Wild red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) do not participate in SARS-CoV-2 circulation in Poland

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES One Health Pub Date : 2024-06-22 DOI:10.1016/j.onehlt.2024.100845
Aleksander Goll , Martyna Krupińska , Joanna Nowicka , Karolina Baranowicz , Lukasz Rabalski , Anna Lass , Aleksandra Gorska , Tarja Sironen , Ravi Kant , Maciej Grzybek
{"title":"Wild red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) do not participate in SARS-CoV-2 circulation in Poland","authors":"Aleksander Goll ,&nbsp;Martyna Krupińska ,&nbsp;Joanna Nowicka ,&nbsp;Karolina Baranowicz ,&nbsp;Lukasz Rabalski ,&nbsp;Anna Lass ,&nbsp;Aleksandra Gorska ,&nbsp;Tarja Sironen ,&nbsp;Ravi Kant ,&nbsp;Maciej Grzybek","doi":"10.1016/j.onehlt.2024.100845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Background: Biomonitoring is an essential activity for identifying possible vectors and reservoirs of pathogens and predicting potential outbreaks. Wild red foxes are present in both sylvatic and synanthropic environments, making them potential carriers of zoonotic pathogens. Experimental studies have shown that both coyotes and red foxes can transmit SARS-CoV-2. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in wild red foxes hunted in northern Poland. Methods: Oral swabs, blood clots or heat tissue samples were collected from 292 red foxes hunted in northern Poland. We used both molecular (RT-PCR) and serological (IFA) approaches to detect SARS-CoV-2 infections in the sampled animals. Results: We did not find any evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the collected samples, using both molecular and serological methods. Conclusions: Despite foxes having frequent contact with humans, human waste, and other animals, they do not appear to participate in the circulation of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in our geographical region. Nevertheless, we believe that continuous biomonitoring should be performed to assess the SARS-CoV-2 epidemiological situation in the wild.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19577,"journal":{"name":"One Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235277142400171X/pdfft?md5=bad3d69dcecfd638bf7806c7237ce51e&pid=1-s2.0-S235277142400171X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"One Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235277142400171X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Biomonitoring is an essential activity for identifying possible vectors and reservoirs of pathogens and predicting potential outbreaks. Wild red foxes are present in both sylvatic and synanthropic environments, making them potential carriers of zoonotic pathogens. Experimental studies have shown that both coyotes and red foxes can transmit SARS-CoV-2. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in wild red foxes hunted in northern Poland. Methods: Oral swabs, blood clots or heat tissue samples were collected from 292 red foxes hunted in northern Poland. We used both molecular (RT-PCR) and serological (IFA) approaches to detect SARS-CoV-2 infections in the sampled animals. Results: We did not find any evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the collected samples, using both molecular and serological methods. Conclusions: Despite foxes having frequent contact with humans, human waste, and other animals, they do not appear to participate in the circulation of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in our geographical region. Nevertheless, we believe that continuous biomonitoring should be performed to assess the SARS-CoV-2 epidemiological situation in the wild.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
野生赤狐(Vulpes vulpes)不参与波兰的 SARS-CoV-2 循环
背景:生物监测是确定可能的病原体载体和贮藏库以及预测潜在疫情的重要活动。野生赤狐既存在于食草动物环境中,也存在于同类环境中,因此它们是人畜共患病原体的潜在携带者。实验研究表明,郊狼和赤狐都能传播 SARS-CoV-2。本研究旨在评估波兰北部狩猎的野生赤狐中 SARS-CoV-2 的流行率和血清流行率。研究方法从波兰北部狩猎的 292 只赤狐身上采集口腔拭子、血块或热组织样本。我们采用分子(RT-PCR)和血清学(IFA)方法检测采样动物中的 SARS-CoV-2 感染情况。结果:通过分子和血清学方法,我们在采集的样本中未发现任何 SARS-CoV-2 感染的证据。结论尽管狐狸经常与人类、人类排泄物和其他动物接触,但它们似乎并没有参与 SARS-CoV-2 病毒在我们地区的传播。尽管如此,我们认为仍应进行持续的生物监测,以评估 SARS-CoV-2 在野外的流行情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
One Health
One Health Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: One Health - a Gold Open Access journal. The mission of One Health is to provide a platform for rapid communication of high quality scientific knowledge on inter- and intra-species pathogen transmission, bringing together leading experts in virology, bacteriology, parasitology, mycology, vectors and vector-borne diseases, tropical health, veterinary sciences, pathology, immunology, food safety, mathematical modelling, epidemiology, public health research and emergency preparedness. As a Gold Open Access journal, a fee is payable on acceptance of the paper. Please see the Guide for Authors for more information. Submissions to the following categories are welcome: Virology, Bacteriology, Parasitology, Mycology, Vectors and vector-borne diseases, Co-infections and co-morbidities, Disease spatial surveillance, Modelling, Tropical Health, Discovery, Ecosystem Health, Public Health.
期刊最新文献
Tick-borne viruses: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and animal models A 15-day pilot biodiversity intervention with horses in a farm system leads to gut microbiome rewilding in 10 urban Italian children Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from treated municipal wastewaters and Black-headed Gull nestlings on the recipient river How policy advocacy promotes regulated antibiotic use: Evidence from meat duck farmers of China The antimicrobial resistance landscape of slaughterhouses in western Kenya: A microbiological case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1