Barriers to adopting circular procurement in the construction industry: The way forward

IF 3.3 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Sustainable Futures Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100244
Zeerak Waryam Sajid , Usman Aftab , Fahim Ullah
{"title":"Barriers to adopting circular procurement in the construction industry: The way forward","authors":"Zeerak Waryam Sajid ,&nbsp;Usman Aftab ,&nbsp;Fahim Ullah","doi":"10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Circular Economy (CE) is a necessary intervention for enabling resource efficiency, energy conservation, waste minimization, and sustainability within the construction industry (CI). Among its many facets, circular procurement (CP) is a nascent concept that enables CE in CI. Despite the extensive literature and review studies conducted on CE and its intricacies, critical studies documenting the barriers to the adoption of CP within the CI remain scarce. This study systematically reviews the existing literature on CP in CI retrieved from the Scopus database. A systematic literature review was conducted on 46 shortlisted articles published between 2010-2023 using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol, and the key barriers to the adoption of CP in CI were identified. The results reveal both hard barriers (HB), such as <em>lack of circular design and production, lack of reverse logistics, lack of standardization, lack of reliable information management</em>, and <em>lack of profitable business models,</em> and soft barriers (SB), such as <em>lack of stakeholder engagement, lack of trust on CP routes, resistance to change, perceived performance issues</em> and <em>lack of collaboration</em> as impediments to adoption of CP in CI. Further, the measures and strategies to mitigate the identified barriers were also identified from existing literature that are presented in the current study. Finally, a conceptual framework to facilitate the adoption of CP in CI is presented as a way forward to enable the transition from traditional to circular practices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34478,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Futures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666188824000947/pdfft?md5=d545ad516b3639b7612daa95526a5ba7&pid=1-s2.0-S2666188824000947-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Futures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666188824000947","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Circular Economy (CE) is a necessary intervention for enabling resource efficiency, energy conservation, waste minimization, and sustainability within the construction industry (CI). Among its many facets, circular procurement (CP) is a nascent concept that enables CE in CI. Despite the extensive literature and review studies conducted on CE and its intricacies, critical studies documenting the barriers to the adoption of CP within the CI remain scarce. This study systematically reviews the existing literature on CP in CI retrieved from the Scopus database. A systematic literature review was conducted on 46 shortlisted articles published between 2010-2023 using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol, and the key barriers to the adoption of CP in CI were identified. The results reveal both hard barriers (HB), such as lack of circular design and production, lack of reverse logistics, lack of standardization, lack of reliable information management, and lack of profitable business models, and soft barriers (SB), such as lack of stakeholder engagement, lack of trust on CP routes, resistance to change, perceived performance issues and lack of collaboration as impediments to adoption of CP in CI. Further, the measures and strategies to mitigate the identified barriers were also identified from existing literature that are presented in the current study. Finally, a conceptual framework to facilitate the adoption of CP in CI is presented as a way forward to enable the transition from traditional to circular practices.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建筑业采用循环采购的障碍:前进之路
循环经济(CE)是在建筑业(CI)中实现资源效率、能源节约、废物最小化和可持续发展的必要干预措施。在其诸多方面中,循环采购(CP)是在 CI 中实现 CE 的一个新兴概念。尽管有大量文献和综述研究介绍了循环采购及其复杂性,但记录了在建筑业采用循环采购的障碍的重要研究仍然很少。本研究系统地回顾了从 Scopus 数据库中检索到的有关在 CI 中采用 CP 的现有文献。采用系统综述和元分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)协议,对 2010-2023 年间发表的 46 篇入围文章进行了系统性文献综述,并确定了在 CI 中采用 CP 的主要障碍。结果显示,硬障碍(HB),如缺乏循环设计和生产、缺乏逆向物流、缺乏标准化、缺乏可靠的信息管理和缺乏盈利的商业模式,以及软障碍(SB),如缺乏利益相关者的参与、缺乏对氯化石蜡路线的信任、对变革的抵制、感知到的性能问题和缺乏合作,都是在化学工业中采用氯化石蜡的障碍。此外,本研究还从现有文献中找出了缓解所发现障碍的措施和战略。最后,还提出了一个促进在工商业中采用清洁生产的概念框架,作为实现从传统做法向循环做法过渡的前进方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Futures
Sustainable Futures Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
34
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable Futures: is a journal focused on the intersection of sustainability, environment and technology from various disciplines in social sciences, and their larger implications for corporation, government, education institutions, regions and society both at present and in the future. It provides an advanced platform for studies related to sustainability and sustainable development in society, economics, environment, and culture. The scope of the journal is broad and encourages interdisciplinary research, as well as welcoming theoretical and practical research from all methodological approaches.
期刊最新文献
Decommissioning of a fuel oil-fired thermoelectric power plant in Brazil - Economic feasibility under certain and risk conditions Environmental regulation, R&D subsidies, and industrial green total factor productivity Utilising machine learning for corporate social responsibility (CSR) and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) evaluation: Transitioning from committees to climate Spatial inequality in sub-national human development index: A case study of West Bengal districts Public participation in Governance of E-waste recycling: A tripartite evolutionary game analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1