The role of attention in the emergence of the evaluative and incidental self-reference effects.

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Memory Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-04 DOI:10.1080/09658211.2024.2371571
Christy Wong, Anaya S Navangul, Stephen C Philipps, Kyungmi Kim
{"title":"The role of attention in the emergence of the evaluative and incidental self-reference effects.","authors":"Christy Wong, Anaya S Navangul, Stephen C Philipps, Kyungmi Kim","doi":"10.1080/09658211.2024.2371571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The self-reference effect (SRE) is a memory advantage produced by encoding information in a self-relevant manner. The \"evaluative\" SRE arises when people engage in explicit self-evaluation/reflection to process to-be-remembered items, while the \"incidental\" SRE occurs when self-referential information (e.g., one's own name) is co-presented with to-be-remembered items but is irrelevant to a given task. Using a divided-attention paradigm, the present study examined potential differences in the attentional requirements of the evaluative and incidental SREs. During encoding, personality-trait words were presented simultaneously with the participant's own or a celebrity's name. The participants' task was either to evaluate whether each word described themselves/the celebrity (evaluative encoding) or to indicate the location of each word (incidental encoding), in the presence or absence of a secondary task. A subsequent recognition test with a remember/know procedure showed better overall recognition and enhanced episodic recollection for words presented with one's own name vs. another name, with this SRE being larger in the evaluative than incidental encoding condition. Critically, divided attention at encoding attenuated the magnitudes of both evaluative and incidental SREs to a comparable degree in overall recognition and episodic recollection. These findings suggest that both the evaluative and incidental SREs are resource-demanding, effortful mnemonic benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":18569,"journal":{"name":"Memory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memory","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2024.2371571","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The self-reference effect (SRE) is a memory advantage produced by encoding information in a self-relevant manner. The "evaluative" SRE arises when people engage in explicit self-evaluation/reflection to process to-be-remembered items, while the "incidental" SRE occurs when self-referential information (e.g., one's own name) is co-presented with to-be-remembered items but is irrelevant to a given task. Using a divided-attention paradigm, the present study examined potential differences in the attentional requirements of the evaluative and incidental SREs. During encoding, personality-trait words were presented simultaneously with the participant's own or a celebrity's name. The participants' task was either to evaluate whether each word described themselves/the celebrity (evaluative encoding) or to indicate the location of each word (incidental encoding), in the presence or absence of a secondary task. A subsequent recognition test with a remember/know procedure showed better overall recognition and enhanced episodic recollection for words presented with one's own name vs. another name, with this SRE being larger in the evaluative than incidental encoding condition. Critically, divided attention at encoding attenuated the magnitudes of both evaluative and incidental SREs to a comparable degree in overall recognition and episodic recollection. These findings suggest that both the evaluative and incidental SREs are resource-demanding, effortful mnemonic benefits.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
注意力在评价性和偶然性自我参照效应中的作用。
自我参照效应(SRE)是以自我相关的方式对信息进行编码所产生的一种记忆优势。当人们在处理待记忆项目时进行明确的自我评价/反思时,就会产生 "评价性 "自我参照效应;而当自我参照信息(如自己的名字)与待记忆项目同时出现但与特定任务无关时,就会产生 "偶然性 "自我参照效应。本研究采用分心范式,考察了评价性 SRE 和偶然性 SRE 在注意要求上的潜在差异。在编码过程中,个性特征词与被试本人或名人的名字同时出现。参与者的任务是在有或没有次要任务的情况下,评估每个词是否描述了自己/名人(评价性编码)或指出每个词的位置(附带编码)。随后进行的记忆/知道程序识别测试表明,对于出现自己名字和他人名字的单词,总体识别能力更强,外显回忆能力更强,而在评价性编码条件下,外显回忆能力比附带编码条件下更强。重要的是,编码时的分散注意会减弱评价性和附带性 SRE 的大小,在整体识别和外显回忆中的减弱程度相当。这些发现表明,评价性和附带性 SRE 都是需要资源的、费力的记忆性益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Memory
Memory PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: Memory publishes high quality papers in all areas of memory research. This includes experimental studies of memory (including laboratory-based research, everyday memory studies, and applied memory research), developmental, educational, neuropsychological, clinical and social research on memory. By representing all significant areas of memory research, the journal cuts across the traditional distinctions of psychological research. Memory therefore provides a unique venue for memory researchers to communicate their findings and ideas both to peers within their own research tradition in the study of memory, and also to the wider range of research communities with direct interest in human memory.
期刊最新文献
Flashbulb and first-hand memories for campus closings due to COVID-19: consistency and change. Effectiveness of production and drawing as encoding techniques on recall using mixed- and pure-list designs. Inducing positive involuntary mental imagery in daily life using personalized photograph stimuli. Negative life events predict depressive trends: the moderating effect of overgeneral autobiographical memory and early parenting behaviour. You don't understand me! But, I do! Awareness of cross-generational differences in collective remembering of national historic events.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1