Implementation of a North Dakota opioid misuse and overdose prevention program in West Virginia

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of the American Pharmacists Association Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1016/j.japh.2024.102152
{"title":"Implementation of a North Dakota opioid misuse and overdose prevention program in West Virginia","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.japh.2024.102152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Pharmacy has an important role in combating the opioid epidemic. However, there is a need for more consistency of programs and evidence-based practices across the country.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To describe how an evidence-based opioid misuse and overdose prevention program that originated in North Dakota was implemented in West Virginia and to compare program results between the two states including pharmacist interventions and patient screening for opioid misuse and overdose.</p></div><div><h3>Practice description</h3><p>This advancement in practice took place in participating North Dakota and West Virginia community pharmacies.</p></div><div><h3>Practice innovation</h3><p>An evidence-based program that originated in North Dakota was implemented in West Virginia. The details of this collaboration are outlined in this manuscript.</p></div><div><h3>Evaluation methods</h3><p>Program screening and pharmacist intervention data were collected using DocStation, an online pharmacy patient management platform.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirty-four pharmacies in West Virginia implemented the program. Between April 2022 and September 2023, a total of 34 West Virginia pharmacies conducted 449 documented screenings compared to 12,105 screenings by 81 pharmacies in North Dakota over the same time. There were differences between the states with regard to the proportion of individuals screened as high-risk for opioid use disorder and individuals at risk of accidental opioid overdose likely attributable to different demographics.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>An opioid misuse and prevention program was successfully implemented in two states, which can serve as a model to implement similar programs in other pharmacies across the United States.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544319124001729","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Pharmacy has an important role in combating the opioid epidemic. However, there is a need for more consistency of programs and evidence-based practices across the country.

Objectives

To describe how an evidence-based opioid misuse and overdose prevention program that originated in North Dakota was implemented in West Virginia and to compare program results between the two states including pharmacist interventions and patient screening for opioid misuse and overdose.

Practice description

This advancement in practice took place in participating North Dakota and West Virginia community pharmacies.

Practice innovation

An evidence-based program that originated in North Dakota was implemented in West Virginia. The details of this collaboration are outlined in this manuscript.

Evaluation methods

Program screening and pharmacist intervention data were collected using DocStation, an online pharmacy patient management platform.

Results

Thirty-four pharmacies in West Virginia implemented the program. Between April 2022 and September 2023, a total of 34 West Virginia pharmacies conducted 449 documented screenings compared to 12,105 screenings by 81 pharmacies in North Dakota over the same time. There were differences between the states with regard to the proportion of individuals screened as high-risk for opioid use disorder and individuals at risk of accidental opioid overdose likely attributable to different demographics.

Conclusion

An opioid misuse and prevention program was successfully implemented in two states, which can serve as a model to implement similar programs in other pharmacies across the United States.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在西弗吉尼亚州实施北达科他州阿片类药物滥用和过量预防计划。
背景:药学在抗击阿片类药物流行方面发挥着重要作用。然而,全国各地的计划和循证实践需要更加一致:描述如何在西弗吉尼亚州实施一项源自北达科他州的阿片类药物滥用和过量预防循证计划,并比较两个州的计划成果,包括药剂师干预和阿片类药物滥用和过量患者筛查:实践创新:实践创新:在西弗吉尼亚州实施了一项源自北达科他州的循证计划。本手稿概述了这一合作的细节:评估方法:使用在线药房患者管理平台 DocStation 收集项目筛选和药剂师干预数据:结果:西弗吉尼亚州的 34 家药房实施了该计划。2022 年 4 月至 2023 年 9 月期间,西弗吉尼亚州共有 34 家药房进行了 449 次有记录的筛查,而同期北达科他州有 81 家药房进行了 12105 次筛查。各州被筛查为阿片类药物滥用高风险人群和意外阿片类药物过量风险人群的比例存在差异,这可能是由于人口统计学特征不同所致:两个州成功实施了阿片类药物滥用和预防计划,可作为在全美其他药店实施类似计划的典范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
336
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Pharmacists Association is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Pharmacists Association (APhA), providing information on pharmaceutical care, drug therapy, diseases and other health issues, trends in pharmacy practice and therapeutics, informed opinion, and original research. JAPhA publishes original research, reviews, experiences, and opinion articles that link science to contemporary pharmacy practice to improve patient care.
期刊最新文献
Bringing Providers into the Community Pharmacy: Experiential Education. Feasibility of reaching populations at high risk for HIV in community pharmacies A shared passion for providing care Addressing health literacy and patient communication from the lens of science Pharmacists are the medication, and medication literacy, experts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1