Associations between dietary intake and multiple long term conditions in adults: A scoping review

IF 7.6 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Proceedings of the Nutrition Society Pub Date : 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1017/s0029665124004439
M. Brandner, L. Zhang, A. MacGregor, M. Traka, A. Welch
{"title":"Associations between dietary intake and multiple long term conditions in adults: A scoping review","authors":"M. Brandner, L. Zhang, A. MacGregor, M. Traka, A. Welch","doi":"10.1017/s0029665124004439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multiple-long term conditions (MLTCs), also known as multimorbidity, are commonly defined as the presence of two or more long-term medical conditions in one individual<jats:sup>(1)</jats:sup>. More than half of all adults over 60 years are affected by multimorbidity worldwide<jats:sup>(2)</jats:sup> and its increasing prevalence demands a shift in focus for research and healthcare towards multiple clusters of disease, rather than single conditions<jats:sup>(3)</jats:sup>.Current epidemiological evidence on diet as preventative lifestyle factor in relation to MLTCs is limited<jats:sup>(4)</jats:sup>. Therefore we reviewed the existing evidence to summarise methods of assessment of diet and multimorbidity measure to identify further research needs in a scoping review.Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science and Scopus were searched systematically following the methodological approach for scoping reviews by PRISMA. The protocol was published on Open Science Framework under DOI10.17605/OSF.IO/9FP5D. The search yielded a total of 10,937 results. After de-duplication, title and abstract screening and a final inclusion round of in-text screening by two reviewers, 53 articles met the inclusion criteria. Observational studies were included if they examined the relationship between any dietary factor and the prevalence/or development of MLTCs in community-dwelling adults.Publication dates of included research papers ranged from 2014 to 2023, with over half of studies published in the last three years. There was high variability between dietary assessment methods used: in the majority of studies (n=21, 39.6%) fruit and vegetable intake was the only diet-related variable reported. <jats:italic>A priori</jats:italic> diet quality scores were used in n=15 (28.3%) studies and n=6 (11.3%) studies used <jats:italic>a posteriori</jats:italic> approaches to identify dietary patterns, n=11 used other methods (20.8%). Only n=3 (5.7%) studies also focussed on micronutrients. MLTCs were generally defined as presence of ≥2 chronic conditions by most papers, however the number of qualifying conditions ranged from 2-60 conditions.Overall, 60.4% (n=32) of studies were cross-sectional with various dietary components and patterns showing either mixed results, (n=10, 31.3%), no association (n=5, 15.6%) or inverse associations (n=12, 37.5%), i.e. higher diet score/adherence/consumption of diet components was associated with lower MLTCs, to positive relationships e.g. individuals with MLTCs consumed higher intakes of fruit and vegetables (n=5, 15.6%). Varying results were also found in longitudinal studies (n= 21, 39.6%). Some studies found inverse associations (n=8, 38.1%) i.e. higher adherence/more healthy food consumption was associated with lower MLTCs. However, other studies showed either no significant association (n=4, 19%), mixed results (n=5, 23.8%) or positive associations (n=4, 19.1%).The evidence relating MLTCs to dietary intakes is relatively recent with most studies being reported within the last 3 years. Studies showed various outcomes and more detailed information is needed on the effect of dietary patterns and their compounds on the prevalence and development of multimorbidity. Following a standardized method of multimorbidity-quantification is highly important.","PeriodicalId":20751,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Nutrition Society","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Nutrition Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0029665124004439","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multiple-long term conditions (MLTCs), also known as multimorbidity, are commonly defined as the presence of two or more long-term medical conditions in one individual(1). More than half of all adults over 60 years are affected by multimorbidity worldwide(2) and its increasing prevalence demands a shift in focus for research and healthcare towards multiple clusters of disease, rather than single conditions(3).Current epidemiological evidence on diet as preventative lifestyle factor in relation to MLTCs is limited(4). Therefore we reviewed the existing evidence to summarise methods of assessment of diet and multimorbidity measure to identify further research needs in a scoping review.Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science and Scopus were searched systematically following the methodological approach for scoping reviews by PRISMA. The protocol was published on Open Science Framework under DOI10.17605/OSF.IO/9FP5D. The search yielded a total of 10,937 results. After de-duplication, title and abstract screening and a final inclusion round of in-text screening by two reviewers, 53 articles met the inclusion criteria. Observational studies were included if they examined the relationship between any dietary factor and the prevalence/or development of MLTCs in community-dwelling adults.Publication dates of included research papers ranged from 2014 to 2023, with over half of studies published in the last three years. There was high variability between dietary assessment methods used: in the majority of studies (n=21, 39.6%) fruit and vegetable intake was the only diet-related variable reported. A priori diet quality scores were used in n=15 (28.3%) studies and n=6 (11.3%) studies used a posteriori approaches to identify dietary patterns, n=11 used other methods (20.8%). Only n=3 (5.7%) studies also focussed on micronutrients. MLTCs were generally defined as presence of ≥2 chronic conditions by most papers, however the number of qualifying conditions ranged from 2-60 conditions.Overall, 60.4% (n=32) of studies were cross-sectional with various dietary components and patterns showing either mixed results, (n=10, 31.3%), no association (n=5, 15.6%) or inverse associations (n=12, 37.5%), i.e. higher diet score/adherence/consumption of diet components was associated with lower MLTCs, to positive relationships e.g. individuals with MLTCs consumed higher intakes of fruit and vegetables (n=5, 15.6%). Varying results were also found in longitudinal studies (n= 21, 39.6%). Some studies found inverse associations (n=8, 38.1%) i.e. higher adherence/more healthy food consumption was associated with lower MLTCs. However, other studies showed either no significant association (n=4, 19%), mixed results (n=5, 23.8%) or positive associations (n=4, 19.1%).The evidence relating MLTCs to dietary intakes is relatively recent with most studies being reported within the last 3 years. Studies showed various outcomes and more detailed information is needed on the effect of dietary patterns and their compounds on the prevalence and development of multimorbidity. Following a standardized method of multimorbidity-quantification is highly important.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人膳食摄入量与多种长期疾病之间的关系:范围审查
多重长期病症(MLTCs)又称多病症,通常是指一个人同时患有两种或两种以上的长期病症(1)。全世界 60 岁以上的成年人中有一半以上受到多病症的影响(2),其发病率不断上升,要求研究和医疗保健的重点转向多种疾病群,而不是单一疾病(3)。目前,有关饮食作为预防多病症的生活方式因素的流行病学证据非常有限(4)。因此,我们对现有证据进行了回顾,总结了饮食和多病症措施的评估方法,并在范围界定综述中确定了进一步的研究需求。我们按照 PRISMA 范围界定综述的方法,对 Medline、Embase、CINAHL、Web of Science 和 Scopus 进行了系统检索。该协议已在开放科学框架(Open Science Framework)上发布,网址为 DOI10.17605/OSF.IO/9FP5D。搜索结果共计 10,937 条。经过去重、标题和摘要筛选以及由两名审稿人进行的最后一轮内文筛选,共有 53 篇文章符合纳入标准。观察性研究如果研究了社区居住的成年人中任何饮食因素与多发性骨髓营养不良症的患病率/或发展之间的关系,均被纳入其中。所使用的膳食评估方法差异很大:在大多数研究中(21 项,39.6%),水果和蔬菜摄入量是唯一报告的膳食相关变量。有 15 项研究(28.3%)使用先验膳食质量评分,有 6 项研究(11.3%)使用后验法确定膳食模式,有 11 项研究使用其他方法(20.8%)。只有 3 项(5.7%)研究还关注了微量营养素。总体而言,60.4%(n=32)的研究为横断面研究,各种膳食成分和模式显示出混合结果(n=10,31.总体而言,60.4%(n=32)的研究为横断面研究,各种膳食成分和模式显示出混合结果(n=10,31.3%)、无关联(n=5,15.6%)或反向关联(n=12,37.5%),即较高的膳食评分/膳食依从性/膳食成分摄入量与较低的多发性骨髓营养不良相关,也有正向关系,如多发性骨髓营养不良患者摄入较多的水果和蔬菜(n=5,15.6%)。纵向研究也发现了不同的结果(21 项,39.6%)。一些研究发现了反向关联(8 项,占 38.1%),即较高的依从性/较多的健康食品摄入量与较低的多氯联苯摄入量相关。然而,其他研究则显示出无显著关联(4 项,19%)、混合结果(5 项,23.8%)或正相关(4 项,19.1%)。研究显示了各种结果,需要更详细的信息来说明膳食模式及其化合物对多病症发病率和发展的影响。采用标准化方法对多病症进行量化非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
190
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Proceedings of the Nutrition Society publishes papers and abstracts presented by members and invited speakers at the scientific meetings of The Nutrition Society. The journal provides an invaluable record of the scientific research currently being undertaken, contributing to ''the scientific study of nutrition and its application to the maintenance of human and animal health.'' The journal is of interest to academics, researchers and clinical practice workers in both human and animal nutrition and related fields.
期刊最新文献
Effects of Time-Restricted Eating on Body Composition, Biomarkers of Metabolism, Inflammation, Circadian System and Oxidative Stress in Overweight and Obesity: An Exploratory Review. Budgetary Tracking of Food and Nutrition Security Funding in selected Sahel and West Africa regions from 2017-2019. Chronotypical influence on eating behaviour and appetite control. The potential role of the Mediterranean Diet for the treatment and management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: a review of the pathophysiological mechanisms and clinical evidence. The relationship between dietary greenhouse gas emissions and demographic characteristics in high-income countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1