Dissecting the association between gut microbiota, body mass index and specific depressive symptoms: a mediation Mendelian randomisation study

IF 6.8 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY General Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1136/gpsych-2023-101412
Tong Yu, Chengfeng Chen, Yuqing Yang, Mingqia Wang, Yantianyu Yang, Wanting Feng, Shiqi Yuan, Xiancang Ma, Jie Li, Bin Zhang
{"title":"Dissecting the association between gut microbiota, body mass index and specific depressive symptoms: a mediation Mendelian randomisation study","authors":"Tong Yu, Chengfeng Chen, Yuqing Yang, Mingqia Wang, Yantianyu Yang, Wanting Feng, Shiqi Yuan, Xiancang Ma, Jie Li, Bin Zhang","doi":"10.1136/gpsych-2023-101412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Observational studies highlight the association between gut microbiota (GM) composition and depression; however, evidence for the causal relationship between GM and specific depressive symptoms remains lacking. Aims We aimed to evaluate the causal relationship between GM and specific depressive symptoms as well as the mediating role of body mass index (BMI). Methods We performed a two-sample Mendelian randomisation (MR) analysis using genetic variants associated with GM and specific depressive symptoms from genome-wide association studies. The mediating role of BMI was subsequently explored using mediation analysis via two-step MR. Results MR evidence suggested the Bifidobacterium genus (β=–0.03; 95% CI –0.05 to –0.02; p<0.001 and β=–0.03; 95% CI –0.05 to –0.02; p<0.001) and Actinobacteria phylum (β=–0.04; 95% CI –0.06 to –0.02; p<0.001 and β=–0.03; 95% CI –0.05 to –0.03; p=0.001) had protective effects on both anhedonia and depressed mood. The Actinobacteria phylum also had protective effects on appetite changes (β=–0.04; 95% CI –0.06 to –0.01; p=0.005), while the Family XI had an antiprotective effect (β=0.03; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.04; p<0.001). The Bifidobacteriaceae family (β=–0.01; 95% CI –0.02 to –0.01; p=0.001) and Actinobacteria phylum (β=–0.02; 95% CI –0.03 to –0.01; p=0.001) showed protective effects against suicidality. The two-step MR analysis revealed that BMI also acted as a mediating moderator between the Actinobacteria phylum and appetite changes (mediated proportion, 34.42%) and that BMI partially mediated the effect of the Bifidobacterium genus (14.14% and 8.05%) and Actinobacteria phylum (13.10% and 8.31%) on both anhedonia and depressed mood. Conclusions These findings suggest a potential therapeutic effect of Actinobacteria and Bifidobacterium on both depression and obesity. Further studies are required to translate these findings into clinical practice. Data are available in a public, open access repository. All GWAS summary statistics are publicly available for download. The GWASs data for gut microbiota were provided by MiBioGen consortium (<https://mibiogen.gcc.rug.nl/>). The GWASs data for specific depressive symptoms were sourced from UK Biobank (<http://www.nealelab.is/uk-biobank>). The GWASs for BMI were provided by GIANT consortium ([https://portals.broadinstitute.org/collaboration/giant/index.php/GIANT\\_consortium\\_data_files][1]). [1]: https://portals.broadinstitute.org/collaboration/giant/index.php/GIANT_consortium_data_files","PeriodicalId":12549,"journal":{"name":"General Psychiatry","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/gpsych-2023-101412","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Observational studies highlight the association between gut microbiota (GM) composition and depression; however, evidence for the causal relationship between GM and specific depressive symptoms remains lacking. Aims We aimed to evaluate the causal relationship between GM and specific depressive symptoms as well as the mediating role of body mass index (BMI). Methods We performed a two-sample Mendelian randomisation (MR) analysis using genetic variants associated with GM and specific depressive