New finds of European bison identified through the systematic DNA-based species identification of archaeological remains of large bovines from Scandinavia

IF 1.5 2区 历史学 N/A ARCHAEOLOGY Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports Pub Date : 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1016/j.jasrep.2024.104668
Erika Rosengren , Conor Rossi , Matti T. Heino , Mikkel-Holger S. Sinding
{"title":"New finds of European bison identified through the systematic DNA-based species identification of archaeological remains of large bovines from Scandinavia","authors":"Erika Rosengren ,&nbsp;Conor Rossi ,&nbsp;Matti T. Heino ,&nbsp;Mikkel-Holger S. Sinding","doi":"10.1016/j.jasrep.2024.104668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>It is clear from the subfossil record that aurochs (<em>Bos primigenius</em>) and European bison (<em>Bison bonasus</em>) coexisted in southern Scandinavia during the late Pleistocene and early Holocene. However, the two species are unevenly represented, especially in zooarchaeological assemblages where the aurochs is the only identified bovine. By applying genetic taxonomic assignment from mitochondrial and shallow whole-genome shotgun data from prehistoric bovine remains, this study explores the proposition that the predominance of aurochs in the subfossil record in part results from misassignment of European bison remains caused by overlapping skeletal morphology. Although our results confirm that most aurochs assignments of bovine bones are valid, through our analysis we were able to expand the European bison subfossil record and also reveal the exploitation of the species by prehistoric Scandinavians during the very early Holocene. Hence, it would appear that Mesolithic communities’ hunting strategies centred primarily around the fauna local to their wetland settlements and/or indeed point to the early local disappearance of the European bison, as previously supposed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48150,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X24002967/pdfft?md5=322fff2e07bbc8109dd62aeb54fb3e91&pid=1-s2.0-S2352409X24002967-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X24002967","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is clear from the subfossil record that aurochs (Bos primigenius) and European bison (Bison bonasus) coexisted in southern Scandinavia during the late Pleistocene and early Holocene. However, the two species are unevenly represented, especially in zooarchaeological assemblages where the aurochs is the only identified bovine. By applying genetic taxonomic assignment from mitochondrial and shallow whole-genome shotgun data from prehistoric bovine remains, this study explores the proposition that the predominance of aurochs in the subfossil record in part results from misassignment of European bison remains caused by overlapping skeletal morphology. Although our results confirm that most aurochs assignments of bovine bones are valid, through our analysis we were able to expand the European bison subfossil record and also reveal the exploitation of the species by prehistoric Scandinavians during the very early Holocene. Hence, it would appear that Mesolithic communities’ hunting strategies centred primarily around the fauna local to their wetland settlements and/or indeed point to the early local disappearance of the European bison, as previously supposed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过对斯堪的纳维亚大型野牛考古遗存进行基于 DNA 的系统物种鉴定,确认欧洲野牛的新发现
从化石记录中可以清楚地看出,在更新世晚期和全新世早期,驼鹿(Bos primigenius)和欧洲野牛(Bison bonasus)曾在斯堪的纳维亚半岛南部共存。然而,这两个物种的代表性并不均衡,尤其是在动物考古学的组合中,欧洲野牛是唯一被确认的牛类。本研究通过对史前牛遗骸的线粒体和浅层全基因组霰弹枪数据进行遗传分类,探讨了这样一个命题,即在亚化石记录中黑驼占主导地位的部分原因是欧洲野牛遗骸因骨骼形态重叠而造成的错误分类。尽管我们的研究结果证实了大多数牛骨的瘤牛分类是正确的,但通过我们的分析,我们能够扩大欧洲野牛亚化石的记录,并揭示史前斯堪的纳维亚人在全新世早期对该物种的利用。由此看来,中石器时代族群的狩猎策略主要是围绕其湿地定居点附近的动物群展开的,并且/或者确实如以前所推测的那样,欧洲野牛在当地很早就消失了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
405
期刊介绍: Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports is aimed at archaeologists and scientists engaged with the application of scientific techniques and methodologies to all areas of archaeology. The journal focuses on the results of the application of scientific methods to archaeological problems and debates. It will provide a forum for reviews and scientific debate of issues in scientific archaeology and their impact in the wider subject. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports will publish papers of excellent archaeological science, with regional or wider interest. This will include case studies, reviews and short papers where an established scientific technique sheds light on archaeological questions and debates.
期刊最新文献
The precise and accurate dating of medieval bridge remains at Ancrum, Scottish Borders, using stable isotope dendrochronology Challenging the Atacama desert: Agronomic and water conditions for pre-Hispanic maize agriculture in hyper arid environments inferred by δ18O isotopes Scientific analysis on decorative sheet metals of the Spring and Autumn period unearthed from Zaoshulin cemetery, Hubei, China In the search for the origin of the barley at Norse farms in Greenland The impact of the volcanic double event in AD 536 and AD 539/540 on tree-ring growth and felling activity in Danish oak trees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1