Environmental effects on faecal genotyping success in mesocarnivores

Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1007/s12686-024-01363-5
Lukas G. Scholz, Henriette Tripke, Cornelia Ebert, Thomas Alef, Jim-Lino Kämmerle, Ilse Storch, Manisha Bhardwaj
{"title":"Environmental effects on faecal genotyping success in mesocarnivores","authors":"Lukas G. Scholz, Henriette Tripke, Cornelia Ebert, Thomas Alef, Jim-Lino Kämmerle, Ilse Storch, Manisha Bhardwaj","doi":"10.1007/s12686-024-01363-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Non-invasive genetic sampling can be used in research, monitoring, and conservation of wild animals to, for example, provide insights into diets, identify individuals and estimate population sizes. Non-invasive genetic sampling may be especially useful to monitor elusive species because DNA can be derived from materials such as hairs and faeces without handling individuals. However, the reliability of the results derived from this technique is dependent on the quality of DNA obtained from samples, which can deteriorate from exposure to environmental conditions and sample age. While freshness of the sample is an important factor, the combined effect of different field conditions on the genotyping success is not fully understood. To address this gap, we systematically investigated the effects of sample age and environmental conditions on genotyping success of faeces, in an experimental setting of four treatments that combined rain and temperature conditions typical of central European climates. We compared the performance of a microsatellite marker set and a SNP panel for red fox (<i>Vulpes vulpes</i>), as well as a microsatellite marker set for pine marten (<i>Martes martes</i>) from faeces resampled over 21 days. We found that genotyping success decreased significantly with sample age, however environmental treatments did not impact the success. Furthermore, the SNPs we used amplified more successfully over time than the respective microsatellites. Therefore, the use of SNPs instead of conventional microsatellites, when using faecal samples for analysis relying on correct amplifications, could be advantageous. We recommend to prioritise the collection of fresh faeces regardless of environmental conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-024-01363-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Non-invasive genetic sampling can be used in research, monitoring, and conservation of wild animals to, for example, provide insights into diets, identify individuals and estimate population sizes. Non-invasive genetic sampling may be especially useful to monitor elusive species because DNA can be derived from materials such as hairs and faeces without handling individuals. However, the reliability of the results derived from this technique is dependent on the quality of DNA obtained from samples, which can deteriorate from exposure to environmental conditions and sample age. While freshness of the sample is an important factor, the combined effect of different field conditions on the genotyping success is not fully understood. To address this gap, we systematically investigated the effects of sample age and environmental conditions on genotyping success of faeces, in an experimental setting of four treatments that combined rain and temperature conditions typical of central European climates. We compared the performance of a microsatellite marker set and a SNP panel for red fox (Vulpes vulpes), as well as a microsatellite marker set for pine marten (Martes martes) from faeces resampled over 21 days. We found that genotyping success decreased significantly with sample age, however environmental treatments did not impact the success. Furthermore, the SNPs we used amplified more successfully over time than the respective microsatellites. Therefore, the use of SNPs instead of conventional microsatellites, when using faecal samples for analysis relying on correct amplifications, could be advantageous. We recommend to prioritise the collection of fresh faeces regardless of environmental conditions.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
环境对中食肉动物粪便基因分型成功率的影响
非侵入性基因采样可用于野生动物的研究、监测和保护,例如,深入了解动物的饮食习惯、识别个体和估计种群数量。非侵入性基因采样对监测难以捉摸的物种尤其有用,因为无需处理个体就能从毛发和粪便等材料中提取 DNA。不过,这种技术得出的结果是否可靠取决于从样本中获得的 DNA 的质量,因为暴露在环境条件下和样本的年龄会导致 DNA 质量下降。虽然样本的新鲜度是一个重要因素,但不同野外条件对基因分型成功率的综合影响尚未完全明了。为了填补这一空白,我们在结合欧洲中部典型气候的雨水和温度条件的四种实验环境中,系统地研究了样本年龄和环境条件对粪便基因分型成功率的影响。我们比较了红狐(Vulpes vulpes)的微卫星标记集和 SNP 面板的性能,以及松貂(Martes martes)的微卫星标记集的性能。我们发现,基因分型的成功率随着样本年龄的增加而显著降低,但环境处理对成功率没有影响。此外,我们使用的 SNP 随着时间的推移比相应的微卫星扩增更成功。因此,在使用粪便样本进行依赖于正确扩增的分析时,使用 SNP 而不是传统的微卫星可能会更有优势。我们建议,无论环境条件如何,都应优先采集新鲜粪便。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1