Gongbo Chen PhD , Prof Yuming Guo PhD , Prof Xu Yue PhD , Rongbin Xu PhD , Wenhua Yu MPH , Tingting Ye MSc , Prof Shilu Tong PhD , Prof Antonio Gasparrini PhD , Prof Michelle L Bell PhD , Prof Ben Armstrong PhD , Prof Joel Schwartz PhD , Prof Jouni J K Jaakkola PhD , Eric Lavigne PhD , Prof Paulo Hilario Nascimento Saldiva PhD , Prof Haidong Kan PhD , Dominic Royé PhD , Aleš Urban PhD , Prof Ana Maria Vicedo-Cabrera PhD , Aurelio Tobias PhD , Prof Bertil Forsberg PhD , Ariana Zeka
{"title":"All-cause, cardiovascular, and respiratory mortality and wildfire-related ozone: a multicountry two-stage time series analysis","authors":"Gongbo Chen PhD , Prof Yuming Guo PhD , Prof Xu Yue PhD , Rongbin Xu PhD , Wenhua Yu MPH , Tingting Ye MSc , Prof Shilu Tong PhD , Prof Antonio Gasparrini PhD , Prof Michelle L Bell PhD , Prof Ben Armstrong PhD , Prof Joel Schwartz PhD , Prof Jouni J K Jaakkola PhD , Eric Lavigne PhD , Prof Paulo Hilario Nascimento Saldiva PhD , Prof Haidong Kan PhD , Dominic Royé PhD , Aleš Urban PhD , Prof Ana Maria Vicedo-Cabrera PhD , Aurelio Tobias PhD , Prof Bertil Forsberg PhD , Ariana Zeka","doi":"10.1016/S2542-5196(24)00117-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Wildfire activity is an important source of tropospheric ozone (O<sub>3</sub>) pollution. However, no study to date has systematically examined the associations of wildfire-related O<sub>3</sub> exposure with mortality globally.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We did a multicountry two-stage time series analysis. From the Multi-City Multi-Country (MCC) Collaborative Research Network, data on daily all-cause, cardiovascular, and respiratory deaths were obtained from 749 locations in 43 countries or areas, representing overlapping periods from Jan 1, 2000, to Dec 31, 2016. We estimated the daily concentration of wildfire-related O<sub>3</sub> in study locations using a chemical transport model, and then calibrated and downscaled O<sub>3</sub> estimates to a resolution of 0·25° × 0·25° (approximately 28 km<sup>2</sup> at the equator). Using a random-effects meta-analysis, we examined the associations of short-term wildfire-related O<sub>3</sub> exposure (lag period of 0–2 days) with daily mortality, first at the location level and then pooled at the country, regional, and global levels. Annual excess mortality fraction in each location attributable to wildfire-related O<sub>3</sub> was calculated with pooled effect estimates and used to obtain excess mortality fractions at country, regional, and global levels.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Between 2000 and 2016, the highest maximum daily wildfire-related O<sub>3</sub> concentrations (≥30 μg/m<sup>3</sup>) were observed in locations in South America, central America, and southeastern Asia, and the country of South Africa. Across all locations, an increase of 1 μg/m<sup>3</sup> in the mean daily concentration of wildfire-related O<sub>3</sub> during lag 0–2 days was associated with increases of 0·55% (95% CI 0·29 to 0·80) in daily all-cause mortality, 0·44% (–0·10 to 0·99) in daily cardiovascular mortality, and 0·82% (0·18 to 1·47) in daily respiratory mortality. The associations of daily mortality rates with wildfire-related O<sub>3</sub> exposure showed substantial geographical heterogeneity at the country and regional levels. Across all locations, estimated annual excess mortality fractions of 0·58% (95% CI 0·31 to 0·85; 31 606 deaths [95% CI 17 038 to 46 027]) for all-cause mortality, 0·41% (–0·10 to 0·91; 5249 [–1244 to 11 620]) for cardiovascular mortality, and 0·86% (0·18 to 1·51; 4657 [999 to 8206]) for respiratory mortality were attributable to short-term exposure to wildfire-related O<sub>3</sub>.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>In this study, we observed an increase in all-cause and respiratory mortality associated with short-term wildfire-related O<sub>3</sub> exposure. Effective risk and smoke management strategies should be implemented to protect the public from the impacts of wildfires.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>Australian Research Council and the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48548,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Planetary Health","volume":"8 7","pages":"Pages e452-e462"},"PeriodicalIF":24.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542519624001177/pdfft?md5=f2c36ec34d941fad1a4883a23deecc67&pid=1-s2.0-S2542519624001177-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Planetary Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542519624001177","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Wildfire activity is an important source of tropospheric ozone (O3) pollution. However, no study to date has systematically examined the associations of wildfire-related O3 exposure with mortality globally.
Methods
We did a multicountry two-stage time series analysis. From the Multi-City Multi-Country (MCC) Collaborative Research Network, data on daily all-cause, cardiovascular, and respiratory deaths were obtained from 749 locations in 43 countries or areas, representing overlapping periods from Jan 1, 2000, to Dec 31, 2016. We estimated the daily concentration of wildfire-related O3 in study locations using a chemical transport model, and then calibrated and downscaled O3 estimates to a resolution of 0·25° × 0·25° (approximately 28 km2 at the equator). Using a random-effects meta-analysis, we examined the associations of short-term wildfire-related O3 exposure (lag period of 0–2 days) with daily mortality, first at the location level and then pooled at the country, regional, and global levels. Annual excess mortality fraction in each location attributable to wildfire-related O3 was calculated with pooled effect estimates and used to obtain excess mortality fractions at country, regional, and global levels.
Findings
Between 2000 and 2016, the highest maximum daily wildfire-related O3 concentrations (≥30 μg/m3) were observed in locations in South America, central America, and southeastern Asia, and the country of South Africa. Across all locations, an increase of 1 μg/m3 in the mean daily concentration of wildfire-related O3 during lag 0–2 days was associated with increases of 0·55% (95% CI 0·29 to 0·80) in daily all-cause mortality, 0·44% (–0·10 to 0·99) in daily cardiovascular mortality, and 0·82% (0·18 to 1·47) in daily respiratory mortality. The associations of daily mortality rates with wildfire-related O3 exposure showed substantial geographical heterogeneity at the country and regional levels. Across all locations, estimated annual excess mortality fractions of 0·58% (95% CI 0·31 to 0·85; 31 606 deaths [95% CI 17 038 to 46 027]) for all-cause mortality, 0·41% (–0·10 to 0·91; 5249 [–1244 to 11 620]) for cardiovascular mortality, and 0·86% (0·18 to 1·51; 4657 [999 to 8206]) for respiratory mortality were attributable to short-term exposure to wildfire-related O3.
Interpretation
In this study, we observed an increase in all-cause and respiratory mortality associated with short-term wildfire-related O3 exposure. Effective risk and smoke management strategies should be implemented to protect the public from the impacts of wildfires.
Funding
Australian Research Council and the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.
期刊介绍:
The Lancet Planetary Health is a gold Open Access journal dedicated to investigating and addressing the multifaceted determinants of healthy human civilizations and their impact on natural systems. Positioned as a key player in sustainable development, the journal covers a broad, interdisciplinary scope, encompassing areas such as poverty, nutrition, gender equity, water and sanitation, energy, economic growth, industrialization, inequality, urbanization, human consumption and production, climate change, ocean health, land use, peace, and justice.
With a commitment to publishing high-quality research, comment, and correspondence, it aims to be the leading journal for sustainable development in the face of unprecedented dangers and threats.