Polymyalgia rheumatica is a risk factor for more recalcitrant disease in giant cell arteritis: A retrospective cohort study

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism Pub Date : 2024-06-28 DOI:10.1016/j.semarthrit.2024.152499
Lien Moreel , Albrecht Betrains , Lennert Boeckxstaens , Geert Molenberghs , Koen Van Laere , Ellen De Langhe , Steven Vanderschueren , Daniel Blockmans
{"title":"Polymyalgia rheumatica is a risk factor for more recalcitrant disease in giant cell arteritis: A retrospective cohort study","authors":"Lien Moreel ,&nbsp;Albrecht Betrains ,&nbsp;Lennert Boeckxstaens ,&nbsp;Geert Molenberghs ,&nbsp;Koen Van Laere ,&nbsp;Ellen De Langhe ,&nbsp;Steven Vanderschueren ,&nbsp;Daniel Blockmans","doi":"10.1016/j.semarthrit.2024.152499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To evaluate differences in presentation and outcome of giant cell arteritis (GCA) patients with and without polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) symptoms.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Consecutive patients diagnosed with GCA between 2000 and 2020 and followed for ≥12 months at the University Hospitals Leuven (Belgium), were included retrospectively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 398 GCA patients, of which 181 (45%) with PMR symptoms. Patients with PMR symptoms had a longer symptom duration (11 vs 6 weeks, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). They less frequently reported fever (19% vs 28%, <em>p</em> = 0.030) and fatigue (52% vs 64%, <em>p</em> = 0.015) and tended to have less permanent vision loss (12% vs 19%, <em>p</em> = 0.052). There was no difference in the cumulative oral GC dose at 2 years (4.4 vs 4.3 g methylprednisolone, <em>p</em> = 0.571). However, those with PMR symptoms were treated with higher GC doses during subsequent follow-up (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05 from 38 months after diagnosis) and had a lower probability of stopping GC (62% vs 71%, HR 0.74 [95%CI 0.58–0.94], <em>p</em> = 0.018) with a longer median duration of GC treatment (29 vs 23 months, <em>p</em> = 0.021). In addition, presence of PMR symptoms was associated with an increased risk of relapse (64% vs 51%, HR 1.38 [95%CI 1.06–1.79], <em>p</em> = 0.017) with a higher number of relapses (1.47 [95%CI 1.30–1.65] vs 1.16 relapses [95%CI 1.02–1.31], <em>p</em> = 0.007). Patients with PMR symptoms less frequently developed thoracic aortic aneurysms during follow-up (3% vs 11%, <em>p</em> = 0.005).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>GCA patients with PMR symptoms had more recalcitrant disease with a higher risk of relapse and longer duration of GC treatment with need for higher GC doses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21715,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049017224001392","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate differences in presentation and outcome of giant cell arteritis (GCA) patients with and without polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) symptoms.

Methods

Consecutive patients diagnosed with GCA between 2000 and 2020 and followed for ≥12 months at the University Hospitals Leuven (Belgium), were included retrospectively.

Results

We included 398 GCA patients, of which 181 (45%) with PMR symptoms. Patients with PMR symptoms had a longer symptom duration (11 vs 6 weeks, p < 0.001). They less frequently reported fever (19% vs 28%, p = 0.030) and fatigue (52% vs 64%, p = 0.015) and tended to have less permanent vision loss (12% vs 19%, p = 0.052). There was no difference in the cumulative oral GC dose at 2 years (4.4 vs 4.3 g methylprednisolone, p = 0.571). However, those with PMR symptoms were treated with higher GC doses during subsequent follow-up (p < 0.05 from 38 months after diagnosis) and had a lower probability of stopping GC (62% vs 71%, HR 0.74 [95%CI 0.58–0.94], p = 0.018) with a longer median duration of GC treatment (29 vs 23 months, p = 0.021). In addition, presence of PMR symptoms was associated with an increased risk of relapse (64% vs 51%, HR 1.38 [95%CI 1.06–1.79], p = 0.017) with a higher number of relapses (1.47 [95%CI 1.30–1.65] vs 1.16 relapses [95%CI 1.02–1.31], p = 0.007). Patients with PMR symptoms less frequently developed thoracic aortic aneurysms during follow-up (3% vs 11%, p = 0.005).

Conclusion

GCA patients with PMR symptoms had more recalcitrant disease with a higher risk of relapse and longer duration of GC treatment with need for higher GC doses.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多发性风湿痛是巨细胞动脉炎病情更加顽固的风险因素:一项回顾性队列研究
摘要评估伴有和不伴有多发性风湿病(PMR)症状的巨细胞动脉炎(GCA)患者在表现和预后方面的差异:方法:回顾性纳入 2000 年至 2020 年期间在比利时鲁汶大学医院确诊为 GCA 并随访≥12 个月的连续患者:结果:我们纳入了398名GCA患者,其中181人(45%)有PMR症状。有 PMR 症状的患者症状持续时间较长(11 周对 6 周,P < 0.001)。他们较少报告发热(19% 对 28%,p = 0.030)和疲劳(52% 对 64%,p = 0.015),视力永久丧失的比例也较低(12% 对 19%,p = 0.052)。2 年的累积口服 GC 剂量没有差异(4.4 对 4.3 克甲泼尼龙,p = 0.571)。然而,有 PMR 症状的患者在随后的随访中接受的 GC 治疗剂量更高(从确诊后 38 个月起,p < 0.05),停止 GC 治疗的概率更低(62% 对 71%,HR 0.74 [95%CI 0.58-0.94],p = 0.018),GC 治疗的中位持续时间更长(29 个月对 23 个月,p = 0.021)。此外,出现 PMR 症状与复发风险增加有关(64% vs 51%,HR 1.38 [95%CI 1.06-1.79],p = 0.017),复发次数较多(1.47 [95%CI 1.30-1.65] vs 1.16 次复发 [95%CI 1.02-1.31],p = 0.007)。有PMR症状的患者在随访期间较少发生胸主动脉瘤(3% vs 11%,P = 0.005):结论:有 PMR 症状的 GCA 患者病情更顽固,复发风险更高,GC 治疗时间更长,需要的 GC 剂量更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
176
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism provides access to the highest-quality clinical, therapeutic and translational research about arthritis, rheumatology and musculoskeletal disorders that affect the joints and connective tissue. Each bimonthly issue includes articles giving you the latest diagnostic criteria, consensus statements, systematic reviews and meta-analyses as well as clinical and translational research studies. Read this journal for the latest groundbreaking research and to gain insights from scientists and clinicians on the management and treatment of musculoskeletal and autoimmune rheumatologic diseases. The journal is of interest to rheumatologists, orthopedic surgeons, internal medicine physicians, immunologists and specialists in bone and mineral metabolism.
期刊最新文献
Real-world assessment of the efficacy and tolerability profile of JAK inhibitors in difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis Systematic review of treatments for the gastrointestinal manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus Primary headache in SLE –systematic review and meta-analysis Information and communication technology-based patient education for autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases: A scoping review Improvement in spinal pain at night and its impact on long-term outcomes in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: Results from Ixekizumab COAST-V randomised trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1