Ending the stigma of male domestic violence and abuse victims: A mixed-methods study

IF 3.3 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Criminal Justice Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2024.102222
Paige Ambrozewicz, Courtney Hammond, Dean Fido
{"title":"Ending the stigma of male domestic violence and abuse victims: A mixed-methods study","authors":"Paige Ambrozewicz,&nbsp;Courtney Hammond,&nbsp;Dean Fido","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2024.102222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Male domestic violence and abuse (DVA) victims experience great levels of stigma, and as such, research that explores public perceptions of this group is needed to reduce barriers to reporting and attract gender-sensitive support. Across two studies, this paper investigates public perceptions of male victims of DVA through a mixed methods approach. In study one, 202 participants provided judgements of vignettes depicting a scenario of DVA, which differed as a function of victim sex and whether a ‘justification’ (i.e., infidelity) for DVA was present. After controlling for participant age, sex, and own victimisation, vignettes featuring male victims and victim infidelity were viewed more harshly. In study two, comparative deductive thematic analysis was used to explore qualitative perceptions of male DVA victims between men who did and did not identify as being a victim of DVA. Results indicated a lack of knowledge and awareness surrounding male DVA victims' experiences and support available, in addition to doubt in the support services’ and Criminal Justice System’s (CJS) ability to effectively respond to male victims. This paper highlights the need for gender-sensitive support, in addition to improvements across educational pathways, support services, and the CJS to end the stigmas attached to male DVA victims.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48272,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminal Justice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235224000710","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Male domestic violence and abuse (DVA) victims experience great levels of stigma, and as such, research that explores public perceptions of this group is needed to reduce barriers to reporting and attract gender-sensitive support. Across two studies, this paper investigates public perceptions of male victims of DVA through a mixed methods approach. In study one, 202 participants provided judgements of vignettes depicting a scenario of DVA, which differed as a function of victim sex and whether a ‘justification’ (i.e., infidelity) for DVA was present. After controlling for participant age, sex, and own victimisation, vignettes featuring male victims and victim infidelity were viewed more harshly. In study two, comparative deductive thematic analysis was used to explore qualitative perceptions of male DVA victims between men who did and did not identify as being a victim of DVA. Results indicated a lack of knowledge and awareness surrounding male DVA victims' experiences and support available, in addition to doubt in the support services’ and Criminal Justice System’s (CJS) ability to effectively respond to male victims. This paper highlights the need for gender-sensitive support, in addition to improvements across educational pathways, support services, and the CJS to end the stigmas attached to male DVA victims.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消除家庭暴力和虐待行为男性受害者的耻辱感:混合方法研究
家庭暴力和虐待行为(DVA)的男性受害者在很大程度上会受到鄙视,因此,需要开展研究来探讨公众对这一群体的看法,以减少报告障碍并吸引对性别问题有敏感认识的支持。本文通过两项研究,采用混合方法调查了公众对 DVA 男性受害者的看法。在第一项研究中,202 名参与者对描述家庭暴力情景的小故事进行了评判,评判结果因受害者性别和是否存在家庭暴力的 "正当理由"(即不忠)而有所不同。在控制了受试者的年龄、性别和自身受害情况后,男性受害者和受害者不忠的小故事受到了更严厉的评价。在第二项研究中,研究人员采用了比较演绎式主题分析法来探讨男性受害者对家庭暴力的定性看法。结果表明,除了对支持服务和刑事司法系统(CJS)有效应对男性受害者的能力表示怀疑外,人们对男性家庭暴力受害者的经历和可提供的支持缺乏了解和认识。本文强调,除了改善教育途径、支持服务和刑事司法系统外,还需要提供对性别问题有敏感认识的支持,以消除对家庭暴力男性受害者的偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Criminal Justice
Journal of Criminal Justice CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Criminal Justice is an international journal intended to fill the present need for the dissemination of new information, ideas and methods, to both practitioners and academicians in the criminal justice area. The Journal is concerned with all aspects of the criminal justice system in terms of their relationships to each other. Although materials are presented relating to crime and the individual elements of the criminal justice system, the emphasis of the Journal is to tie together the functioning of these elements and to illustrate the effects of their interactions. Articles that reflect the application of new disciplines or analytical methodologies to the problems of criminal justice are of special interest. Since the purpose of the Journal is to provide a forum for the dissemination of new ideas, new information, and the application of new methods to the problems and functions of the criminal justice system, the Journal emphasizes innovation and creative thought of the highest quality.
期刊最新文献
A new college campus and crime: Focusing on crime opportunity and gentrification in downtown Orlando, Florida 1200 paths and counting: A script analysis of firearms trafficking in the Province of Quebec, Canada To tent and protect: Homeless encampments as “protective facilities” Classifying perpetrators of stalking-related behavior with latent class analysis When failure is the option: Unravelling sexual assault outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1