Understanding adoption intention of virtual medical consultation systems: Perceptions of ChatGPT and satisfaction with doctors

IF 9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Computers in Human Behavior Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2024.108359
Di Zhang, Xiaoman Zhao
{"title":"Understanding adoption intention of virtual medical consultation systems: Perceptions of ChatGPT and satisfaction with doctors","authors":"Di Zhang,&nbsp;Xiaoman Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2024.108359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examined the impact of perceptions of ChatGPT, the leading AI chatbot since November 2022, on the acceptance and perceived efficacy of future GPT-powered virtual medical consultation systems (GPT-VMCSs), as well as their influence on the propensity to adopt such systems amid debates over their suitability for medical consultations. By utilizing the technology acceptance model (TAM), this study differentiated between perceptions of ChatGPT and GPT-VMCS by assessing how these perceptions, along with doctor satisfaction, resistance, and ChatGPT usage, affect adoption intentions. Among the 2150 participants from 21 countries, 1038 who had used ChatGPT or observed its use were selected for hypothesis testing. The results indicated that the perceived usefulness (PU) of the GPT-VMCS was the strongest predictor of adoption intentions, with the perceived ease of use (PEOU) also playing a critical role. In contrast, resistance, which was positively influenced by doctor satisfaction, was negatively associated with adoption intentions. The quality of ChatGPT responses was positively correlated with GPT-VMCS PU, although direct usage of ChatGPT did not significantly affect adoption intentions. The study concludes with a discussion of both theoretical and practical implications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563224002279","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined the impact of perceptions of ChatGPT, the leading AI chatbot since November 2022, on the acceptance and perceived efficacy of future GPT-powered virtual medical consultation systems (GPT-VMCSs), as well as their influence on the propensity to adopt such systems amid debates over their suitability for medical consultations. By utilizing the technology acceptance model (TAM), this study differentiated between perceptions of ChatGPT and GPT-VMCS by assessing how these perceptions, along with doctor satisfaction, resistance, and ChatGPT usage, affect adoption intentions. Among the 2150 participants from 21 countries, 1038 who had used ChatGPT or observed its use were selected for hypothesis testing. The results indicated that the perceived usefulness (PU) of the GPT-VMCS was the strongest predictor of adoption intentions, with the perceived ease of use (PEOU) also playing a critical role. In contrast, resistance, which was positively influenced by doctor satisfaction, was negatively associated with adoption intentions. The quality of ChatGPT responses was positively correlated with GPT-VMCS PU, although direct usage of ChatGPT did not significantly affect adoption intentions. The study concludes with a discussion of both theoretical and practical implications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解虚拟医疗咨询系统的采用意向:对 ChatGPT 的看法和对医生的满意度
本研究探讨了自 2022 年 11 月以来一直处于领先地位的人工智能聊天机器人 ChatGPT 对未来由 GPT 驱动的虚拟医疗咨询系统(GPT-VMCS)的接受度和感知功效的影响,以及它们对采用此类系统的倾向的影响,因为人们对这些系统是否适用于医疗咨询还存在争议。通过利用技术接受模型(TAM),本研究对 ChatGPT 和 GPT-VMCS 的认知进行了区分,评估了这些认知以及医生满意度、抵触情绪和 ChatGPT 使用情况对采用意愿的影响。在来自 21 个国家的 2150 名参与者中,有 1038 人使用过 ChatGPT 或观察过其使用情况,他们被选中进行假设检验。结果表明,GPT-VMCS 的感知有用性(PU)是预测采用意愿的最强指标,感知易用性(PEOU)也起着关键作用。与此相反,受医生满意度积极影响的抵触情绪与采用意愿呈负相关。ChatGPT 响应的质量与 GPT-VMCS PU 呈正相关,尽管直接使用 ChatGPT 对采用意愿没有显著影响。本研究最后讨论了理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
381
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.
期刊最新文献
Theory of consumption value: A lens to examine the use and continual use intention of online game subscription services Smartphone's on, humanness's off: Phubbing breeds dehumanization via subjectivity uncertainty Editorial Board Personalized context-aware systems for sustainable agriculture development using ubiquitous devices and adaptive learning The affective and relational correlates of algorithmic beliefs among U.S. online daters: Extension of two previous studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1