Theology Gone Pink: A Consideration of Greta Gerwig’s Barbie

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION Religion and the Arts Pub Date : 2024-06-27 DOI:10.1163/15685292-02803005
Charity Gibson
{"title":"Theology Gone Pink: A Consideration of Greta Gerwig’s Barbie","authors":"Charity Gibson","doi":"10.1163/15685292-02803005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Gerwig’s <em>Barbie</em> film addresses social concerns regarding sexism and responds to interpretations of Genesis and the roles of men and women. The film argues that women should not rely on or find fulfilment with a man. However, while Ken and Barbie each forge their own paths at the film’s end, the real world continues to suffer from underground patriarchy and Barbie Land resumes functioning like a matriarchy. Gerwig draws attention to the social reform needed for true gender equality to exist, yet the film’s ending shows a distancing from the problem rather than a leaning into it. The Genesis account is often rejected because it is incorrectly interpreted as a patriarchal structure of man’s dominion over women; however, when viewed as an example of an egalitarian relationship, it offers positive visions for society. This requires resisting a narrative of hyper-individualism to right social wrongs and instead adopting a posture of egalitarian goodwill that bolsters the common good.</p>","PeriodicalId":41383,"journal":{"name":"Religion and the Arts","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religion and the Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15685292-02803005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gerwig’s Barbie film addresses social concerns regarding sexism and responds to interpretations of Genesis and the roles of men and women. The film argues that women should not rely on or find fulfilment with a man. However, while Ken and Barbie each forge their own paths at the film’s end, the real world continues to suffer from underground patriarchy and Barbie Land resumes functioning like a matriarchy. Gerwig draws attention to the social reform needed for true gender equality to exist, yet the film’s ending shows a distancing from the problem rather than a leaning into it. The Genesis account is often rejected because it is incorrectly interpreted as a patriarchal structure of man’s dominion over women; however, when viewed as an example of an egalitarian relationship, it offers positive visions for society. This requires resisting a narrative of hyper-individualism to right social wrongs and instead adopting a posture of egalitarian goodwill that bolsters the common good.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
粉色神学格蕾塔-葛韦格的《芭比娃娃》之思考
葛韦格的电影《芭比娃娃》探讨了社会对性别歧视的关注,并回应了对《创世纪》和男女角色的诠释。影片认为,女性不应依赖男性,也不应在男性身上找到满足感。然而,在影片结尾,肯和芭比各自开辟了自己的道路,现实世界却继续遭受着地下父权制的折磨,芭比乐园恢复了母权制的运作。葛韦格提请人们注意,要实现真正的性别平等,就必须进行社会改革,然而影片的结尾却显示出对问题的疏远,而不是向问题靠拢。创世纪》中的记载常常被摒弃,因为它被错误地解释为男性统治女性的父权结构;然而,如果将其视为平等关系的范例,它就会为社会提供积极的愿景。这就要求我们抵制以极端个人主义来纠正社会错误的叙事方式,转而采取平等主义的善意姿态来促进共同利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
Sacred Sorrow, Sacred Joy: The Psalmic Aesthetic in Edwidge Danticat Theology Gone Pink: A Consideration of Greta Gerwig’s Barbie A Survey of American Synagogue Stained Glass: 1845 to the Present God Is Time; The Devil Rules over Space: Theological Reflections on Val Del Omar’s Recrudescence of Berruguete in Fire in Castile Dionysus and His Discontents: Variations on a Motif in Joseph Conrad, Henry James, and Thomas Mann
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1