Do employers learn more from referrals than from other recruitment channels?

IF 2.2 2区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Labour Economics Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.labeco.2024.102574
{"title":"Do employers learn more from referrals than from other recruitment channels?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.labeco.2024.102574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We study whether referrals deliver better information about the productivity of new hires than other recruiting channels. Using combined vacancy-register data, we document that referrals are associated with less screening and lower search costs. We demonstrate that the referral wage premium is informative on referrals’ information advantage only if differences in screening are accounted for. Consistent with the predictions from a learning model, referrals increase new hires’ job stability and wages, with the effects diminishing over time. Results suggest that the referral information advantage is particularly pronounced for males and when employers use referrals as the only search channel.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48153,"journal":{"name":"Labour Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927537124000691/pdfft?md5=340eb52c130ab47c7e6d6b9f51137e9b&pid=1-s2.0-S0927537124000691-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labour Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927537124000691","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We study whether referrals deliver better information about the productivity of new hires than other recruiting channels. Using combined vacancy-register data, we document that referrals are associated with less screening and lower search costs. We demonstrate that the referral wage premium is informative on referrals’ information advantage only if differences in screening are accounted for. Consistent with the predictions from a learning model, referrals increase new hires’ job stability and wages, with the effects diminishing over time. Results suggest that the referral information advantage is particularly pronounced for males and when employers use referrals as the only search channel.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与其他招聘渠道相比,雇主从推荐中了解到的信息更多吗?
我们研究了推荐是否比其他招聘渠道更能提供有关新员工生产率的信息。利用空缺职位登记数据,我们发现推荐与较少的筛选和较低的搜索成本有关。我们证明,只有在考虑筛选差异的情况下,推荐工资溢价才能体现推荐的信息优势。与学习模型的预测相一致,推荐会增加新员工的工作稳定性和工资,但其效果会随着时间的推移而减弱。结果表明,推荐人的信息优势在男性和雇主将推荐人作为唯一搜索渠道时尤为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Labour Economics
Labour Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
142
期刊介绍: Labour Economics is devoted to publishing research in the field of labour economics both on the microeconomic and on the macroeconomic level, in a balanced mix of theory, empirical testing and policy applications. It gives due recognition to analysis and explanation of institutional arrangements of national labour markets and the impact of these institutions on labour market outcomes.
期刊最新文献
The labor market effects of facilitating social security contributions under part-time employment contracts: Evidence from Colombia Decomposing the exporter wage gap: Selection or differential returns? Heterogeneous effects of monetary and non-monetary job characteristics on job attractiveness in nursing Labour market impacts of the China shock: Why the tide of Globalisation did not lift all boats The value of commuting time, flexibility, and job security: Evidence from current and recent jobseekers in Flanders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1