International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology最新文献

Background/aim: Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is a multisystemic disease associated with nasal polyposis. Multiple biologics are used for managing EGPA, including some approved for nasal polyps (NP). This study investigated real-world biologic prescription patterns for EGPA and their impact on NP and endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) use.

Methods: EGPA patients with NP treated with a biologic at any Mayo Clinic site (January 2010 to January 2024) were identified by querying the unified electronic medical record. Patterns of biologic therapy, clinical course, impact on NP, and performance of ESS were studied.

Results: Eighty patients were identified. Overall, 71 of 80 (88.75%) patients underwent ESS, with 62 of 80 (77.5%) undergoing 131 ESS procedures prior to biologic therapy. ESS for recalcitrant NP (47 episodes) was performed on 38 of 80 (47.5%) patients on biologics. Biologic monotherapy was used in 90% (72) of patients; mepolizumab (81.9%) was the most common, followed by rituximab (23.6%), benralizumab (18.1%), and dupilumab (12.5%). Switching of biologics was observed in 28 of 80 patients. Concurrent dual-biologic therapy was used in eight (10%) patients. For patients on single-agent biologic therapy, ESS was performed on 52.5% of patients on mepolizumab, 23.5% on rituximab, 42.8% on benralizumab, and 22.2% on dupilumab.

Conclusions: Multidisciplinary multi-modality treatment with biologics and ESS appeared to be the mainstay of controlling NP in EGPA. Mepolizumab was the most frequently used biologic. Dual biologic therapy was necessary in 10% of patients. Overall, 71 of 80 (88.75%) patients had ESS, with almost half the study population (47.5%) undergoing ESS after initiating biologic treatment.

Background: Recent studies have extensively explored new non-invasive and side-effect-free therapeutic strategies for the treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR). Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) utilizes photons from the red to infrared spectrum to modulate biological processes, exhibiting anti-inflammatory and regenerative properties. The objective of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of PBMT in patients with AR.

Methods: This study was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial involving 62 patients with AR. Participants underwent PBMT twice weekly, totaling eight sessions over the course of 1 month. The control group consisted of 29 patients who received treatment with a non-light-emitting device, while 33 patients in the laser therapy group received a protocol of 6 J of red and infrared light administered intranasally, along with 1 J of infrared light applied externally to the nose. Objective, psychophysical, and subjective assessments of nasal obstruction and olfactory function were conducted both before and after the treatment.

Results: PBMT contributed to significant improvements in various nasal and respiratory parameters. The peak nasal inspiratory flow demonstrated significant improvement (p < 0.001), and the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation scale indicated notable enhancement in nasal obstruction (p = 0.048). Additionally, the Rhinitis Control Assessment Test reflected significant symptom improvement over the past week (p = 0.035). However, the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test showed no significant change in olfactory function (p = 0.251).

Conclusion: Our data suggest that PBMT may serve as a promising therapeutic option for individuals with AR, providing an alternative for those who are unable to tolerate conventional medications. Furthermore, it demonstrates efficacy and safety as a viable treatment alternative.

Background: Type 2 inflammation dominates eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (eCRS) and adult onset asthma. IL-4, -5, and -13 are prominent disease mediators. Disease control can be achieved with biologic therapies. However, despite some patients entering remission, others experience poor control.

Aim: We aimed to describe eCRS patients treated with anti-IL-5R antibody (benralizumab) and assess characteristics between responders and those requiring class switching to anti-IL-4/13R (dupilumab).

Method: A retrospective cohort study was performed on consecutive adult patients with eCRS and asthma who had commenced benralizumab.  Disease control was defined as controlled or poorly controlled (EPOS2020 partly control/uncontrolled). Poorly controlled patients were switched to dupilumab.  Baseline and post-IL-5R characteristics including age, sex, 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) score, and serum/tissue eosinophilia were assessed. Disease control post-class switching was reassessed. Factors predicting poorly controlled disease on anti-IL-5R therapy were sought.

