Report of case series: Correlation between pathological and radiological evaluation and clinical course of three cases of metastatic renal cell carcinoma with cytoreductive nephrectomy after combined immuno-oncology therapy
Yuichiro Atagi, Kouki Tada, Reina Kouno, Ryoei Minato, Katsuyoshi Hashine
{"title":"Report of case series: Correlation between pathological and radiological evaluation and clinical course of three cases of metastatic renal cell carcinoma with cytoreductive nephrectomy after combined immuno-oncology therapy","authors":"Yuichiro Atagi, Kouki Tada, Reina Kouno, Ryoei Minato, Katsuyoshi Hashine","doi":"10.1002/iju5.12752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>The pathologic evaluation and clinical course of cytoreductive nephrectomy after combined immuno-oncology therapy were reviewed to understand the benefits of cytoreductive nephrectomy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Case presentation</h3>\n \n <p>Three patients with clear cell carcinoma underwent tumor biopsy before combined immuno-oncology therapy. Case 1 was found to have a sarcomatoid component upon nephrectomy and continued with combined immuno-oncology therapy. Case 2 discontinued combined immuno-oncology therapy due to adverse events but maintained tumor shrinkage. The patient was found to have viable cells in most nephrectomy specimens but has had no recurrence after combined immuno-oncology therapy was discontinued. In case 3, the residual tumor was deemed resectable with combined immuno-oncology therapy, and nephrectomy and metastasectomy were performed. No viable cells were observed in either specimen, and the patient has had no recurrence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Cytoreductive nephrectomy after combined immuno-oncology therapy may be useful to allow pathologic evaluation of treatment and provide an indicator for subsequent treatment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":52909,"journal":{"name":"IJU Case Reports","volume":"7 4","pages":"341-345"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11221940/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJU Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/iju5.12752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
The pathologic evaluation and clinical course of cytoreductive nephrectomy after combined immuno-oncology therapy were reviewed to understand the benefits of cytoreductive nephrectomy.
Case presentation
Three patients with clear cell carcinoma underwent tumor biopsy before combined immuno-oncology therapy. Case 1 was found to have a sarcomatoid component upon nephrectomy and continued with combined immuno-oncology therapy. Case 2 discontinued combined immuno-oncology therapy due to adverse events but maintained tumor shrinkage. The patient was found to have viable cells in most nephrectomy specimens but has had no recurrence after combined immuno-oncology therapy was discontinued. In case 3, the residual tumor was deemed resectable with combined immuno-oncology therapy, and nephrectomy and metastasectomy were performed. No viable cells were observed in either specimen, and the patient has had no recurrence.
Conclusion
Cytoreductive nephrectomy after combined immuno-oncology therapy may be useful to allow pathologic evaluation of treatment and provide an indicator for subsequent treatment.