symptoms from genome-wide association studies. The mediating role of BMI was subsequently explored using mediation analysis via two-step MR. Results MR evidence suggested the Bifidobacterium genus (β=–0.03; 95% CI –0.05 to –0.02; p<0.001 and β=–0.03; 95% CI –0.05 to –0.02; p<0.001) and Actinobacteria phylum (β=–0.04; 95% CI –0.06 to –0.02; p<0.001 and β=–0.03; 95% CI –0.05 to –0.03; p=0.001) had protective effects on both anhedonia and depressed mood. The Actinobacteria phylum also had protective effects on appetite changes (β=–0.04; 95% CI –0.06 to –0.01; p=0.005), while the Family XI had an antiprotective effect (β=0.03; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.04; p<0.001). The Bifidobacteriaceae family (β=–0.01; 95% CI –0.02 to –0.01; p=0.001) and Actinobacteria phylum (β=–0.02; 95% CI –0.03 to –0.01; p=0.001) showed protective effects against suicidality. The two-step MR analysis revealed that BMI also acted as a mediating moderator between the Actinobacteria phylum and appetite changes (mediated proportion, 34.42%) and that BMI partially mediated the effect of the Bifidobacterium genus (14.14% and 8.05%) and Actinobacteria phylum (13.10% and 8.31%) on both anhedonia and depressed mood. Conclusions These findings suggest a potential therapeutic effect of Actinobacteria and Bifidobacterium on both depression and obesity. Further studies are required to translate these findings into clinical practice. Data are available in a public, open access repository. All GWAS summary statistics are publicly available for download. The GWASs data for gut microbiota were provided by MiBioGen consortium (). The GWASs data for specific depressive symptoms were sourced from UK Biobank (). The GWASs for BMI were provided by GIANT consortium ([https://portals.broadinstitute.org/collaboration/giant/index.php/GIANT\_consortium\_data_files][1]). [1]: https://portals.broadinstitute.org/collaboration/giant/index.php/GIANT_consortium_data_files
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
剖析肠道微生物群、体重指数和特定抑郁症状之间的关联:调解孟德尔随机研究
背景 观察性研究强调了肠道微生物群(GM)组成与抑郁症之间的关系;然而,仍然缺乏证据证明肠道微生物群与特定抑郁症状之间的因果关系。目的 我们旨在评估肠道微生物群与特定抑郁症状之间的因果关系以及体重指数(BMI)的中介作用。方法 我们利用全基因组关联研究中与基因改造和特定抑郁症状相关的基因变异进行了双样本孟德尔随机化(MR)分析。随后,通过两步 MR 的中介分析探讨了 BMI 的中介作用。结果 MR 证据表明双歧杆菌属(β=-0.03;95% CI -0.05 至 -0.02;p)。特定抑郁症状的 GWASs 数据来自英国生物库(UK Biobank)。BMI 的 GWASs 由 GIANT 联合体提供([https://portals.broadinstitute.org/collaboration/giant/index.php/GIANT\_consortium\_data_files][1])。[1]: https://portals.broadinstitute.org/collaboration/giant/index.php/GIANT_consortium_data_files
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
General Psychiatry
General Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
21.90
自引率
2.50%
发文量
848
期刊介绍: General Psychiatry (GPSYCH), an open-access journal established in 1959, has been a pioneer in disseminating leading psychiatry research. Addressing a global audience of psychiatrists and mental health professionals, the journal covers diverse topics and publishes original research, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, forums on topical issues, case reports, research methods in psychiatry, and a distinctive section on 'Biostatistics in Psychiatry'. The scope includes original articles on basic research, clinical research, community-based studies, and ecological studies, encompassing a broad spectrum of psychiatric interests.
期刊最新文献
Global burden of mental disorders among adolescents and young adults, 1990-2021: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Diseases Study 2021. Brain morphological changes across behaviour spectrums in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Prevalence and characteristics of off-label use of antidepressants in paediatric patients in China. Efficacy and safety of GW117 tablets in major depressive disorder: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 dose-finding study. Moving beyond diagnostic labels in psychiatry: outcome-linked treatment modelling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1