Results: Fifty patients were assessed (51.44 ± 12.73 years, 56% female). Poorly controlled disease on anti-IL-5R requiring class switch to dupilumab was seen in 42%. Poorly controlled patients were younger (46.14 ± 10.76 vs. 55.28 ± 12.83 years, p = 0.01) with higher baseline SNOT-22 (61.42 ± 19.19 vs. 42.32 ± 21.55, p < 0.01). Baseline ACQ scores and eosinophil count (0.78 ± 0.49 vs. 0.62 ± 0.34 × 10⁹cells/L, p = 0.23) and were similar between groups. In the poorly controlled patients on anti-IL-5R therapy, eosinophilia had reduced in both serum (0.78 ± 0.5 vs. 0.02 ± 0.1 × 10⁹cells/L, p < 0.01) and tissue (>100 cells/HPF: 100% vs. 29%, p = 0.01). Class switching resulted in disease control for 65%.

Conclusion: Neither eosinophilia nor its reduction predicted a non-responder group to anti-IL-5R therapy. While the eosinophil population may be a good marker for the CRS phenotype seen in nasal polyps, it is unlikely to be the cell population driving the disease process.

Rationale: Smoking has been shown to be associated with circulating deficiencies in 25(OH)D3 and reduced sinonasal tissue levels of the active form of vitamin D, 1,25(OH)2D3. Given vitamin D's ability to reduce inflammation, we sought to examine if intranasal (IN) delivery of calcitriol [clinical analog of 1,25(OH)2D3] could reduce inflammation and improve disease severity in a murine model of chronic cigarette smoke-induced sinonasal inflammation (CS-SI).

Methods: Mice were exposed to CS 5 h/day, 5 days/week for 9 months, and then began IN calcitriol three times per week for 4 weeks. Micro-CT was used to assess disease severity. Sinonasal tissues were collected for RNA-seq analysis. Olfactory function was assessed using a T-maze odorant avoidance sniff behavior test. Nasal lavage fluid (NALF) was used for cytology and cytokines analysis.

Results: Quantification of disease severity by micro-CT showed IN calcitriol reduced opacification by 18%, as compared to smoke cessation alone, in which only a 5% reduction was noted. H&E analysis of NAFL demonstrated heightened neutrophil infiltration and neutrophil-associated chemokines in CS-SI mice, which was reduced with IN calcitriol treatment. RNA-seq pathway analysis demonstrated that smoking was associated with odorant binding changes and that calcitriol treatment reduced neutrophil migration and inflammation. Lastly, IN calcitriol reversed olfactory loss caused in CS-SI.

Conclusions: IN delivery of calcitriol accelerates inflammatory resolution in the nose and olfactory mucosa after prolonged CS exposure. Furthermore, treatment was associated with improved olfactory function in mice CS-SI, as such local delivery of calcitriol may serve as a novel treatment for modulating sinonasal inflammation.

Background: Olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) is a rare sinonasal malignancy primarily treated with surgery. For tumors arising from the olfactory area, traditional treatment involves transcribriform resection of the anterior cranial fossa. Surgery can be performed with unilateral or bilateral resection depending on extent of involvement; however, there are currently no studies comparing outcomes between the two.

Methods: Prospective and retrospective data on primary ONB patients were collected from a multicenter registry involving eight academic sites. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to create patient cohorts with similar baseline characteristics. Cox proportional hazards and Kaplan Meier analyses assessed overall survival (OS). Logistic regression assessed associations between extent of resection (unilateral versus bilateral) and tumor recurrence or postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak.

Results: A total of 187 ONB patients (47.6% female) with an average age of 53.6 ± 15.1 years were analyzed. Most tumors were unilateral (81.3%) and predominantly Kadish C (58.3%) or Hyams II (55.8%). Overall, 56.7% of patients underwent bilateral resection. Fifty-four patients experienced tumor recurrence and nine had postoperative CSF leaks. Following PSM (n = 45/group), extent of resection was not associated with mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.73; p = 0.407) or OS (p = 0.400). There was no association between extent of resection and recurrence (odds ratio [OR] 0.90; p = 0.814) or postoperative CSF leak (OR 1.54; p = 0.647).

Conclusions: For ONB tumors where unilateral resection may be feasible and oncologically sound, the decision for unilateral versus bilateral resection showed no significant effect on survival, recurrence, or postoperative CSF leak. Oncologic outcomes may be comparable when resection is tailored to individual patient and tumor characteristics.

In patients with severe olfactory and gustatory dysfunction, olfactory cleft opacification improves with expanded intranasal steroid treatment (EDS-FLU) relative to placebo. This is directly associated with objective and patient-reported taste/smell improvement.