Effectiveness of Interventions for Cognitive Processing in Body Dysmorphic Disorder and Body Dissatisfaction: Systematic Review

IF 2.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Cognitive Therapy and Research Pub Date : 2024-06-18 DOI:10.1007/s10608-024-10499-5
Olga López-Martín, Artemisa Rocha Dores, Miguel Peixoto, António Marques
{"title":"Effectiveness of Interventions for Cognitive Processing in Body Dysmorphic Disorder and Body Dissatisfaction: Systematic Review","authors":"Olga López-Martín, Artemisa Rocha Dores, Miguel Peixoto, António Marques","doi":"10.1007/s10608-024-10499-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD) is characterised by an appearance-related cognitive deficit based on distorted ideas and beliefs about one’s own body. These lead to high body dissatisfaction (BD), which affects attention, cognitive processing and behaviour.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objective</h3><p>The aim of this review was to systematically examine the evidence for the effectiveness of psychological interventions to improve cognitive impairments in BDD and high BD.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Method</h3><p>The systematic review report followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and MetaAnalyses (PRISMA) statement. The databases Pubmed, WOS, Scopus and EBSCO were searched, yielding a total of 2,153 records. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 10 articles, published until September 2023, were selected. Eligible studies were assessed for potential risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment Review Manager (RevMan) tool for the Randomized Controlled Trials and ROBINS-I tool for non-randomized studies.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The results suggest that psychological interventions can reduce cognitive deficits in BDD. However, the results are supported by a limited number of very diverse studies, conducted with non-clinical, small samples, few sessions and an overall moderate risk of bias.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Further research is needed to confirm the efficacy of psychological interventions on cognitive deficits in BDD.</p>","PeriodicalId":48316,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Therapy and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Therapy and Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-024-10499-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD) is characterised by an appearance-related cognitive deficit based on distorted ideas and beliefs about one’s own body. These lead to high body dissatisfaction (BD), which affects attention, cognitive processing and behaviour.

Objective

The aim of this review was to systematically examine the evidence for the effectiveness of psychological interventions to improve cognitive impairments in BDD and high BD.

Method

The systematic review report followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and MetaAnalyses (PRISMA) statement. The databases Pubmed, WOS, Scopus and EBSCO were searched, yielding a total of 2,153 records. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 10 articles, published until September 2023, were selected. Eligible studies were assessed for potential risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment Review Manager (RevMan) tool for the Randomized Controlled Trials and ROBINS-I tool for non-randomized studies.

Results

The results suggest that psychological interventions can reduce cognitive deficits in BDD. However, the results are supported by a limited number of very diverse studies, conducted with non-clinical, small samples, few sessions and an overall moderate risk of bias.

Conclusions

Further research is needed to confirm the efficacy of psychological interventions on cognitive deficits in BDD.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
身体畸形障碍和身体不满意的认知处理干预效果:系统回顾
背景身体畸形障碍(Body Dysmorphic Disorder,BDD)的特征是与外貌相关的认知缺陷,这种缺陷基于对自己身体的扭曲想法和信念。本综述旨在系统研究心理干预对改善 BDD 和高度 BD 患者认知障碍的有效性。检索了 Pubmed、WOS、Scopus 和 EBSCO 等数据库,共获得 2,153 条记录。在应用纳入和排除标准后,选出了 10 篇文章,这些文章的出版日期截止到 2023 年 9 月。对符合条件的研究采用科克伦偏倚风险评估审查管理器(RevMan)工具对随机对照试验进行潜在偏倚风险评估,采用 ROBINS-I 工具对非随机研究进行潜在偏倚风险评估。然而,这些结果得到了数量有限、非常多样的研究的支持,这些研究都是以非临床、小样本、少疗程和总体中度偏倚风险的方式进行的。结论需要进一步的研究来证实心理干预对 BDD 认知缺陷的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Cognitive Therapy and Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Cognitive Therapy and Research (COTR) focuses on the investigation of cognitive processes in human adaptation and adjustment and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). It is an interdisciplinary journal welcoming submissions from diverse areas of psychology, including cognitive, clinical, developmental, experimental, personality, social, learning, affective neuroscience, emotion research, therapy mechanism, and pharmacotherapy.
期刊最新文献
Lay Theories for Social Anxiety: Examining the Impact of Viewing Social Anxiety as Malleable Due to Personal Effort versus Fixed in Nature in a Non-clinical Sample Training to Increase Processing of Positive Content Paradoxically Decreases Positive Memory Bias in High Levels of Depression Associations Between Self-Criticism, Basic Psychological Needs Frustration, and Self-Damaging Behaviors: An Application of Self-Determination Theory Relapse prevention following guided self-help for common health problems: A Scoping Review Specificity of Emotion Regulation Processes in Depression: A Network Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1