Judicial Mafia and ecological in-justice: Obstacles to policy enforcement in Indonesian forest management and protection

IF 2.7 Q1 FORESTRY Trees, Forests and People Pub Date : 2024-06-27 DOI:10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100613
Atikah Mardhiya Rohmy, Hartiwiningsih, I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani
{"title":"Judicial Mafia and ecological in-justice: Obstacles to policy enforcement in Indonesian forest management and protection","authors":"Atikah Mardhiya Rohmy,&nbsp;Hartiwiningsih,&nbsp;I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani","doi":"10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Indonesia is among the eight nations with the greatest forests area in the world. One of the most powerful tools fighting global climate change is forest conservation. Appropriate, prudent, and practical regulations and policies are needed for the protection and preservation of forests. Therefore, Ecological justice-based environmental management is a concern for all nations in the world. To achieve this, regulations and policies must take into account the needs of both people and other forest ecosystem components. This article covers a range of Indonesian laws and policies of crimes related to forest destruction. It identifies three key challenges in achieving ecological justice. The first is the government's intervention and judicial mafia's involvement. The second is ineffective criminal penalties. Punishment for environmental destruction should employ an ecological perspective and a criminal system that promotes corrective justice, restorative justice, and rehabilitative justice. The final challenge is the dominance of political power and government intervention. Political interests influence the bureaucracy's changing tasks and responsibilities and cause the conflict of power.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36104,"journal":{"name":"Trees, Forests and People","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719324001201/pdfft?md5=2a8ca9881651f15146e8162fdd633af6&pid=1-s2.0-S2666719324001201-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trees, Forests and People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719324001201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Indonesia is among the eight nations with the greatest forests area in the world. One of the most powerful tools fighting global climate change is forest conservation. Appropriate, prudent, and practical regulations and policies are needed for the protection and preservation of forests. Therefore, Ecological justice-based environmental management is a concern for all nations in the world. To achieve this, regulations and policies must take into account the needs of both people and other forest ecosystem components. This article covers a range of Indonesian laws and policies of crimes related to forest destruction. It identifies three key challenges in achieving ecological justice. The first is the government's intervention and judicial mafia's involvement. The second is ineffective criminal penalties. Punishment for environmental destruction should employ an ecological perspective and a criminal system that promotes corrective justice, restorative justice, and rehabilitative justice. The final challenge is the dominance of political power and government intervention. Political interests influence the bureaucracy's changing tasks and responsibilities and cause the conflict of power.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
司法黑手党和生态不公正:印度尼西亚森林管理和保护政策执行的障碍
印度尼西亚是世界上森林面积最大的八个国家之一。森林保护是应对全球气候变化的最有力工具之一。保护和保存森林需要适当、谨慎和切实可行的法规和政策。因此,以生态正义为基础的环境管理是世界各国共同关注的问题。为了实现这一目标,法规和政策必须考虑到人类和其他森林生态系统组成部分的需求。本文介绍了印尼与森林破坏相关的一系列法律和政策。文章指出了实现生态公正的三大挑战。首先是政府干预和司法黑手党的参与。其次是刑事处罚不力。对破坏环境行为的惩罚应采用生态学视角和刑事制度,以促进纠正性正义、恢复性正义和康复性正义。最后一个挑战是政治权力和政府干预的主导地位。政治利益影响着官僚机构不断变化的任务和责任,并导致权力冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Trees, Forests and People
Trees, Forests and People Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
172
审稿时长
56 days
期刊最新文献
Tapping below the lateral line does not reduce maple sap yield or quality Examining woody plant diversity across indigenous agroforestry practices in the Kellem Wollega zone, Western Ethiopia The livelihood impacts of eucalypt plantations on rural farm households in Western Gurage Watersheds, Central-south Ethiopia Palynological approaches to forest restoration in Southeast Asia: Challenges and opportunities for Thailand—A systematic review Timber traceability, determining effective methods to combat illegal logging in Africa: A review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1