The Best of Both Worlds: Ultra-high-pitch Pulmonary Angiography with Free-Breathing Technique by Means of Photon-Counting Detector CT for Diagnosis of Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Abstract

Rationale and Objectives

To assess image quality and radiation dose of ultra-high-pitch CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) with free-breathing technique for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism using a photon-counting detector (PCD) CT compared to matched energy-integrating detector (EID)-based single-energy CTPA.

Materials and Methods

Fifty-one PCD-CTPAs were prospectively compared to 51 CTPAs on a third-generation dual-source EID-CT. CTPAs were acquired with an ultra-high-pitch protocol with free-breathing technique (40 mL contrast medium, pitch 3.2) at 140 kV (PCD) and 70–100 kV (EID). Iodine maps were reconstructed from spectral PCD-CTPAs. Image quality of CTPAs and iodine maps was assessed independently by three radiologists. Additionally, CT attenuation numbers within pulmonary arteries as well as signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios (SNR, CNR) were compared. Administered radiation dose was compared.

Results

CT attenuation was higher in the PCD-group (all P < 0.05). CNR and SNR were higher in lobar pulmonary arteries in PCD-CTPAs (P < 0.05), whereas no difference was ascertained within the pulmonary trunk (P > 0.05). Image quality of PCD-CTPA was rated best by all readers (excellent/good image quality in 96.1% of PCD-CTPAs vs. 50.9% of EID-CTPAs). PCD-CT produced no non-diagnostic scans vs. three non-diagnostic (5.9%) EID-CTPAs. Radiation dose was lower with PCD-CT than with EID-CT (effective dose 1.33 ± 0.47 vs. 1.80 ± 0.82 mSv; all P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Ultra-high-pitch CTPA with free-breathing technique with PCD-CT allows for superior image quality with significantly reduced radiation dose and full spectral information. With the ultra-high pitch, only PCD-CTPA enables reconstruction of iodine maps containing additional functional information.