A Modified Delphi Research Study on Fundamental Movement Skill Complexity for Teaching and Learning Physical Literacy

IF 1.8 2区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Teaching in Physical Education Pub Date : 2023-12-14 DOI:10.1123/jtpe.2023-0038
Homa Rafiei Milajerdi, Anna Thacker, Mahboubeh Ghayour Najafabadi, Christoph Clephas, Larry Katz
{"title":"A Modified Delphi Research Study on Fundamental Movement Skill Complexity for Teaching and Learning Physical Literacy","authors":"Homa Rafiei Milajerdi, Anna Thacker, Mahboubeh Ghayour Najafabadi, Christoph Clephas, Larry Katz","doi":"10.1123/jtpe.2023-0038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><em><strong>Purpose</strong>:</em> To establish a consensus on the complexity of 16 fundamental movement skills (FMS). Initially, complexity was defined as how difficult it would be to teach FMS to children and for the children to learn them. <em><strong>Method</strong>:</em> The study was conducted using a modified Delphi method and a mobile application called Move Improve® to showcase video demonstrations of 16 FMS. Six experts discussed and rated the complexity of each FMS using a 5-point Likert scale until a 75% consensus was obtained during three rounds. <em><strong>Result</strong>:</em> Dribble was rated as the most complex (average five) and run as the least (average one). The highest percentage of consensus at 100% was obtained for dribble, overhead throw, run, and skip during Round 3. <em><strong>Conclusion</strong>:</em> Eye–hand or eye–foot coordination, laterality, and the environment were deemed as the most influential factors when rating the complexity of FMS.</p>","PeriodicalId":50025,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Teaching in Physical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Teaching in Physical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2023-0038","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To establish a consensus on the complexity of 16 fundamental movement skills (FMS). Initially, complexity was defined as how difficult it would be to teach FMS to children and for the children to learn them. Method: The study was conducted using a modified Delphi method and a mobile application called Move Improve® to showcase video demonstrations of 16 FMS. Six experts discussed and rated the complexity of each FMS using a 5-point Likert scale until a 75% consensus was obtained during three rounds. Result: Dribble was rated as the most complex (average five) and run as the least (average one). The highest percentage of consensus at 100% was obtained for dribble, overhead throw, run, and skip during Round 3. Conclusion: Eye–hand or eye–foot coordination, laterality, and the environment were deemed as the most influential factors when rating the complexity of FMS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于体育素养教与学的基本动作技能复杂性的改良德尔菲研究
目的:就 16 项基本动作技能(FMS)的复杂程度达成共识。最初,复杂程度被定义为向儿童教授基本动作技能以及儿童学习这些技能的难度。研究方法:本研究采用改良的德尔菲法和名为 Move Improve® 的移动应用程序来展示 16 种基本运动技能的视频演示。六位专家使用 5 点李克特量表对每种 FMS 的复杂程度进行讨论和评分,直到三轮讨论达成 75% 的共识。结果:运球被评为最复杂(平均 5 分),跑步被评为最不复杂(平均 1 分)。在第三轮中,运球、高空抛球、跑和跳获得的共识百分比最高,为 100%。结论眼-手或眼-脚协调、侧向和环境被认为是评定 FMS 复杂性时最具影响力的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Teaching in Physical Education
Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 社会科学-运动科学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
21.40%
发文量
69
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Teaching in Physical Education (JTPE) features peer-reviewed research articles based on classroom and laboratory studies, descriptive and survey studies, summary and review articles, and discussion of current topics of interest to physical educators at every level. JTPE is endorsed by the Curriculum and Instruction Academy of the National Association for Sport and Physical Education and the International Association for Physical Education in Higher Education.
期刊最新文献
Erratum. A Qualitative Examination of Online Practices During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Observational Preferences Within Physical Education Scholarly Book Reviews in the Journal of Teaching in Physical Education Before-School Physical Activity Program on Middle School Students’ Social and Emotional Learning and Energy Levels A Self-Study of a Teaching Personal and Social Responsibility Program Coordinator Successful Practices of Novice Urban Physical Education Teachers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1