issues concerning sustainability- Economy and finance- Governance- Stakeholder interactions- Ecology and environment- Corporate activity and behaviour- Ethics and morality- Governmental and trans-governmental regulation- Globalisation and disintermediation- Individuals and corporate citizenship- Transparency and disclosure- Consumption and its consequences- Corporate and other forms of organization
期刊最新文献
Internal CSR and the decline of organised labour: a possible elective affinity? The effect of natural disasters on food security in Sub-Saharan Africa Fighting fire with apathy – understanding managers’ perception of the natural environment as a stakeholder in the aftermath of a natural disaster Sustainable consumption behavior among Bahraini young female consumers Killing two birds with one stone: gender diversity, information disclosures and financial distress
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1