Precise relative magnitude measurement improves fracture characterization during hydraulic fracturing

IF 2.8 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Geophysical Journal International Pub Date : 2024-06-23 DOI:10.1093/gji/ggae204
Raymond Ng, Xiaowei Chen, Nori Nakata, Jacob I Walter
{"title":"Precise relative magnitude measurement improves fracture characterization during hydraulic fracturing","authors":"Raymond Ng, Xiaowei Chen, Nori Nakata, Jacob I Walter","doi":"10.1093/gji/ggae204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY Microseismic monitoring is an important technique to obtain detailed knowledge of in-situ fracture size and orientation during stimulation to maximize fluid flow throughout the rock volume and optimize production. Furthermore, considering that the frequency of earthquake magnitudes empirically follows a power law (i.e. Gutenberg–Richter), the accuracy of microseismic event magnitude distributions is potentially crucial for seismic risk management. In this study, we analyse microseismicity observed during four hydraulic fracture treatments of the legacy Cotton Valley experiment in 1997 at the Carthage gas field of East Texas, where fractures were activated at the base of the sand-shale Upper Cotton Valley formation. We perform waveform cross-correlation to detect similar event clusters, measure relative amplitude from aligned waveform pairs with a principal component analysis, then measure precise relative magnitudes. The new magnitudes significantly reduce the deviations between magnitude differences and relative amplitudes of event pairs. This subsequently reduces the magnitude differences between clusters located at different depths. Reduction in magnitude differences between clusters suggests that some attenuation-related biases could be effectively mitigated with relative magnitude measurements. The maximum likelihood method is applied to understand the magnitude frequency distributions and quantify the seismogenic index of the clusters. Statistical analyses with new magnitudes suggest that fractures that are more favourably oriented for shear failure have lower b-value and higher seismogenic index, suggesting higher potential for relatively larger earthquakes, rather than fractures subparallel to maximum horizontal principal stress orientation.","PeriodicalId":12519,"journal":{"name":"Geophysical Journal International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysical Journal International","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae204","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

SUMMARY Microseismic monitoring is an important technique to obtain detailed knowledge of in-situ fracture size and orientation during stimulation to maximize fluid flow throughout the rock volume and optimize production. Furthermore, considering that the frequency of earthquake magnitudes empirically follows a power law (i.e. Gutenberg–Richter), the accuracy of microseismic event magnitude distributions is potentially crucial for seismic risk management. In this study, we analyse microseismicity observed during four hydraulic fracture treatments of the legacy Cotton Valley experiment in 1997 at the Carthage gas field of East Texas, where fractures were activated at the base of the sand-shale Upper Cotton Valley formation. We perform waveform cross-correlation to detect similar event clusters, measure relative amplitude from aligned waveform pairs with a principal component analysis, then measure precise relative magnitudes. The new magnitudes significantly reduce the deviations between magnitude differences and relative amplitudes of event pairs. This subsequently reduces the magnitude differences between clusters located at different depths. Reduction in magnitude differences between clusters suggests that some attenuation-related biases could be effectively mitigated with relative magnitude measurements. The maximum likelihood method is applied to understand the magnitude frequency distributions and quantify the seismogenic index of the clusters. Statistical analyses with new magnitudes suggest that fractures that are more favourably oriented for shear failure have lower b-value and higher seismogenic index, suggesting higher potential for relatively larger earthquakes, rather than fractures subparallel to maximum horizontal principal stress orientation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精确测量相对幅度可改进水力压裂过程中的裂缝特征描述
摘要 微震监测是一项重要的技术,可用于在激发过程中详细了解原位裂缝的大小和走向,从而最大限度地提高流体在整个岩体中的流动性并优化生产。此外,考虑到地震震级频率根据经验遵循幂律(即古登堡-里克特),微震事件震级分布的准确性对于地震风险管理至关重要。在本研究中,我们分析了 1997 年在德克萨斯州东部迦太基气田进行的传统棉花谷实验的四次水力压裂处理过程中观察到的微震。我们通过波形交叉相关来检测类似的事件集群,利用主成分分析从对齐的波形对中测量相对振幅,然后测量精确的相对振幅。新的振幅大大减少了事件对的振幅差和相对振幅之间的偏差。随后,位于不同深度的事件群之间的振幅差异也随之减小。群集之间振幅差异的减少表明,一些与衰减相关的偏差可以通过相对振幅测量得到有效缓解。应用最大似然法了解震级频率分布并量化震群的成震指数。利用新震级进行的统计分析表明,更有利于剪切破坏的断裂具有更低的 b 值和更高的成震指数,这表明发生相对较大地震的可能性比与最大水平主应力方向不平行的断裂更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geophysical Journal International
Geophysical Journal International 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
10.70%
发文量
436
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Geophysical Journal International publishes top quality research papers, express letters, invited review papers and book reviews on all aspects of theoretical, computational, applied and observational geophysics.
期刊最新文献
Leveraging the ETAS model to forecast mining microseismicity Scaling of the geomagnetic secular variation time scale Enhancing computational efficiency in 3-D seismic modelling with half-precision floating-point numbers based on the curvilinear grid finite-difference method Improving signal-to-noise ratios of ambient noise cross-correlation functions using local attributes Azimuth correction for passive surface wave dispersion based on polarization analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1