Assessment of soil moisture on radon levels, radon exhalation, natural radioactivity, and radiological risks in offices and laboratories in GAEC

IF 1.7 4区 综合性期刊 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences Pub Date : 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1016/j.jrras.2024.101014
Eric Ofosu Asare , Francis Otoo , Oscar Kwaku Adukpo , Irene Opoku-Ntim
{"title":"Assessment of soil moisture on radon levels, radon exhalation, natural radioactivity, and radiological risks in offices and laboratories in GAEC","authors":"Eric Ofosu Asare ,&nbsp;Francis Otoo ,&nbsp;Oscar Kwaku Adukpo ,&nbsp;Irene Opoku-Ntim","doi":"10.1016/j.jrras.2024.101014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates the influence of moisture on soil radon exhalation, natural radioactivity in soil, and indoor radon concentrations in offices and laboratories at the Ghana Atomic Energy Commission (GAEC) and their associated radiological risks to workers. Radon exhalation rates were determined using the Sealed Can method. CR-39 SSNTD detectors were used to measure indoor radon concentrations. Gamma spectroscopy using HpGe detector was used to determine the activity concentrations of U-238, Ra-226, Th-232, and K-40 in the soil samples. The results showed mean concentrations of 14.3 ± 2.0 Bq/kg (CI 95%: 10.0–18.0) for U-238, 145.0 ± 10.0 Bq/kg (CI 95%:123.0–167.0) for K-40, 31.5 ± 6.0 Bq/kg (CI 95%: 24.0–39.0) for Th-232, and 15.6 ± 2.0 Bq/kg (CI 95%:14.0–29.0) for Ra-226. The results showed mean surface and mass exhalation rates of 6.9 ± 2.3 × 10<sup>−4</sup> Bq/m<sup>2</sup>/h<sup>1</sup> (CI 95%: 5.7 × 10<sup>−4</sup> –12.6 × 10<sup>−4</sup>) and 2.4 ± 0.4 (CI 95%: 1.9–4.2) nBq/kg<sup>1</sup>/h<sup>1</sup> respectively. The findings revealed mean indoor radon concentrations of 93.0 ± 10.0 Bq/m<sup>3</sup> (CI 95%: 88.0–98.0), 111.0 ± 12.0 Bq/m<sup>3</sup> (CI 95%: 102.0–119.0) and 145.0 ± 13.0 Bq/m<sup>3</sup> (CI 95%: 135.0–155.0) in the offices, laboratories, and basements respectively, with laboratories and basements exceeding the WHO reference level of 100 Bq/m<sup>3</sup>. A strong inverse relationship between moisture levels and exhalation rates (r = −0.8) was observed, leading to a negative correlation (r = −0.3). Between the moisture levels and indoor radon levels. The research findings indicated a mean annual effective dose of 0.6 mSv/yr. (CI 95%: 0.5–0.6) to the workers, which is well below occupational and public dose limits. The lung cancer cases of workers were computed which ranged from 0.9 × 10<sup>−8</sup> to 1.2 × 10<sup>−8</sup> cases per million people per year, which is less than the limit range of 170–230 per million people per year recommended by ICRP but remaining with safe radiological limits for workers. This study identified moderate radon exposure risks at the GAEC, exceeding the WHO recommendation. The correlation and trend analysis demonstrate strong relationships between moisture, exhalation rates, radium, and indoor radon.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1687850724001985/pdfft?md5=ad312f565873ecf3e186e1813e1545d9&pid=1-s2.0-S1687850724001985-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1687850724001985","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of moisture on soil radon exhalation, natural radioactivity in soil, and indoor radon concentrations in offices and laboratories at the Ghana Atomic Energy Commission (GAEC) and their associated radiological risks to workers. Radon exhalation rates were determined using the Sealed Can method. CR-39 SSNTD detectors were used to measure indoor radon concentrations. Gamma spectroscopy using HpGe detector was used to determine the activity concentrations of U-238, Ra-226, Th-232, and K-40 in the soil