Co-designing interventions to strengthen the primary health care system for the management of hypertension and type 2 diabetes in China

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific Pub Date : 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101131
Shangzhi Xiong , Wei Jiang , Yongchen Wang , Guosheng Wang , Xinyi Zhang , Chi Hu , Mingjia Bao , Fan Li , Jiajuan Yang , Huinan Hou , Nan Peng , Qiujun Wang , Rui Jiang , Tingzhuo Liu , Jin'ge Wang , Yanqiuzi Ma , Pengpeng Ye , Limin Mao , David Peiris , Maoyi Tian
{"title":"Co-designing interventions to strengthen the primary health care system for the management of hypertension and type 2 diabetes in China","authors":"Shangzhi Xiong ,&nbsp;Wei Jiang ,&nbsp;Yongchen Wang ,&nbsp;Guosheng Wang ,&nbsp;Xinyi Zhang ,&nbsp;Chi Hu ,&nbsp;Mingjia Bao ,&nbsp;Fan Li ,&nbsp;Jiajuan Yang ,&nbsp;Huinan Hou ,&nbsp;Nan Peng ,&nbsp;Qiujun Wang ,&nbsp;Rui Jiang ,&nbsp;Tingzhuo Liu ,&nbsp;Jin'ge Wang ,&nbsp;Yanqiuzi Ma ,&nbsp;Pengpeng Ye ,&nbsp;Limin Mao ,&nbsp;David Peiris ,&nbsp;Maoyi Tian","doi":"10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Policy makers and researchers are tasked with exploring ways to strengthen primary health care (PHC) to address the growing burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs). This study aims to use a co-design approach (i.e., meaningful involvement of research end users in study planning and design) to develop PHC interventions to improve the management of hypertension and type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in four study sites in China.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study adopted a three-step co-design approach, including (1) a two-round Delphi panel with health system and NCD professionals to identify prioritised health system challenges, (2) three co-design workshops (in each study site) with local health administrators, PHC providers, and residents with hypertension and/or T2DM, respectively, to develop interventions and identify factors influencing implementation, and (3) another round of co-design workshops with local health administrators to summarise findings and reach consensus. Qualitative synthesis was conducted to analyse results from the workshops.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Thirteen experts were involved in the two-round Delphi panel, which identified three prioritised health system challenges, including limited capacities of PHC providers, suboptimal service quality and evaluation mechanisms, and unreliable health information systems. The co-design workshops involved 116 local stakeholders in 16 sessions (four in each site), and developed three groups of interventions to address the challenges: (1) empowering PHC providers through on-the-job training for capacity building; (2) empowering patient communities through health education on healthy lifestyles and NCD self-management; and (3) empowering health administrators through local health data monitoring and strengthening governance for local PHC programs. Site-specific interventions were also considered to cater for different local contexts. Several recommendations were further identified for the implementation of these interventions, emphasising the importance of local customisation, community participation, and cross-sectoral collaborations.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>By engaging multiple stakeholders in priority setting and solution generation, this study summarised several key areas for change in health workforce, service delivery, and health information. Future research should examine the effectiveness and implementation of these interventions to improve NCD management in PHC in China.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>This study is funded by <span>National Health and Medical Research Council</span> (NHMRC) <span>Global Alliance for Chronic Diseases funding</span> (APP1169757) and <span>National Natural Science Foundation of China</span> (72074065). Shangzhi Xiong is supported by <span>University of New South Wales</span> tuition fee scholarship.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":22792,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666606524001251/pdfft?md5=57ee50ee97ae8debe20c46e1d8c49ae5&pid=1-s2.0-S2666606524001251-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666606524001251","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Policy makers and researchers are tasked with exploring ways to strengthen primary health care (PHC) to address the growing burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs). This study aims to use a co-design approach (i.e., meaningful involvement of research end users in study planning and design) to develop PHC interventions to improve the management of hypertension and type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in four study sites in China.

Methods

The study adopted a three-step co-design approach, including (1) a two-round Delphi panel with health system and NCD professionals to identify prioritised health system challenges, (2) three co-design workshops (in each study site) with local health administrators, PHC providers, and residents with hypertension and/or T2DM, respectively, to develop interventions and identify factors influencing implementation, and (3) another round of co-design workshops with local health administrators to summarise findings and reach consensus. Qualitative synthesis was conducted to analyse results from the workshops.

