Assessing the nexus of Generative AI adoption, ethical considerations and organizational performance

IF 11.1 1区 管理学 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Technovation Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103064
Nripendra P. Rana , Rajasshrie Pillai , Brijesh Sivathanu , Nishtha Malik
{"title":"Assessing the nexus of Generative AI adoption, ethical considerations and organizational performance","authors":"Nripendra P. Rana ,&nbsp;Rajasshrie Pillai ,&nbsp;Brijesh Sivathanu ,&nbsp;Nishtha Malik","doi":"10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Numerous enterprises employ Generative AI (GenAI) for a plethora of business operations, which can enhance organizational effectiveness. The adoption might be driven by multiple factors influencing the business landscape. Additionally, numerous ethical considerations could impact the deployment of GenAI. This unique study investigated how organizations adopt GenAI and its effects on their performance. Further, this research utilized institutional theory and ethical guidelines for AI design to develop a research framework examining how organizations adopt GenAI and its impact on their performance. A survey of 384 managers from information technology (IT) and information technology-enabled services (ITeS) companies was conducted. Data analysis was done using PLS-SEM to examine and validate the proposed model. The study outcome reveals that institutional pressures, i.e., coercive, normative and mimetic forces, influence the use of GenAI in organizations. It was also found that fairness, accountability, transparency, accuracy and autonomy influence the use of GenAI. Also, the results divulge that the use of GenAI influences organizational performance and is moderated by organizational innovativeness. This study provides insights to developers of GenAI, senior management of companies, the government and IT policymakers by highlighting the institutional pressures and ethical principles influencing the use of GenAI.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49444,"journal":{"name":"Technovation","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 103064"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497224001147/pdfft?md5=fb767bbb6c7b5aca8cea142c3c37b257&pid=1-s2.0-S0166497224001147-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technovation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497224001147","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Numerous enterprises employ Generative AI (GenAI) for a plethora of business operations, which can enhance organizational effectiveness. The adoption might be driven by multiple factors influencing the business landscape. Additionally, numerous ethical considerations could impact the deployment of GenAI. This unique study investigated how organizations adopt GenAI and its effects on their performance. Further, this research utilized institutional theory and ethical guidelines for AI design to develop a research framework examining how organizations adopt GenAI and its impact on their performance. A survey of 384 managers from information technology (IT) and information technology-enabled services (ITeS) companies was conducted. Data analysis was done using PLS-SEM to examine and validate the proposed model. The study outcome reveals that institutional pressures, i.e., coercive, normative and mimetic forces, influence the use of GenAI in organizations. It was also found that fairness, accountability, transparency, accuracy and autonomy influence the use of GenAI. Also, the results divulge that the use of GenAI influences organizational performance and is moderated by organizational innovativeness. This study provides insights to developers of GenAI, senior management of companies, the government and IT policymakers by highlighting the institutional pressures and ethical principles influencing the use of GenAI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估生成式人工智能的采用、伦理考虑和组织绩效之间的关系
许多企业在大量业务运营中采用了生成式人工智能(GenAI),这可以提高组织效率。影响商业格局的多种因素可能会推动这种应用。此外,许多道德因素也会影响 GenAI 的部署。这项独特的研究调查了组织如何采用 GenAI 及其对组织绩效的影响。此外,本研究还利用机构理论和人工智能设计的道德准则,制定了一个研究框架,以考察组织如何采用 GenAI 及其对组织绩效的影响。本研究对信息技术(IT)和信息技术服务(ITeS)公司的 384 名管理人员进行了调查。使用 PLS-SEM 进行了数据分析,以检验和验证所提出的模型。研究结果表明,制度压力(即强制力、规范力和模仿力)会影响组织对 GenAI 的使用。研究还发现,公平性、问责制、透明度、准确性和自主性会影响 GenAI 的使用。此外,研究结果还表明,GenAI 的使用会影响组织绩效,并受到组织创新性的调节。本研究通过强调影响 GenAI 使用的制度压力和道德原则,为 GenAI 开发人员、公司高级管理层、政府和 IT 政策制定者提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Technovation
Technovation 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
11.20%
发文量
208
审稿时长
91 days
期刊介绍: The interdisciplinary journal Technovation covers various aspects of technological innovation, exploring processes, products, and social impacts. It examines innovation in both process and product realms, including social innovations like regulatory frameworks and non-economic benefits. Topics range from emerging trends and capital for development to managing technology-intensive ventures and innovation in organizations of different sizes. It also discusses organizational structures, investment strategies for science and technology enterprises, and the roles of technological innovators. Additionally, it addresses technology transfer between developing countries and innovation across enterprise, political, and economic systems.
期刊最新文献
Capturing the breadth of value creation with science fiction storytelling: Evidence from smart service design workshops A classification framework for generative artificial intelligence for social good Digital technology and innovation:The impact of blockchain application on enterprise innovation Exploring and investigating the complementarity and multidimensionality of innovation for sustainability research: Past present and future Facilitator or figurehead? The impact of academician shareholder on corporate innovation: Evidence from China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1