Should the CEO be the “face” of crisis response? Examining types of visuals on social media in corporate crisis communication

IF 2.6 3区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management Pub Date : 2024-07-05 DOI:10.1111/1468-5973.12596
Bora Yook, Don W. Stacks
{"title":"Should the CEO be the “face” of crisis response? Examining types of visuals on social media in corporate crisis communication","authors":"Bora Yook,&nbsp;Don W. Stacks","doi":"10.1111/1468-5973.12596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aims to suggest visual strategies for social media response in corporate crisis communication. Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT) and Associative Network Theory of Memory (ANT) are applied to investigate the types of visuals (photos) that companies may utilize in Facebook messages. A 3 (message: excuse vs. attack accuser vs. apology) × 4 (photo: no-image vs. product vs. <i>stereotypical</i> CEO vs. CEO reflecting corporate character) between-subject design online experiment was conducted in the United States (<i>N</i> = 296). The results confirmed the effect of message strategies on crisis communication outcomes such as perceived responsibility, anger, and reputation. Preliminary interaction effects showed that the stereotypical CEO image (e.g., wearing a suit at a podium in a conference setting) was effective on reputation in two message strategies: an excuse in an accidental cluster crisis and an apology in a preventable cluster crisis. Based on these findings, the current study offers theoretical and practical implications for corporate crisis communication. Details are discussed in the study.</p>","PeriodicalId":47674,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-5973.12596","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to suggest visual strategies for social media response in corporate crisis communication. Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT) and Associative Network Theory of Memory (ANT) are applied to investigate the types of visuals (photos) that companies may utilize in Facebook messages. A 3 (message: excuse vs. attack accuser vs. apology) × 4 (photo: no-image vs. product vs. stereotypical CEO vs. CEO reflecting corporate character) between-subject design online experiment was conducted in the United States (N = 296). The results confirmed the effect of message strategies on crisis communication outcomes such as perceived responsibility, anger, and reputation. Preliminary interaction effects showed that the stereotypical CEO image (e.g., wearing a suit at a podium in a conference setting) was effective on reputation in two message strategies: an excuse in an accidental cluster crisis and an apology in a preventable cluster crisis. Based on these findings, the current study offers theoretical and practical implications for corporate crisis communication. Details are discussed in the study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
首席执行官是否应该成为危机应对的 "代言人"?研究企业危机公关中社交媒体的视觉效果类型
本研究旨在为企业危机公关中的社交媒体应对提出视觉策略建议。本研究运用情景危机传播理论(SCCT)和联想记忆网络理论(ANT)来研究企业在 Facebook 消息中可能使用的视觉效果(照片)类型。在美国进行了一项 3(信息:借口 vs. 攻击指责者 vs. 道歉)×4(照片:无图像 vs. 产品 vs. 刻板 CEO vs. 反映企业特征的 CEO)的主体间设计在线实验(N = 296)。实验结果证实了信息策略对危机传播结果的影响,如感知责任、愤怒和声誉。初步的交互效应显示,在两种信息策略中,刻板的首席执行官形象(例如,在会议环境中穿着西装站在讲台上)对声誉有效:在意外的群体危机中提供借口,在可预防的群体危机中道歉。基于这些发现,本研究为企业危机公关提供了理论和实践启示。详细内容将在研究报告中讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
12.90%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management is an invaluable source of information on all aspects of contingency planning, scenario analysis and crisis management in both corporate and public sectors. It focuses on the opportunities and threats facing organizations and presents analysis and case studies of crisis prevention, crisis planning, recovery and turnaround management. With contributions from world-wide sources including corporations, governmental agencies, think tanks and influential academics, this publication provides a vital platform for the exchange of strategic and operational experience, information and knowledge.
期刊最新文献
The wet stuff: An exploration of the UK's water rescue community from the middle From plan to practice: Interorganizational crisis response networks from governmental guidelines and real‐world collaborations during hurricane events The point of no return: Crisis management lessons from US adults' infectious disease risk (IDR) perception and response to the Flu‐and‐COVID dual threat Deciphering the dynamics of risk perception: Emotional and cognitive responses to new energy vehicle crises on social media Strategizing emergency management strategies: A dynamic perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1