The shaping of marketplace moral sentiments

IF 10.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Business Research Pub Date : 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114810
Aya Aboelenien , Zeynep Arsel
{"title":"The shaping of marketplace moral sentiments","authors":"Aya Aboelenien ,&nbsp;Zeynep Arsel","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Existing research shows how morality and markets intersect. However, there are two oversights: 1) how morality is attributed to some markets and not others, and 2) how moral attributions on some markets change spatiotemporally. We conduct a <em>meta</em>-synthesis of 101 papers to develop a framework for how moral attributions on markets are shaped. First, we define the concept of <em>marketplace moral sentiment</em>. Next, we unpack the work of marketplace actors that destabilize, re-stabilize, and change marketplace moral sentiments. Through this, four distinct types of moral sentiments can form: harmonized, divided, dispersed, and enforced. We contribute to the literature on morality and markets by showing how markets are enacted and reconfigured through moral contestations. We also offer theoretical extensions related to organizational heterogeneity, a market’s susceptibility to moral contestation, and the role of non-human actors in shaping marketplace moral sentiments. Finally, we discuss the managerial and policy implications of our work.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014829632400314X/pdfft?md5=ed82d4801c09bbae55ebadb424236178&pid=1-s2.0-S014829632400314X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014829632400314X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Existing research shows how morality and markets intersect. However, there are two oversights: 1) how morality is attributed to some markets and not others, and 2) how moral attributions on some markets change spatiotemporally. We conduct a meta-synthesis of 101 papers to develop a framework for how moral attributions on markets are shaped. First, we define the concept of marketplace moral sentiment. Next, we unpack the work of marketplace actors that destabilize, re-stabilize, and change marketplace moral sentiments. Through this, four distinct types of moral sentiments can form: harmonized, divided, dispersed, and enforced. We contribute to the literature on morality and markets by showing how markets are enacted and reconfigured through moral contestations. We also offer theoretical extensions related to organizational heterogeneity, a market’s susceptibility to moral contestation, and the role of non-human actors in shaping marketplace moral sentiments. Finally, we discuss the managerial and policy implications of our work.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
市场道德情感的形成
现有研究表明,道德与市场是如何交织在一起的。然而,其中存在两个疏忽:1)道德是如何归因于某些市场而非其他市场的;2)对某些市场的道德归因是如何随时空变化的。我们对 101 篇论文进行了元综合,为市场的道德归因如何形成建立了一个框架。首先,我们定义了市场道德情感的概念。其次,我们解读了市场行为者破坏、重新稳定和改变市场道德情感的工作。由此,可以形成四种不同类型的道德情感:和谐的、分裂的、分散的和强制的。我们通过展示市场是如何通过道德争论而形成和重构的,为有关道德和市场的文献做出了贡献。我们还提供了与组织异质性、市场对道德争论的易感性以及非人类参与者在塑造市场道德情感中的作用相关的理论延伸。最后,我们讨论了我们的工作对管理和政策的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
期刊最新文献
Energy Performance of Building Refurbishments: Predictive and Prescriptive AI-based Machine Learning Approaches Digital transformation along the supply chain: Spillover effects from vertical partnerships Bridging consumption and work: The effects of thoughts about different types of purchases on job-related motivations A meta-analytic investigation into the pay-it-forward phenomenon: The roles of individualism-collectivism and social distance The more, the better: The influence of overconfident CEOs on their firms’ digital orientation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1