What is important in forensic psychiatric evaluation in people with Down syndrome? A sample from Türkiye

Muhammed Emin Boylu, İlker Taşdemir, Mehmet Doğan, Alaattin Duran
{"title":"What is important in forensic psychiatric evaluation in people with Down syndrome? A sample from Türkiye","authors":"Muhammed Emin Boylu, İlker Taşdemir, Mehmet Doğan, Alaattin Duran","doi":"10.1108/jidob-11-2023-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Down syndrome is one of the common genetic causes of intellectual disability. Adult with Down syndrome may have many psychiatric comorbidities. Therefore, their mental health status should be considered in legal proceedings such as criminal responsibility and legal capacity where they are involved. This study aims to highlight that individuals with Down syndrome are often referred directly to forensic psychiatry without undergoing an interview, despite the fact that this is a group with varied mental statuses.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This study analysed the socio-demographic, clinical and forensic characteristics of eight adult individuals with Down syndrome for whom the Council of Forensic Medicine (CFM) requested an opinion on criminal liability and other legal situations between 2018 and 2022. The CFM is an authoritative institution to which cases from all areas of Türkiye are referred.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The mean age of the individuals with Down syndrome for whom a forensic psychiatric opinion was requested was 24.63 (±7.95) and the mean IQ level was 54.13 (±13.38). All cases were male, 6 / 8 were referred for assessment of criminal responsibility and 4 / 6 of those referred for assessment of criminal responsibility were referred for sexual offences. It was found that 5 / 8 of the cases had moderate intellectual disability and 3 / 8 of the cases had mild intellectual disability.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>Regarding the limitations of this study, the first one is the small sample size. Nevertheless, due to the low prevalence of people with Down syndrome in society, it is plausible that their stigmatization may not be reflected in the judicial system, even in cases involving violent behaviour. The second limitation is that the reports lack all psychiatric medical documents, including forensic psychiatric evaluations of individuals with Down syndrome. Additionally, additional diseases were recorded based on familial anamnesis. The third limitation is that this study is the first publication to investigate Down syndrome from a forensic psychiatric perspective. Thus, there is a lack of literature to make direct comparisons and references in the discussion section.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Social implications</h3>\n<p>This is the first study about forensic psychiatric aspects for people with Down syndrome. The aim of this study was to examine the forensic psychiatric approach in Down syndrome, one of the most common genetic causes of intellectual disability, the situations in which forensic psychiatric assessment is required and the issues that might be considered important in this regard. Although there are various publications in the literature on the psychiatric conditions of individuals with Down syndrome, to our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate individuals with Down syndrome in terms of forensic psychiatric evaluation. People with Down syndrome are known to have varying degrees of intellectual disability and different types of psychiatric comorbidity.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>People with Down syndrome are a heterogeneous group in terms of intellectual disability. The criminal responsibility and legal capacity of individuals may vary according to the legal situation. When requesting forensic psychiatric evaluation of these patients with psychiatric co-morbidity, patients should not be prejudged in terms of their level of mental competence and each case should be assessed individually.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":43468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jidob-11-2023-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Down syndrome is one of the common genetic causes of intellectual disability. Adult with Down syndrome may have many psychiatric comorbidities. Therefore, their mental health status should be considered in legal proceedings such as criminal responsibility and legal capacity where they are involved. This study aims to highlight that individuals with Down syndrome are often referred directly to forensic psychiatry without undergoing an interview, despite the fact that this is a group with varied mental statuses.

Design/methodology/approach

This study analysed the socio-demographic, clinical and forensic characteristics of eight adult individuals with Down syndrome for whom the Council of Forensic Medicine (CFM) requested an opinion on criminal liability and other legal situations between 2018 and 2022. The CFM is an authoritative institution to which cases from all areas of Türkiye are referred.

Findings

The mean age of the individuals with Down syndrome for whom a forensic psychiatric opinion was requested was 24.63 (±7.95) and the mean IQ level was 54.13 (±13.38). All cases were male, 6 / 8 were referred for assessment of criminal responsibility and 4 / 6 of those referred for assessment of criminal responsibility were referred for sexual offences. It was found that 5 / 8 of the cases had moderate intellectual disability and 3 / 8 of the cases had mild intellectual disability.