samples. The results showed mean concentrations of 14.3 ± 2.0 Bq/kg (CI 95%: 10.0–18.0) for U-238, 145.0 ± 10.0 Bq/kg (CI 95%:123.0–167.0) for K-40, 31.5 ± 6.0 Bq/kg (CI 95%: 24.0–39.0) for Th-232, and 15.6 ± 2.0 Bq/kg (CI 95%:14.0–29.0) for Ra-226. The results showed mean surface and mass exhalation rates of 6.9 ± 2.3 × 10−4 Bq/m2/h1 (CI 95%: 5.7 × 10−4 –12.6 × 10−4) and 2.4 ± 0.4 (CI 95%: 1.9–4.2) nBq/kg1/h1 respectively. The findings revealed mean indoor radon concentrations of 93.0 ± 10.0 Bq/m3 (CI 95%: 88.0–98.0), 111.0 ± 12.0 Bq/m3 (CI 95%: 102.0–119.0) and 145.0 ± 13.0 Bq/m3 (CI 95%: 135.0–155.0) in the offices, laboratories, and basements respectively, with laboratories and basements exceeding the WHO reference level of 100 Bq/m3. A strong inverse relationship between moisture levels and exhalation rates (r = −0.8) was observed, leading to a negative correlation (r = −0.3). Between the moisture levels and indoor radon levels. The research findings indicated a mean annual effective dose of 0.6 mSv/yr. (CI 95%: 0.5–0.6) to the workers, which is well below occupational and public dose limits. The lung cancer cases of workers were computed which ranged from 0.9 × 10−8 to 1.2 × 10−8 cases per million people per year, which is less than the limit range of 170–230 per million people per year recommended by ICRP but remaining with safe radiological limits for workers. This study identified moderate radon exposure risks at the GAEC, exceeding the WHO recommendation. The correlation and trend analysis demonstrate strong relationships between moisture, exhalation rates, radium, and indoor radon.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估土壤湿度对 GAEC 办公室和实验室的氡含量、氡呼出量、天然放射性和辐射风险的影响
本研究调查了湿度对加纳原子能委员会(GAEC)办公室和实验室的土壤氡呼出、土壤中天然放射性和室内氡浓度的影响,以及它们对工人造成的相关辐射风险。氡呼出率采用密封罐法测定。使用 CR-39 SSNTD 探测器测量室内氡浓度。使用 HpGe 探测器进行伽马光谱分析,以确定土壤样本中铀 238、镭 226、钍 232 和 K-40 的活度浓度。结果显示,铀 238 的平均浓度为 14.3 ± 2.0 Bq/kg(CI 95%:10.0-18.0),K-40 为 145.0 ± 10.0 Bq/kg(CI 95%:123.0-167.0),钍 232 为 31.5 ± 6.0 Bq/kg(CI 95%:24.0-39.0),镭 226 为 15.6 ± 2.0 Bq/kg(CI 95%:14.0-29.0)。结果显示,氡气的表面平均呼出率为 6.9 ± 2.3 × 10-4 Bq/m2/h1(CI 95%:5.7 × 10-4 -12.6 × 10-4),质量平均呼出率为 2.4 ± 0.4(CI 95%:1.9-4.2)nBq/kg1/h1。研究结果显示,办公室、实验室和地下室的平均室内氡浓度分别为 93.0 ± 10.0 Bq/m3 (CI 95%: 88.0-98.0)、111.0 ± 12.0 Bq/m3 (CI 95%: 102.0-119.0) 和 145.0 ± 13.0 Bq/m3 (CI 95%: 135.0-155.0),其中实验室和地下室超过了世界卫生组织的参考水平 100 Bq/m3。湿度水平与呼气率(r = -0.8)呈强烈的反比关系,导致负相关(r = -0.3)。湿度与室内氡含量之间的关系。研究结果表明,工人的年平均有效剂量为 0.6 mSv/年(CI 95%:0.5-0.6),远低于职业和公众剂量限值。计算得出的工人肺癌病例为每年每百万人 0.9 × 10-8 至 1.2 × 10-8,低于国际放射防护委员会建议的每年每百万人 170-230 例的限值范围,但仍符合工人的安全辐射限值。这项研究确定了 GAEC 的中度氡照射风险,超过了世界卫生组织的建议。相关性和趋势分析表明,湿度、呼气率、镭和室内氡之间的关系密切。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.90%
发文量
130
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences provides a high quality medium for the publication of substantial, original and scientific and technological papers on the development and applications of nuclear, radiation and isotopes in biology, medicine, drugs, biochemistry, microbiology, agriculture, entomology, food technology, chemistry, physics, solid states, engineering, environmental and applied sciences.
期刊最新文献
Optical and gamma-ray shielding properties of lead phosphate glasses by controlled copper oxide doping Statistical inference on the exponentiated moment exponential distribution and its discretization Cross-region feature fusion of global and local area for subtype classification prediction in cervical tumour Impact of nonlinear thermal radiation for magnetized dissipative flow of ternary hybrid nanomaterial (Al2 O3- SiO2- Fe3 O4- H2 O) Exploring the dynamic behavior of the two-phase model in radiative non-Newtonian nanofluid flow with Hall current and ion slip effects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1