A study on the formative usability testing for modular powered wheelchair.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology Pub Date : 2024-07-04 DOI:10.1080/17483107.2024.2372310
Jin Hong Kim, Yu Ri Kim, Mi Hyang Han, Soul Han, Eun Hye Jeon, Eun Young Hwang, Jae Won Yang, Seon Yeong Lee, Gangpyo Lee
{"title":"A study on the formative usability testing for modular powered wheelchair.","authors":"Jin Hong Kim, Yu Ri Kim, Mi Hyang Han, Soul Han, Eun Hye Jeon, Eun Young Hwang, Jae Won Yang, Seon Yeong Lee, Gangpyo Lee","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2024.2372310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The increasing prevalence of mobility impairments underscores the urgent need for accessible and affordable mobility aids. To overcome the mobility limitations of people with disabilities, there is an increasing need for the development of lightweight and portable powered wheelchairs that can be easily loaded. This study aimed to perform an early health technology assessment and a formative usability evaluation on a modular (detachable) powered wheelchair. It aimed to gauge device satisfaction among users, pinpoint areas for improvement, and detect any unforeseen errors to inform future development. Engaging 16 participants, including powered wheelchair users, healthcare professionals, and caregivers, the research evaluated the wheelchair's functionality in various scenarios, emphasizing safety, effectiveness, and convenience. Statistical analyses of task performance and satisfaction surveys highlighted that, while powered wheelchair users successfully completed tasks focusing on driving and power control, healthcare professionals and caregivers encountered difficulties with the wheelchair's assembly and disassembly. Despite general positivity, the surveys indicated mixed satisfaction levels regarding safety, validity, and convenience, with specific issues related to frame durability, seat comfort, and control mechanisms. These findings suggest that refining the wheelchair's design and addressing user concerns could significantly enhance satisfaction and mobility services. Future efforts will include a thorough review of an advanced prototype and further satisfaction assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2024.2372310","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of mobility impairments underscores the urgent need for accessible and affordable mobility aids. To overcome the mobility limitations of people with disabilities, there is an increasing need for the development of lightweight and portable powered wheelchairs that can be easily loaded. This study aimed to perform an early health technology assessment and a formative usability evaluation on a modular (detachable) powered wheelchair. It aimed to gauge device satisfaction among users, pinpoint areas for improvement, and detect any unforeseen errors to inform future development. Engaging 16 participants, including powered wheelchair users, healthcare professionals, and caregivers, the research evaluated the wheelchair's functionality in various scenarios, emphasizing safety, effectiveness, and convenience. Statistical analyses of task performance and satisfaction surveys highlighted that, while powered wheelchair users successfully completed tasks focusing on driving and power control, healthcare professionals and caregivers encountered difficulties with the wheelchair's assembly and disassembly. Despite general positivity, the surveys indicated mixed satisfaction levels regarding safety, validity, and convenience, with specific issues related to frame durability, seat comfort, and control mechanisms. These findings suggest that refining the wheelchair's design and addressing user concerns could significantly enhance satisfaction and mobility services. Future efforts will include a thorough review of an advanced prototype and further satisfaction assessments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模块化电动轮椅的形成性可用性测试研究。
行动不便的人越来越多,这凸显了对无障碍且经济实惠的助行器具的迫切需求。为了克服残疾人的行动限制,人们越来越需要开发轻便、易于装载的便携式电动轮椅。本研究旨在对模块化(可拆卸)电动轮椅进行早期健康技术评估和形成性可用性评价。其目的是衡量用户对设备的满意度,找出需要改进的地方,并发现任何不可预见的错误,为今后的开发提供参考。这项研究吸引了包括电动轮椅用户、医疗保健专业人员和护理人员在内的 16 名参与者参与,对轮椅在各种场景下的功能进行了评估,强调了安全性、有效性和便利性。对任务执行情况和满意度调查的统计分析表明,虽然电动轮椅使用者成功完成了以驾驶和动力控制为重点的任务,但医护人员和护理人员在组装和拆卸轮椅时遇到了困难。尽管总体上是积极的,但调查显示,对安全性、有效性和便利性的满意度参差不齐,具体问题涉及轮椅框架的耐用性、座椅的舒适性和控制机制。这些调查结果表明,改进轮椅的设计和解决用户关心的问题可以大大提高满意度和移动服务。未来的工作将包括对先进的原型进行全面审查和进一步的满意度评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
13.60%
发文量
128
期刊最新文献
Skills on wheels: caregiver perspectives on the design and long-term impact of a pediatric wheelchair Skills training program. Outcome measurement of cognitive impairment and dementia in serious digital games: a scoping review. Evaluating multi-channel interaction design for enhancing Pose accuracy in yoga training among visually impaired individuals. Validity of a wrist-worn consumer-grade wearable for estimating energy expenditure, sedentary behaviour, and physical activity in manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury. How does moderate upper limb activity modify sitting forces for able-bodied persons and wheelchair users?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1