{"title":"Investigating Student Approaches to Rearranging Circuit Diagrams","authors":"Leah M. Ridgway;Tom Cox","doi":"10.1109/TE.2024.3410375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contribution: This study uses a qualitative research method to analyze interviews where participants simplified an electric circuit while explaining their thought process.Background: Rearranging circuit diagrams is a fundamental skill in electrical and electronic engineering, yet students can struggle with unfamiliar configurations. Current research in the discipline is often quantitative, centered on conceptual understanding. By using a qualitative method, the process of “How” students interact with circuit diagrams is investigated. Research Question: How do students approach circuit diagram simplifications? Methodology: 15-min individual discussions with ten participants (undergraduate years 1–4) simplifying an unconventionally presented circuit diagram were recorded. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to identify common themes. Findings: 1) Participants initially rely upon pattern recognition to solve circuit problems before applying other analysis techniques; 2) two rearrangement methods were identified: “component focused,” where combinations of components are grouped and then connected together, and “ground focused” where components in the circuit are related to ground and then connected together; 3) students using a ground focused strategy were less hesitant in their circuit rearrangement process; and 4) students broadly used mechanicalistic methods of error checking, selecting software tools rather than applying conceptual understanding.","PeriodicalId":55011,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10577445","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10577445/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Contribution: This study uses a qualitative research method to analyze interviews where participants simplified an electric circuit while explaining their thought process.Background: Rearranging circuit diagrams is a fundamental skill in electrical and electronic engineering, yet students can struggle with unfamiliar configurations. Current research in the discipline is often quantitative, centered on conceptual understanding. By using a qualitative method, the process of “How” students interact with circuit diagrams is investigated. Research Question: How do students approach circuit diagram simplifications? Methodology: 15-min individual discussions with ten participants (undergraduate years 1–4) simplifying an unconventionally presented circuit diagram were recorded. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to identify common themes. Findings: 1) Participants initially rely upon pattern recognition to solve circuit problems before applying other analysis techniques; 2) two rearrangement methods were identified: “component focused,” where combinations of components are grouped and then connected together, and “ground focused” where components in the circuit are related to ground and then connected together; 3) students using a ground focused strategy were less hesitant in their circuit rearrangement process; and 4) students broadly used mechanicalistic methods of error checking, selecting software tools rather than applying conceptual understanding.
期刊介绍:
The IEEE Transactions on Education (ToE) publishes significant and original scholarly contributions to education in electrical and electronics engineering, computer engineering, computer science, and other fields within the scope of interest of IEEE. Contributions must address discovery, integration, and/or application of knowledge in education in these fields. Articles must support contributions and assertions with compelling evidence and provide explicit, transparent descriptions of the processes through which the evidence is collected, analyzed, and interpreted. While characteristics of compelling evidence cannot be described to address every conceivable situation, generally assessment of the work being reported must go beyond student self-report and attitudinal data.