Research limitations/implications

Regarding the limitations of this study, the first one is the small sample size. Nevertheless, due to the low prevalence of people with Down syndrome in society, it is plausible that their stigmatization may not be reflected in the judicial system, even in cases involving violent behaviour. The second limitation is that the reports lack all psychiatric medical documents, including forensic psychiatric evaluations of individuals with Down syndrome. Additionally, additional diseases were recorded based on familial anamnesis. The third limitation is that this study is the first publication to investigate Down syndrome from a forensic psychiatric perspective. Thus, there is a lack of literature to make direct comparisons and references in the discussion section.

Social implications

This is the first study about forensic psychiatric aspects for people with Down syndrome. The aim of this study was to examine the forensic psychiatric approach in Down syndrome, one of the most common genetic causes of intellectual disability, the situations in which forensic psychiatric assessment is required and the issues that might be considered important in this regard. Although there are various publications in the literature on the psychiatric conditions of individuals with Down syndrome, to our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate individuals with Down syndrome in terms of forensic psychiatric evaluation. People with Down syndrome are known to have varying degrees of intellectual disability and different types of psychiatric comorbidity.

Originality/value

People with Down syndrome are a heterogeneous group in terms of intellectual disability. The criminal responsibility and legal capacity of individuals may vary according to the legal situation. When requesting forensic psychiatric evaluation of these patients with psychiatric co-morbidity, patients should not be prejudged in terms of their level of mental competence and each case should be assessed individually.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对唐氏综合征患者进行法医精神病学评估的重要意义是什么?来自土耳其的样本
目的 唐氏综合征是导致智力障碍的常见遗传原因之一。患有唐氏综合症的成年人可能合并多种精神疾病。因此,在涉及他们的刑事责任和法律行为能力等法律程序中,应考虑他们的精神健康状况。本研究旨在强调,尽管唐氏综合征患者是一个精神状况各异的群体,但他们往往未经面谈就被直接转诊至法医精神病学。本研究分析了2018年至2022年期间法医委员会(CFM)要求就刑事责任和其他法律情况提供意见的8名成年唐氏综合征患者的社会人口学、临床和法医特征。法医委员会是一家权威机构,土耳其所有地区的案件都会提交给该机构。研究结果被要求提供法医精神病学意见的唐氏综合征患者的平均年龄为 24.63(±7.95)岁,平均智商水平为 54.13(±13.38)。所有病例均为男性,6/8 的病例被转介进行刑事责任评估,4/6 的病例因性犯罪被转介进行刑事责任评估。研究的局限性/意义关于本研究的局限性,首先是样本量较小。尽管如此,由于唐氏综合症患者在社会中的发病率较低,即使在涉及暴力行为的案件中,司法系统也有可能没有反映出他们的耻辱感。第二个局限性是报告中缺少所有精神科医疗文件,包括对唐氏综合症患者的法医精神评估。此外,还根据家族病史记录了其他疾病。第三个局限是,本研究是从法医精神病学角度调查唐氏综合征的第一份出版物。社会影响这是第一项关于唐氏综合症患者法医精神病学方面的研究。本研究的目的是探讨唐氏综合症(智障最常见的遗传原因之一)的法医精神病学方法、需要进行法医精神病学评估的情况以及在这方面可能被视为重要的问题。虽然文献中有各种关于唐氏综合症患者精神状况的出版物,但据我们所知,这是第一项从法医精神病学评估的角度对唐氏综合症患者进行评估的研究。众所周知,唐氏综合征患者有不同程度的智力障碍和不同类型的精神病合并症。他们的刑事责任能力和法律行为能力会因法律情况的不同而有所差异。在要求对这些合并有精神疾病的患者进行法医精神病学评估时,不应预先判断患者的精神能力水平,而应对每个案例进行单独评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Trauma and adversity in forensic patients with an intellectual disability: a review of risk assessment reports What is important in forensic psychiatric evaluation in people with Down syndrome? A sample from Türkiye Demographic, forensic and service involvement characteristics related to adults referred to a community-based learning disability forensic team pre- and post-COVID-19 The relationship between institutional climate and constructive deviance A feasibility study to identify the presence of autism specific risk factors in secure services using an autism specific framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1