Improving livelihood through crop-livestock integration: Insights from a farm trajectory model

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Agricultural Systems Pub Date : 2024-07-05 DOI:10.1016/j.agsy.2024.103949
Maximilien Cosme , Arouna Koné , Franck Pommereau , Cédric Gaucherel
{"title":"Improving livelihood through crop-livestock integration: Insights from a farm trajectory model","authors":"Maximilien Cosme ,&nbsp;Arouna Koné ,&nbsp;Franck Pommereau ,&nbsp;Cédric Gaucherel","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2024.103949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><p>Smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa seek to improve their livelihoods by investing in new assets. These investments and their effectiveness are constrained by current capital and management practices. Therefore, to understand farm trajectories, the combined effects of different management practices and the timing of investments and losses must be considered.</p></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><p>The present study aimed to determine, under 128 distinct scenarios, which ones enable a poorly endowed farm to develop and maintain a sustainable agropastoralism in southwestern Burkina Faso.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>For this purpose, we used the Ecological Discrete-Event Network (EDEN) modelling framework. This framework includes a formalism based on if-then rules describing economic and ecological events (e.g. investments and losses) that affect qualitative variables. The model rules were built from a literature review, expert interviews, and direct observations. Based on this model, the software then computes all trajectories the farm can take. Based on empirically-reported farm types and trajectories, we then attempted to falsify the modelled dynamics using model-checking techniques.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>Model predictions matched all observed farm types and trajectories, thus not falsifying the model. Results highlighted that, for this system, livelihood improvement relied on the ability of the farm to to increase its cultivated area, workforce, livestock and fodder resources, all while producing and applying organic inputs to maintain or recover soil fertility. Although qualitative, model predictions are consistent with available observations and provide explanations about farm trajectories in southwestern Burkina Faso.</p></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><p>The EDEN modelling framework, through its qualitative — yet rigorous — exploration of all possible trajectories, can help the decision-making process by highlighting the far-reaching consequences of management actions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24000994","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CONTEXT

Smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa seek to improve their livelihoods by investing in new assets. These investments and their effectiveness are constrained by current capital and management practices. Therefore, to understand farm trajectories, the combined effects of different management practices and the timing of investments and losses must be considered.

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to determine, under 128 distinct scenarios, which ones enable a poorly endowed farm to develop and maintain a sustainable agropastoralism in southwestern Burkina Faso.

METHODS

For this purpose, we used the Ecological Discrete-Event Network (EDEN) modelling framework. This framework includes a formalism based on if-then rules describing economic and ecological events (e.g. investments and losses) that affect qualitative variables. The model rules were built from a literature review, expert interviews, and direct observations. Based on this model, the software then computes all trajectories the farm can take. Based on empirically-reported farm types and trajectories, we then attempted to falsify the modelled dynamics using model-checking techniques.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Model predictions matched all observed farm types and trajectories, thus not falsifying the model. Results highlighted that, for this system, livelihood improvement relied on the ability of the farm to to increase its cultivated area, workforce, livestock and fodder resources, all while producing and applying organic inputs to maintain or recover soil fertility. Although qualitative, model predictions are consistent with available observations and provide explanations about farm trajectories in southwestern Burkina Faso.

SIGNIFICANCE

The EDEN modelling framework, through its qualitative — yet rigorous — exploration of all possible trajectories, can help the decision-making process by highlighting the far-reaching consequences of management actions.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过作物-牲畜一体化改善生计:农场轨迹模型的启示
背景撒哈拉以南非洲的小农寻求通过投资新资产来改善生计。这些投资及其效果受到当前资本和管理实践的制约。因此,要了解农场的发展轨迹,就必须考虑不同管理方法的综合影响以及投资和损失的时间安排。本研究旨在确定在 128 种不同的情景下,哪些情景能使布基纳法索西南部一个条件较差的农场发展并维持可持续的农牧业。方法为此,我们使用了生态离散事件网络 (EDEN) 建模框架。该框架包括一种基于 "如果-那么 "规则的形式主义,用于描述影响定性变量的经济和生态事件(如投资和损失)。模型规则是根据文献综述、专家访谈和直接观察建立的。根据该模型,软件可计算出农场可能出现的所有轨迹。结果和结论模型预测与所有观察到的农场类型和轨迹相吻合,因此模型没有被证伪。结果表明,对该系统而言,生计的改善依赖于农场增加耕地面积、劳动力、牲畜和饲料资源的能力,同时生产和应用有机投入品以保持或恢复土壤肥力。尽管是定性的,但模型预测与现有观测结果一致,并为布基纳法索西南部的农场轨迹提供了解释。意义EDEN建模框架通过对所有可能的轨迹进行定性但严格的探索,强调了管理行动的深远影响,有助于决策过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural Systems
Agricultural Systems 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
7.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments. The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas: Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making; The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment; Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems; Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.
期刊最新文献
Regional-scale trade-offs among beef production, emissions and land use impacts: A cattle diet composition perspective Perceived resilience of community supported agriculture in Germany Integrating production, ecology and livelihood confers an efficiency-driven farming system based on the sustainable farmland framework Eco-efficiency in the agricultural landscape of North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany Developing a sustainable assessment framework for identifying industrial water suitability: Perspective on the water-energy-food nexus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1