Diversity of plant-based food consumption: A systematic scoping review on measurement tools and associated health outcomes

IF 7.6 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Proceedings of the Nutrition Society Pub Date : 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1017/s0029665124004440
A.C Creedon, V. Hubbard, R. Gibson, E. Dimidi
{"title":"Diversity of plant-based food consumption: A systematic scoping review on measurement tools and associated health outcomes","authors":"A.C Creedon, V. Hubbard, R. Gibson, E. Dimidi","doi":"10.1017/s0029665124004440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Plant-based foods encompass all food products derived from plant sources, such as fruits, vegetables, grains, legumes, herbs and spices, and nuts and seeds, plant-based fats and oils (e.g. olive oil) and plant-based beverages (e.g. tea and coffee). Consumption of diverse plant-based foods is a dietary pattern that has gained significant attention amongst the public, due to its perceived benefits for maintenance of health<jats:sup>(1)</jats:sup>. Plant-based foods provide a rich source of macronutrients, micronutrients and non-nutrient bio-actives that are often reported to improve health outcomes. Despite this, there are no standard definitions of plant-based diversity, or consensus on methods of measurement in nutrition research studies. The objective of the current research was to conduct a scoping review of the literature to identify studies investigating plant-based food diversity and it’s impact on human health outcomes, and to subsequently characterize a) definitions of plant-based diversity used, b) methods used to assess plant-based food intake, c) methods used to assess plant- based food diversity, and d) health outcomes assessed and key findings.Eligible studies were those investigating the relationship or impact of plant-based food diversity on any health related or lifestyle outcome, by any study design, in high income countries only. Studies were identified by systematic searches of two electronic databases and manual searches of reference lists. No restrictions were applied for language or year of publication. The review was performed in line with the guidelines for Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews <jats:sup>(2)</jats:sup>.Forty-four studies were eligible for inclusion in this review. The majority of studies were observational in design (39/44; 87%) and included fruits and vegetables only in their definitions of plant-based food diversity (32/44, 72%). Methods of measurement of both plant-based food intake and diversity varied greatly among studies, with only four studies (9%) utilizing a tool validated for assessment of plant-based food diversity in their population of interest. Health outcomes included dietary intake and behaviour, socioeconomic factors, cardiometabolic risk factors, and cancer risk,. No randomized controlled trials investigating the impact of plant food diversity on health outcomes were identified.There is a need for a consensus definition of “diverse plant-based foods” incorporating all relevant foods from plant sources (e.g. legumes, nuts, herbs). Robust measurement tools and reporting guidelines for the assessment of plant-based food diversity in nutrition research studies will help to standardize research in this area. Within countries, an assessment of standard levels of intake of plant-based foods would be beneficial, in identifying whether diverse plant-based eating may be a target for dietary improvement. Observational studies report associations between plant-based food diversity and health outcomes, that warrant investigation in future randomized controlled trials.","PeriodicalId":20751,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Nutrition Society","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Nutrition Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0029665124004440","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plant-based foods encompass all food products derived from plant sources, such as fruits, vegetables, grains, legumes, herbs and spices, and nuts and seeds, plant-based fats and oils (e.g. olive oil) and plant-based beverages (e.g. tea and coffee). Consumption of diverse plant-based foods is a dietary pattern that has gained significant attention amongst the public, due to its perceived benefits for maintenance of health(1). Plant-based foods provide a rich source of macronutrients, micronutrients and non-nutrient bio-actives that are often reported to improve health outcomes. Despite this, there are no standard definitions of