Modern paradigms in biologic sequencing of inflammatory bowel disease in Aotearoa New Zealand.

IF 1.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL Pub Date : 2024-07-05 DOI:10.26635/6965.6613
Michael Chieng, Bronson Marshall, Caroline Jiang
{"title":"Modern paradigms in biologic sequencing of inflammatory bowel disease in Aotearoa New Zealand.","authors":"Michael Chieng, Bronson Marshall, Caroline Jiang","doi":"10.26635/6965.6613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The modern treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has evolved significantly in recent years. This includes development of new pharmacologic therapies and their implementation in clinical practice. Moderate-to-severe IBD represents a group of patients at risk of poorer outcomes, and mounting evidence suggests biologic and small molecule medications, collectively termed advanced therapies, are the most effective tools clinicians possess. Even with biologic treatment, many patients do not respond or lose response over time. Until recently, most randomised trials demonstrating efficacy and safety of biologics have been placebo-controlled with a lack of head-to-head studies. Therefore, selecting the right medication for the appropriate clinical scenario can be difficult. In addition, there is evidence of differing clinical success when positioning biologic treatments in different sequences. This is important, as one-third of patients treated with biologics will require a switch to a second agent by 12 months, and a further 20% will require a third agent. Over the years, there have been widespread calls in Aotearoa New Zealand for increasing biologic treatment options. Ustekinumab and vedolizumab received public funding for the treatment of moderate-to-severe IBD in 2023, and this has presented long-awaited opportunities for patients, but also new challenges for clinicians in regard to treatment selection. The purpose of this document is to provide guidance to clinicians on biologic selection, sequencing and optimisation for IBD. These recommendations are specific to the domestic prescribing climate, supported by the best available evidence and endorsed by the New Zealand Society of Gastroenterology IBD Working Group.</p>","PeriodicalId":48086,"journal":{"name":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26635/6965.6613","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The modern treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has evolved significantly in recent years. This includes development of new pharmacologic therapies and their implementation in clinical practice. Moderate-to-severe IBD represents a group of patients at risk of poorer outcomes, and mounting evidence suggests biologic and small molecule medications, collectively termed advanced therapies, are the most effective tools clinicians possess. Even with biologic treatment, many patients do not respond or lose response over time. Until recently, most randomised trials demonstrating efficacy and safety of biologics have been placebo-controlled with a lack of head-to-head studies. Therefore, selecting the right medication for the appropriate clinical scenario can be difficult. In addition, there is evidence of differing clinical success when positioning biologic treatments in different sequences. This is important, as one-third of patients treated with biologics will require a switch to a second agent by 12 months, and a further 20% will require a third agent. Over the years, there have been widespread calls in Aotearoa New Zealand for increasing biologic treatment options. Ustekinumab and vedolizumab received public funding for the treatment of moderate-to-severe IBD in 2023, and this has presented long-awaited opportunities for patients, but also new challenges for clinicians in regard to treatment selection. The purpose of this document is to provide guidance to clinicians on biologic selection, sequencing and optimisation for IBD. These recommendations are specific to the domestic prescribing climate, supported by the best available evidence and endorsed by the New Zealand Society of Gastroenterology IBD Working Group.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新西兰奥特亚罗瓦炎症性肠病生物测序的现代范例。
近年来,炎症性肠病(IBD)的现代治疗方法有了长足的发展。这包括新药物疗法的开发及其在临床实践中的应用。中度至重度 IBD 患者的预后可能较差,越来越多的证据表明,生物制剂和小分子药物(统称为先进疗法)是临床医生掌握的最有效工具。即使使用生物制剂治疗,许多患者也没有反应或随着时间的推移失去反应。直到最近,大多数证明生物制剂疗效和安全性的随机试验都是安慰剂对照试验,缺乏头对头研究。因此,在适当的临床情况下选择正确的药物可能很困难。此外,有证据表明,将生物制剂治疗按不同顺序排列会取得不同的临床疗效。这一点非常重要,因为三分之一接受生物制剂治疗的患者在 12 个月后需要换用第二种药物,还有 20% 的患者需要换用第三种药物。多年来,新西兰奥特亚罗瓦地区广泛呼吁增加生物制剂治疗方案。Ustekinumab 和 vedolizumab 于 2023 年获得公共资助,用于治疗中度至重度 IBD,这为患者带来了期待已久的机会,但也为临床医生的治疗选择带来了新的挑战。本文件旨在就 IBD 的生物制剂选择、排序和优化为临床医生提供指导。这些建议针对国内的处方环境,以现有的最佳证据为依据,并得到了新西兰胃肠病学会 IBD 工作组的认可。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL
NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
23.50%
发文量
229
期刊最新文献
A quality improvement project: Rapid Access Hysteroscopy Clinics with nurse pre-procedural telephone support in the outpatient setting. Accuracy of ethnicity records at primary and secondary healthcare services in Waikato region, Aotearoa New Zealand. Caution ahead: the risks with regulating physician associates in Aotearoa. Commissioners or board-which is best for the role of Health New Zealand - Te Whatu Ora? Compartment syndrome resulting from carbon monoxide poisoning: a case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1