The Fundamental Role of Character Coding in Bayesian Morphological Phylogenetics.

IF 6.1 1区 生物学 Q1 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY Systematic Biology Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1093/sysbio/syae033
Basanta Khakurel, Courtney Grigsby, Tyler D Tran, Juned Zariwala, Sebastian Höhna, April M Wright
{"title":"The Fundamental Role of Character Coding in Bayesian Morphological Phylogenetics.","authors":"Basanta Khakurel, Courtney Grigsby, Tyler D Tran, Juned Zariwala, Sebastian Höhna, April M Wright","doi":"10.1093/sysbio/syae033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Phylogenetic trees establish a historical context for the study of organismal form and function. Most phylogenetic trees are estimated using a model of evolution. For molecular data, modeling evolution is often based on biochemical observations about changes between character states. For example, there are 4 nucleotides, and we can make assumptions about the probability of transitions between them. By contrast, for morphological characters, we may not know a priori how many characters states there are per character, as both extant sampling and the fossil record may be highly incomplete, which leads to an observer bias. For a given character, the state space may be larger than what has been observed in the sample of taxa collected by the researcher. In this case, how many evolutionary rates are needed to even describe transitions between morphological character states may not be clear, potentially leading to model misspecification. To explore the impact of this model misspecification, we simulated character data with varying numbers of character states per character. We then used the data to estimate phylogenetic trees using models of evolution with the correct number of character states and an incorrect number of character states. The results of this study indicate that this observer bias may lead to phylogenetic error, particularly in the branch lengths of trees. If the state space is wrongly assumed to be too large, then we underestimate the branch lengths, and the opposite occurs when the state space is wrongly assumed to be too small.</p>","PeriodicalId":22120,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Biology","volume":" ","pages":"861-871"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syae033","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Phylogenetic trees establish a historical context for the study of organismal form and function. Most phylogenetic trees are estimated using a model of evolution. For molecular data, modeling evolution is often based on biochemical observations about changes between character states. For example, there are 4 nucleotides, and we can make assumptions about the probability of transitions between them. By contrast, for morphological characters, we may not know a priori how many characters states there are per character, as both extant sampling and the fossil record may be highly incomplete, which leads to an observer bias. For a given character, the state space may be larger than what has been observed in the sample of taxa collected by the researcher. In this case, how many evolutionary rates are needed to even describe transitions between morphological character states may not be clear, potentially leading to model misspecification. To explore the impact of this model misspecification, we simulated character data with varying numbers of character states per character. We then used the data to estimate phylogenetic trees using models of evolution with the correct number of character states and an incorrect number of character states. The results of this study indicate that this observer bias may lead to phylogenetic error, particularly in the branch lengths of trees. If the state space is wrongly assumed to be too large, then we underestimate the branch lengths, and the opposite occurs when the state space is wrongly assumed to be too small.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
贝叶斯形态系统学中特征编码的基本作用。
系统发生树为研究生物体的形态和功能提供了历史背景。大多数系统发生树都是通过进化模型来估算的。对于分子数据,进化模型通常基于对特征状态之间变化的生化观察。例如,有四种核苷酸,我们可以对它们之间的转换概率做出假设。相比之下,对于形态特征而言,我们可能无法先验地知道每个特征有多少种特征状态,因为现存取样和化石记录都可能非常不完整,这就导致了观察者偏差。对于一个给定的特征,其状态空间可能比研究者收集的类群样本中观察到的更大。在这种情况下,需要多少进化率才能描述形态特征状态之间的转变可能并不清楚,从而可能导致模型的错误规范。为了探究这种模型不规范的影响,我们模拟了每个特征具有不同数量特征状态的特征数据。然后,我们利用这些数据,使用具有正确特征状态数和不正确特征状态数的进化模型来估计系统发生树。研究结果表明,这种观察者偏差可能会导致系统发育错误,尤其是在树的分支长度方面。如果错误地假定状态空间过大,那么我们就会低估分支长度,而如果错误地假定状态空间过小,则会出现相反的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Systematic Biology
Systematic Biology 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
70
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Biology is the bimonthly journal of the Society of Systematic Biologists. Papers for the journal are original contributions to the theory, principles, and methods of systematics as well as phylogeny, evolution, morphology, biogeography, paleontology, genetics, and the classification of all living things. A Points of View section offers a forum for discussion, while book reviews and announcements of general interest are also featured.
期刊最新文献
A Double-edged Sword: Evolutionary Novelty along Deep-time Diversity Oscillation in An Iconic Group of Predatory Insects (Neuroptera: Mantispoidea) Are Modern Cryptic Species Detectable in the Fossil Record? A Case Study on Agamid Lizards. Bayesian Selection of Relaxed-clock Models: Distinguishing Between Independent and Autocorrelated Rates. Testing relationships between multiple regional features and biogeographic processes of speciation, extinction, and dispersal Robustness of Divergence Time Estimation Despite Gene Tree Estimation Error: A Case Study of Fireflies (Coleoptera: Lampyridae)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1