plant-based diversity, or consensus on methods of measurement in nutrition research studies. The objective of the current research was to conduct a scoping review of the literature to identify studies investigating plant-based food diversity and it’s impact on human health outcomes, and to subsequently characterize a) definitions of plant-based diversity used, b) methods used to assess plant-based food intake, c) methods used to assess plant- based food diversity, and d) health outcomes assessed and key findings.Eligible studies were those investigating the relationship or impact of plant-based food diversity on any health related or lifestyle outcome, by any study design, in high income countries only. Studies were identified by systematic searches of two electronic databases and manual searches of reference lists. No restrictions were applied for language or year of publication. The review was performed in line with the guidelines for Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (2).Forty-four studies were eligible for inclusion in this review. The majority of studies were observational in design (39/44; 87%) and included fruits and vegetables only in their definitions of plant-based food diversity (32/44, 72%). Methods of measurement of both plant-based food intake and diversity varied greatly among studies, with only four studies (9%) utilizing a tool validated for assessment of plant-based food diversity in their population of interest. Health outcomes included dietary intake and behaviour, socioeconomic factors, cardiometabolic risk factors, and cancer risk,. No randomized controlled trials investigating the impact of plant food diversity on health outcomes were identified.There is a need for a consensus definition of “diverse plant-based foods” incorporating all relevant foods from plant sources (e.g. legumes, nuts, herbs). Robust measurement tools and reporting guidelines for the assessment of plant-based food diversity in nutrition research studies will help to standardize research in this area. Within countries, an assessment of standard levels of intake of plant-based foods would be beneficial, in identifying whether diverse plant-based eating may be a target for dietary improvement. Observational studies report associations between plant-based food diversity and health outcomes, that warrant investigation in future randomized controlled trials.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
植物性食品消费的多样性:关于测量工具和相关健康结果的系统性范围审查
植物性食品包括所有从植物中提取的食品,如水果、蔬菜、谷物、豆类、香草和香料、坚果和种子、植物油脂(如橄榄油)以及植物饮料(如茶和咖啡)。食用各种植物性食品是一种膳食模式,因其对维护健康的益处而受到公众的极大关注(1)。植物性食品提供了丰富的宏量营养素、微量营养素和非营养素生物活性物质,据报道,这些物质往往能改善健康状况。尽管如此,对于植物性食物的多样性并没有标准的定义,营养研究中的测量方法也没有达成共识。本研究的目的是对文献进行范围界定,以确定调查植物性食物多样性及其对人类健康结果影响的研究,并随后描述 a) 所使用的植物性多样性定义;b) 用于评估植物性食物摄入量的方法;c) 用于评估植物性食物多样性的方法;d) 所评估的健康结果和主要发现。通过对两个电子数据库的系统检索和对参考文献列表的人工检索来确定研究。对语言或发表年份没有限制。综述是根据《系统综述和元分析扩展范围综述的首选报告项目》指南(2)进行的。大多数研究采用观察性设计(39/44;87%),在植物性食物多样性的定义中仅包括水果和蔬菜(32/44,72%)。不同研究对植物性食物摄入量和多样性的测量方法差异很大,只有四项研究(9%)使用了经过验证的工具来评估相关人群的植物性食物多样性。健康结果包括饮食摄入和行为、社会经济因素、心脏代谢风险因素和癌症风险。目前还没有发现调查植物性食物多样性对健康结果影响的随机对照试验。"多样化植物性食物 "的定义需要达成共识,包括所有相关的植物性食物(如豆类、坚果、草药)。用于评估营养研究中植物性食物多样性的可靠测量工具和报告指南将有助于实现该领域研究的标准化。在各国国内,对植物性食物摄入量的标准水平进行评估将有助于确定多样化的植物性饮食是否可以成为膳食改善的目标。观察性研究报告了植物性食物多样性与健康结果之间的联系,这值得在未来的随机对照试验中进行调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
190
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Proceedings of the Nutrition Society publishes papers and abstracts presented by members and invited speakers at the scientific meetings of The Nutrition Society. The journal provides an invaluable record of the scientific research currently being undertaken, contributing to ''the scientific study of nutrition and its application to the maintenance of human and animal health.'' The journal is of interest to academics, researchers and clinical practice workers in both human and animal nutrition and related fields.
期刊最新文献
Effects of Time-Restricted Eating on Body Composition, Biomarkers of Metabolism, Inflammation, Circadian System and Oxidative Stress in Overweight and Obesity: An Exploratory Review. Budgetary Tracking of Food and Nutrition Security Funding in selected Sahel and West Africa regions from 2017-2019. Chronotypical influence on eating behaviour and appetite control. The potential role of the Mediterranean Diet for the treatment and management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: a review of the pathophysiological mechanisms and clinical evidence. The relationship between dietary greenhouse gas emissions and demographic characteristics in high-income countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1