Disparities in seeking care for olfactory and gustatory dysfunction: A population analysis

IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology Pub Date : 2024-06-21 DOI:10.1002/alr.23390
Daniel Gorelik MD, MPH, Aatin K. Dhanda MD, Najm S. Khan MBS, Masayoshi Takashima MD, FACS, Tariq Nisar MPH, Ella Brissett BS, Murugappan Ramanathan Jr. MD, Jayant M. Pinto MD, Nicholas R. Rowan MD, Omar G. Ahmed MD
{"title":"Disparities in seeking care for olfactory and gustatory dysfunction: A population analysis","authors":"Daniel Gorelik MD, MPH,&nbsp;Aatin K. Dhanda MD,&nbsp;Najm S. Khan MBS,&nbsp;Masayoshi Takashima MD, FACS,&nbsp;Tariq Nisar MPH,&nbsp;Ella Brissett BS,&nbsp;Murugappan Ramanathan Jr. MD,&nbsp;Jayant M. Pinto MD,&nbsp;Nicholas R. Rowan MD,&nbsp;Omar G. Ahmed MD","doi":"10.1002/alr.23390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Despite effects on quality of life from olfactory and gustatory dysfunction (OD and GD), screening practices are limited, and patients’ self-reporting of symptoms remains the only way to understand the burden of chemosensory dysfunction (CSD). Using a large population-based database, we sought to understand factors leading to reduced likelihood of discussing CSD with a provider.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The 2013‒2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) chemosensory protocol was queried for factors influencing discussion of OD/GD with a healthcare provider. Sociodemographic, comorbidity, and objective OD/GD testing results were assessed with a multivariate analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Out of 146.1 million US adults, there were an estimated 41.4 million individuals with self-reported OD/GD in the prior 12 months (28.3%). A total of 86.8% of participants did not discuss their problem with a healthcare provider. Men were about half as likely to speak with a healthcare provider (odds ratio [OR] 0.42; 0.26–0.66; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and those with a college education were about nine times more likely to discuss the problem compared to those with less than a ninth-grade educational achievement (OR 8.83; 1.86–41.98; <i>p</i> = 0.02). Those with objective confirmation of CSD were still unlikely to speak with a provider (OR 0.77; 0.44–1.33; <i>p</i> = 0.36).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Men and those with less education are less likely to discuss OD/GD with a healthcare provider. These populations tend to be at increased risk for CSD, and there are severe downstream health and quality of life implications related to CSD. Dedicated screening and increased public awareness are critical to ensure more equitable care.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13716,"journal":{"name":"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alr.23390","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Despite effects on quality of life from olfactory and gustatory dysfunction (OD and GD), screening practices are limited, and patients’ self-reporting of symptoms remains the only way to understand the burden of chemosensory dysfunction (CSD). Using a large population-based database, we sought to understand factors leading to reduced likelihood of discussing CSD with a provider.

Methods

The 2013‒2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) chemosensory protocol was queried for factors influencing discussion of OD/GD with a healthcare provider. Sociodemographic, comorbidity, and objective OD/GD testing results were assessed with a multivariate analysis.

Results

Out of 146.1 million US adults, there were an estimated 41.4 million individuals with self-reported OD/GD in the prior 12 months (28.3%). A total of 86.8% of participants did not discuss their problem with a healthcare provider. Men were about half as likely to speak with a healthcare provider (odds ratio [OR] 0.42; 0.26–0.66; p < 0.001) and those with a college education were about nine times more likely to discuss the problem compared to those with less than a ninth-grade educational achievement (OR 8.83; 1.86–41.98; p = 0.02). Those with objective confirmation of CSD were still unlikely to speak with a provider (OR 0.77; 0.44–1.33; p = 0.36).

Conclusion

Men and those with less education are less likely to discuss OD/GD with a healthcare provider. These populations tend to be at increased risk for CSD, and there are severe downstream health and quality of life implications related to CSD. Dedicated screening and increased public awareness are critical to ensure more equitable care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
因嗅觉和味觉功能障碍而就医的差异:人口分析
导言尽管嗅觉和味觉功能障碍(OD 和 GD)会影响生活质量,但筛查方法却很有限,患者对症状的自我报告仍然是了解化学感觉功能障碍(CSD)负担的唯一途径。我们利用基于人口的大型数据库,试图了解导致与医疗服务提供者讨论 CSD 的可能性降低的因素。方法我们对 2013-2014 年美国国家健康与营养调查(NHANES)化感协议进行了查询,以了解影响与医疗服务提供者讨论 OD/GD 的因素。结果在 1.461 亿美国成年人中,估计有 4140 万人(28.3%)在过去 12 个月中自述患有 OD/GD。86.8%的参与者没有与医疗保健提供者讨论过自己的问题。男性与医疗保健提供者交谈的几率约为后者的一半(几率比 [OR] 0.42; 0.26-0.66; p <0.001),与教育程度低于九年级的人相比,受过大学教育的人与医疗保健提供者讨论问题的几率约为后者的九倍(OR 8.83; 1.86-41.98; p = 0.02)。结论男性和教育程度较低的人群不太可能与医疗服务提供者讨论 OD/GD 问题。这些人群罹患 CSD 的风险往往会增加,而且 CSD 会严重影响下游健康和生活质量。专门的筛查和提高公众意识对于确保更公平的护理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
10.90%
发文量
185
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Forum of Allergy & Rhinologyis a peer-reviewed scientific journal, and the Official Journal of the American Rhinologic Society and the American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy. International Forum of Allergy Rhinology provides a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and others to publish original research and explore controversies in the medical and surgical treatment of patients with otolaryngic allergy, rhinologic, and skull base conditions. The application of current research to the management of otolaryngic allergy, rhinologic, and skull base diseases and the need for further investigation will be highlighted.
期刊最新文献
Guidance for the evaluation by payors of claims submitted using Current Procedural Terminology codes 95165, 95115, and 95117. Making "scents" of nutrients: Investigating the relationship between olfactory dysfunction and vitamin intake. Surgery versus biologics for nasal polyposis: Perspective on contemporary data. Issue Information Ambient particulate matter and frequency of outpatient visits for chronic rhinosinusitis in the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1