Findings

Thirteen experts were involved in the two-round Delphi panel, which identified three prioritised health system challenges, including limited capacities of PHC providers, suboptimal service quality and evaluation mechanisms, and unreliable health information systems. The co-design workshops involved 116 local stakeholders in 16 sessions (four in each site), and developed three groups of interventions to address the challenges: (1) empowering PHC providers through on-the-job training for capacity building; (2) empowering patient communities through health education on healthy lifestyles and NCD self-management; and (3) empowering health administrators through local health data monitoring and strengthening governance for local PHC programs. Site-specific interventions were also considered to cater for different local contexts. Several recommendations were further identified for the implementation of these interventions, emphasising the importance of local customisation, community participation, and cross-sectoral collaborations.

Interpretation

By engaging multiple stakeholders in priority setting and solution generation, this study summarised several key areas for change in health workforce, service delivery, and health information. Future research should examine the effectiveness and implementation of these interventions to improve NCD management in PHC in China.

Funding

This study is funded by National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Global Alliance for Chronic Diseases funding (APP1169757) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (72074065). Shangzhi Xiong is supported by University of New South Wales tuition fee scholarship.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共同设计干预措施,加强中国高血压和 2 型糖尿病管理的初级卫生保健系统
背景政策制定者和研究人员的任务是探索加强初级卫生保健(PHC)的方法,以应对日益沉重的非传染性疾病(NCDs)负担。本研究旨在采用共同设计方法(即本研究旨在采用共同设计方法(即研究最终用户有意义地参与研究规划和设计),在中国的四个研究地点开发初级卫生保健干预措施,以改善高血压和 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)的管理。方法该研究采用了三步共同设计法,包括:(1)与卫生系统和非传染性疾病专业人员进行两轮德尔菲小组讨论,以确定卫生系统面临的优先挑战;(2)(在每个研究地点)与当地卫生管理人员、初级保健服务提供者以及高血压和/或 T2DM 患者分别进行三次共同设计研讨会,以制定干预措施并确定影响实施的因素;(3)与当地卫生管理人员进行另一轮共同设计研讨会,以总结研究结果并达成共识。研究结果13位专家参与了两轮德尔菲小组讨论,确定了三个优先考虑的卫生系统挑战,包括初级保健服务提供者能力有限、服务质量和评估机制欠佳以及卫生信息系统不可靠。116 名当地利益相关者参加了 16 次共同设计研讨会(每个地点四次),并制定了三组干预措施来应对这些挑战:(1)通过能力建设在职培训,增强初级保健服务提供者的能力;(2)通过健康生活方式和非传染性疾病自我管理方面的健康教育,增强患者社区的能力;以及(3)通过当地健康数据监测和加强当地初级保健计划的管理,增强健康管理者的能力。此外,还考虑了针对具体地点的干预措施,以适应当地的不同情况。通过让多方利益相关者参与优先事项的设定和解决方案的制定,本研究总结出了卫生人力、服务提供和卫生信息方面需要改变的几个关键领域。未来的研究应考察这些干预措施的有效性和实施情况,以改善中国初级卫生保健中的非传染性疾病管理。 基金资助本研究由美国国家卫生与医学研究委员会(NHMRC)全球慢性病联盟(APP1169757)和中国国家自然科学基金(72074065)资助。熊尚志获得新南威尔士大学学费奖学金资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific
The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
305
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Regional Health – Western Pacific, a gold open access journal, is an integral part of The Lancet's global initiative advocating for healthcare quality and access worldwide. It aims to advance clinical practice and health policy in the Western Pacific region, contributing to enhanced health outcomes. The journal publishes high-quality original research shedding light on clinical practice and health policy in the region. It also includes reviews, commentaries, and opinion pieces covering diverse regional health topics, such as infectious diseases, non-communicable diseases, child and adolescent health, maternal and reproductive health, aging health, mental health, the health workforce and systems, and health policy.
期刊最新文献
A contemporary analysis of the Australian clinical and genetic landscape of spinal muscular atrophy: a registry based study A complex intervention to reduce antibiotic prescribing in rural China: a cluster randomised controlled trial Impact of time to antibiotics on clinical outcome in paediatric febrile neutropenia: a target trial emulation of 1685 episodes Why I decide to leave South Korea healthcare system Towards an agenda of action and research for making health systems responsive to the needs of people with disabilities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1